Southern Utah
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
701  Angie Nickerson SO 21:12
900  Ashley Hawks SR 21:27
1,125  Josie Brandow JR 21:44
1,386  Brighton Glassman FR 22:02
1,433  Kaylee Boyer SR 22:05
1,508  Ashley Tyndall SO 22:10
1,898  Sarah Sargent FR 22:35
2,017  Paige Cardiff JR 22:44
National Rank #183 of 339
Mountain Region Rank #18 of 20
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 18th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Angie Nickerson Ashley Hawks Josie Brandow Brighton Glassman Kaylee Boyer Ashley Tyndall Sarah Sargent Paige Cardiff
Roy Griak Invitational 09/26 1225 21:34 21:34 21:28 22:11 23:22 22:33
UNLV Invitational 10/03 1242 21:23 22:18 22:26 22:58 21:44 22:32 24:14
D1 Pre-Nationals (Black) 10/17 1102 21:03 20:26 21:36 21:55 21:52 22:47
Big Sky Championships 10/31 1217 21:02 21:55 22:12 21:57 21:55 22:29
Mountain Region Championships 11/13 1219 21:13 21:21 21:53 22:27 23:10 22:23





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 17.2 467 0.2 0.7 2.0 3.7 5.5 9.8 20.0 50.0 7.9 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Angie Nickerson 70.9
Ashley Hawks 82.4
Josie Brandow 96.5
Brighton Glassman 109.3
Kaylee Boyer 111.0
Ashley Tyndall 114.0
Sarah Sargent 126.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 0.2% 0.2 11
12 0.7% 0.7 12
13 2.0% 2.0 13
14 3.7% 3.7 14
15 5.5% 5.5 15
16 9.8% 9.8 16
17 20.0% 20.0 17
18 50.0% 50.0 18
19 7.9% 7.9 19
20 0.1% 0.1 20
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0