Lafayette
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,740  Emily Moore FR 22:24
1,941  Stephanie Benko SR 22:39
2,254  Caroline Harmon FR 23:03
2,373  Mikayla Pacilio SO 23:13
2,460  Kelly Reager JR 23:21
2,596  Alexa Kwapinski SO 23:35
2,734  Brigid McGill JR 23:54
2,784  Stephanie McCartney JR 24:01
2,809  Jennifer Salvatore SO 24:05
2,811  Isabella Maita JR 24:05
2,822  Morgan Nobles SO 24:08
2,986  Zoe Nagasing SR 24:44
3,059  Brook Blackshaw FR 24:59
3,144  Nicolette Reilly SR 25:30
3,334  Colleen McGovern SO 27:18
National Rank #266 of 339
Mid-Atlantic Region Rank #26 of 37
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 27th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Emily Moore Stephanie Benko Caroline Harmon Mikayla Pacilio Kelly Reager Alexa Kwapinski Brigid McGill Stephanie McCartney Jennifer Salvatore Isabella Maita Morgan Nobles
Paul Short Invitational (Gold) 10/02 1500 23:13 23:44 24:15 24:15
Leopard Invitational 10/17 1541 24:03 23:56 24:30
Princeton Invitational 10/17 1394 22:32 23:12 23:07 24:48 23:16
Patriot League Championships 10/31 1330 22:36 22:53 23:04 23:02 23:28 23:51 24:18 24:03 24:59 23:11
Mid-Atlantic Region Championships 11/13 1356 22:05 22:25 23:36 23:36 25:11 23:27 24:13





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 26.3 794 0.0 0.1 0.8 2.6 9.2 37.6 48.9 0.9 0.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Emily Moore 133.0
Stephanie Benko 146.4
Caroline Harmon 166.6
Mikayla Pacilio 173.1
Kelly Reager 178.2
Alexa Kwapinski 185.2
Brigid McGill 192.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 0.0% 0.0 21
22 0.1% 0.1 22
23 0.8% 0.8 23
24 2.6% 2.6 24
25 9.2% 9.2 25
26 37.6% 37.6 26
27 48.9% 48.9 27
28 0.9% 0.9 28
29 0.0% 0.0 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0