Citadel
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,989  Michael Lantz SR 35:06
2,019  James Cunningham SR 35:09
2,306  Jeremy Shipley FR 35:49
2,529  Adam Hohlbein FR 36:29
2,732  Charles Braddock SR 37:31
2,816  John Snowman FR 38:14
2,826  Eric Avalos SO 38:20
2,866  Ian Hohlbein SO 38:54
National Rank #274 of 315
Southeast Region Rank #41 of 48
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 42nd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Michael Lantz James Cunningham Jeremy Shipley Adam Hohlbein Charles Braddock John Snowman Eric Avalos Ian Hohlbein
Winthrop/Adidas Invitational 09/16 1417 35:49 35:58 35:24 37:10 37:39 40:28
Will Wilson Citadel Invitational 09/30 1434 35:10 35:43 36:26 37:21 38:28 38:49 38:11
ECU Pirates Invitational 10/13 1368 35:29 35:01 35:27 36:23 37:15 38:53 38:38
Southern Conference Championship 10/28 1370 35:03 35:09 35:51 36:15 37:46 37:20 37:25
Southeast Region Championships 11/10 35:15 37:20





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 41.5 1170



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Michael Lantz 191.1
James Cunningham 193.9
Jeremy Shipley 229.4
Adam Hohlbein 261.4
Charles Braddock 284.8
John Snowman 291.8
Eric Avalos 292.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 0.2% 0.2 35
36 0.2% 0.2 36
37 0.7% 0.7 37
38 1.7% 1.7 38
39 3.9% 3.9 39
40 7.8% 7.8 40
41 20.0% 20.0 41
42 54.3% 54.3 42
43 11.4% 11.4 43
44 0.1% 0.1 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0