Grambling
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
2,538  Halima Chepkwony FR 23:29
3,098  Tichina Lewis SO 25:11
3,226  Faith Early SR 26:06
3,250  Creshonda Carter JR 26:18
3,268  Brooklynn Allison SO 26:26
3,315  Yolonda Decker-Williams SO 26:59
3,351  Kourtney Burney FR 27:42
3,379  Jasmine Pierce SR 28:22
3,409  Joy Ngula FR 29:55
National Rank #314 of 339
South Central Region Rank #27 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 29th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Halima Chepkwony Tichina Lewis Faith Early Creshonda Carter Brooklynn Allison Yolonda Decker-Williams Kourtney Burney Jasmine Pierce Joy Ngula
McNeese Cowboy Stampede 10/03 1680 22:45 25:54 25:31 26:12 27:12 28:42 29:25
Watson Ford Invitational 10/09 1857 25:30 26:50 26:01 26:18 27:40 28:25
Mississippi College Choctaw Open 10/17 1857 23:43 24:37 27:13 28:47 28:30 28:17 29:29
SWAC Championships 10/24 1740 24:11 24:59 26:13 26:22 26:42 26:56 27:35 28:21 32:06





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 28.2 908 0.1 9.4 14.5 24.1 51.9 0.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Halima Chepkwony 149.9
Tichina Lewis 183.0
Faith Early 192.9
Creshonda Carter 194.8
Brooklynn Allison 196.2
Yolonda Decker-Williams 200.0
Kourtney Burney 204.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 0.1% 0.1 25
26 9.4% 9.4 26
27 14.5% 14.5 27
28 24.1% 24.1 28
29 51.9% 51.9 29
30 0.0% 0.0 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0