Creighton
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
363  Lauren Ogg FR 20:42
714  Maddie Ivy JR 21:14
777  Emily Martin FR 21:18
1,250  Megan Paule FR 21:53
1,309  Emily Mauser SR 21:56
1,559  Alexis Altmaier FR 22:14
1,564  Vanessa Miller JR 22:14
1,573  Grace Mimmack SO 22:14
1,638  Maile Shigemasa SO 22:19
1,825  Emily Peterson SR 22:30
2,621  Adriana Kammerer FR 23:39
2,934  Katy Kambhu SR 24:31
National Rank #138 of 339
Midwest Region Rank #17 of 36
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 19th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 2.5%
Top 20 in Regional 76.4%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Lauren Ogg Maddie Ivy Emily Martin Megan Paule Emily Mauser Alexis Altmaier Vanessa Miller Grace Mimmack Maile Shigemasa Emily Peterson Adriana Kammerer
Chile Pepper Festival 10/02 1160 20:42 21:19 22:22 22:04 21:44 22:31 22:15 22:30
Bradley 'Pink' Classic Invitational (Red) 10/16 1182 20:54 21:14 21:49 21:55 22:04 22:23 22:29 22:25 22:50 23:40
Big East Conference Championships 10/31 1123 20:33 21:20 21:17 21:41 21:57 22:47 22:24 22:03 22:15 22:19
Midwest Region Championships 11/13 1110 20:45 21:05 20:58 21:47 21:40 21:47 22:18





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 17.7 482 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.5 2.6 3.5 5.5 6.8 7.4 8.7 9.2 10.3 10.3 9.7 8.4 6.2 4.9 2.3 1.2 0.6 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Lauren Ogg 39.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.9 1.3 1.4 1.8 2.1
Maddie Ivy 79.7 0.0 0.0
Emily Martin 86.3 0.0 0.0
Megan Paule 136.1
Emily Mauser 140.8
Alexis Altmaier 168.1
Vanessa Miller 168.2




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 0.0% 0.0 6
7 0.1% 0.1 7
8 0.2% 0.2 8
9 0.6% 0.6 9
10 1.5% 1.5 10
11 2.6% 2.6 11
12 3.5% 3.5 12
13 5.5% 5.5 13
14 6.8% 6.8 14
15 7.4% 7.4 15
16 8.7% 8.7 16
17 9.2% 9.2 17
18 10.3% 10.3 18
19 10.3% 10.3 19
20 9.7% 9.7 20
21 8.4% 8.4 21
22 6.2% 6.2 22
23 4.9% 4.9 23
24 2.3% 2.3 24
25 1.2% 1.2 25
26 0.6% 0.6 26
27 0.1% 0.1 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0