Auburn
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
48  Veronica Eder SR 19:47
352  Brenda Kigen SO 20:40
680  Anna Nelson JR 21:11
699  Emily Stevens SR 21:12
774  Susan Rachel Givens SR 21:17
817  Kenzley Defler SO 21:19
1,791  Claire Kennedy SR 22:20
National Rank #74 of 344
South Region Rank #7 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.5%
Most Likely Finish 7th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 20.4%
Top 10 in Regional 96.9%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Veronica Eder Brenda Kigen Anna Nelson Emily Stevens Susan Rachel Givens Kenzley Defler Claire Kennedy
Furman Classic 09/10 965 19:46 21:02 21:08 21:49 21:10 22:54
Commadore Classic 09/17 996 19:51 21:04 21:37 21:30 21:22 22:19
Louisville Classic (Gold) 10/01 921 19:51 20:37 21:34 21:06 21:26 21:16 21:57
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/14 935 19:41 21:10 21:02 21:05 21:10 21:26 22:06
SEC Championship 10/28 901 19:43 20:45 21:15 21:12 20:57 21:22 22:31
South Region Championships 11/11 19:43





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.5% 29.2 690 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1
Region Championship 100% 7.0 239 0.3 1.7 6.0 12.5 19.6 23.7 17.9 11.4 3.9 2.1 0.7 0.5



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Veronica Eder 80.5% 51.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.7 0.8 0.7 1.1 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.8
Brenda Kigen 0.6% 166.0
Anna Nelson 0.5% 220.0
Emily Stevens 0.5% 227.0
Susan Rachel Givens 0.5% 233.5
Kenzley Defler 0.5% 228.0
Claire Kennedy 0.5% 250.7


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Veronica Eder 3.0 16.0 18.4 15.7 12.5 9.3 6.1 4.6 4.0 2.3 2.2 2.6 1.7 1.2 0.8 1.0 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1
Brenda Kigen 32.8 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.9 1.3 1.5 1.2 1.5 2.1 1.9 2.2 2.6 2.0 3.1 2.6
Anna Nelson 66.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Emily Stevens 68.3 0.1 0.1 0.1
Susan Rachel Givens 73.5
Kenzley Defler 77.0 0.1
Claire Kennedy 149.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 0.3% 100.0% 0.3 0.3 2
3 1.7% 6.1% 0.1 0.1 1.6 0.1 3
4 6.0% 0.8% 0.1 5.9 0.1 4
5 12.5% 0.4% 0.1 12.5 0.1 5
6 19.6% 19.6 6
7 23.7% 23.7 7
8 17.9% 17.9 8
9 11.4% 11.4 9
10 3.9% 3.9 10
11 2.1% 2.1 11
12 0.7% 0.7 12
13 0.5% 0.5 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.5% 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 99.5 0.3 0.2




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Louisville 9.3% 1.0 0.1
Elon 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Clemson 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Georgia 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.1
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 1.0