Niagara
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
2,229  Kayla Murphy JR 23:00
2,327  Caroline Hampton JR 23:09
2,781  Sam Sauer JR 24:01
2,935  Tyler Levengood SR 24:32
2,976  Danielle Dorogi FR 24:42
3,042  Sarah Grubbs SO 24:55
3,172  Aly Orfano JR 25:43
3,243  Megan Helf JR 26:15
3,297  victoria Couturier FR 26:46
National Rank #295 of 339
Northeast Region Rank #40 of 43
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 42nd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Kayla Murphy Caroline Hampton Sam Sauer Tyler Levengood Danielle Dorogi Sarah Grubbs Aly Orfano Megan Helf victoria Couturier
Paul Short Invitational (Brown) 10/02 1424 22:57 23:03 24:08 24:25 25:43 24:57
Canisius Alumni Classic 10/17 1470 23:05 23:05 23:52 24:36 24:47 24:55 25:18 26:16 26:46
MAAC Championships 10/31 1476 23:13 23:22 24:07 24:37 24:17 25:28 26:19 26:17 26:52
Northeast Region Championships 11/13 1476 22:49 23:18 24:32 24:26 24:33





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 41.4 1279



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Kayla Murphy 222.3
Caroline Hampton 229.4
Sam Sauer 268.0
Tyler Levengood 278.5
Danielle Dorogi 281.3
Sarah Grubbs 284.5
Aly Orfano 290.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 0.0% 0.0 36
37 0.0% 0.0 37
38 0.3% 0.3 38
39 2.5% 2.5 39
40 10.0% 10.0 40
41 35.8% 35.8 41
42 50.1% 50.1 42
43 1.3% 1.3 43
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0