Marshall
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
677  Daniel Green JR 33:09
1,335  Nickolas Schmidt JR 34:06
1,347  Alex Minor SO 34:07
1,892  Hunter Deem SO 34:55
2,250  Austin Jordan FR 35:40
2,497  Josh Endress FR 36:23
2,532  Nick Salmons SO 36:30
2,693  Austin Hamrick SR 37:19
2,714  Joel Krznaric FR 37:25
2,822  Coy Smith FR 38:19
National Rank #209 of 315
Mid-Atlantic Region Rank #20 of 32
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 20th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 83.2%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Daniel Green Nickolas Schmidt Alex Minor Hunter Deem Austin Jordan Josh Endress Nick Salmons Austin Hamrick Joel Krznaric Coy Smith
Commodore Classic 09/16 1209 32:47 34:07 33:22 35:34 36:30 37:30 37:28 37:05 37:02
Joe Piane Invitational (Gold) 09/29 1220 32:53 34:22 33:47 35:45 35:49 38:10
High Point Vertcross 10/13 1223 33:13 34:22 34:16 35:01 35:23 35:50 36:26 37:33 37:17 38:18
Conference USA Championship 10/28 1223 33:36 33:43 34:27 34:52 35:18 36:17 36:18
Mid-Atlantic Region Championships 11/10 1223 33:21 33:49 34:50 34:12 35:41 36:23 36:54





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 19.8 596 0.4 2.0 6.8 22.8 51.4 11.7 3.5 1.3 0.4



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Daniel Green 53.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.3
Nickolas Schmidt 109.0
Alex Minor 111.6
Hunter Deem 146.7
Austin Jordan 167.5
Josh Endress 177.9
Nick Salmons 179.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 0.4% 0.4 16
17 2.0% 2.0 17
18 6.8% 6.8 18
19 22.8% 22.8 19
20 51.4% 51.4 20
21 11.7% 11.7 21
22 3.5% 3.5 22
23 1.3% 1.3 23
24 0.4% 0.4 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0