Rice
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
104  Cali Roper JR 20:01
361  Elsa Racasan SO 20:42
498  Katie Jensen JR 20:54
1,039  Hannah Kay JR 21:37
1,051  Abigail Cartwright FR 21:38
1,314  Fabiola Andujar-Perez SO 21:56
1,366  Ellen Diemert SO 22:01
1,530  Kristin Sweeney JR 22:12
2,233  Anna Figuerora FR 23:00
National Rank #76 of 339
South Central Region Rank #5 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 5.9%
Most Likely Finish 6th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 50.8%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Cali Roper Elsa Racasan Katie Jensen Hannah Kay Abigail Cartwright Fabiola Andujar-Perez Ellen Diemert Kristin Sweeney Anna Figuerora
Texas A&M Invitational 09/26 1088 20:17 21:05 21:48 23:00 22:06 21:59 22:00 23:18
Rim Rock Classic 10/03 994 20:12 20:37 21:11 21:33 23:20 22:03 22:13 22:09
HBU Invite 10/09 1404 23:04
D1 Pre-Nationals (Red) 10/17 914 19:57 20:39 20:44 21:32 22:03 21:50 22:19
Conference USA Championships 10/31 919 20:11 20:52 20:26 21:21 21:25 21:53 21:57 22:24 22:45
South Central Region Championships 11/13 956 19:59 20:46 21:06 22:10 21:12 21:37 22:13
NCAA Championship 11/21 19:49





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 5.9% 30.4 760 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.8 1.4 3.6
Region Championship 100% 5.3 171 5.9 10.7 15.4 18.8 22.7 22.7 3.6 0.3



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Cali Roper 81.3% 90.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2
Elsa Racasan 7.5% 171.7
Katie Jensen 6.1% 200.0
Hannah Kay 5.9% 246.3
Abigail Cartwright 5.9% 246.1
Fabiola Andujar-Perez 5.9% 250.2
Ellen Diemert 6.0% 250.9


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Cali Roper 5.6 0.2 5.0 9.0 13.1 14.7 13.9 11.2 8.8 6.7 5.2 3.7 2.8 1.8 1.2 0.9 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1
Elsa Racasan 20.5 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.9 1.4 1.8 2.2 3.1 4.0 3.9 4.8 4.8 5.0 5.3 5.0 4.6 4.9 4.8 4.5 4.4 3.9
Katie Jensen 27.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.7 1.3 1.4 2.0 2.2 2.1 2.9 2.8 3.1 3.9 3.9 4.5 4.2
Hannah Kay 57.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
Abigail Cartwright 57.9 0.0 0.0
Fabiola Andujar-Perez 71.8
Ellen Diemert 75.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 5.9% 100.0% 5.9 5.9 2
3 10.7% 0.2% 0.0 10.7 0.0 3
4 15.4% 15.4 4
5 18.8% 18.8 5
6 22.7% 22.7 6
7 22.7% 22.7 7
8 3.6% 3.6 8
9 0.3% 0.3 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
Total 100% 5.9% 5.9 0.0 94.1 5.9 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Texas 43.8% 1.0 0.4
Stephen F. Austin 9.1% 1.0 0.1
Mid. Tenn. State 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.5
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 2.0