Toledo
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
477  Joan Jepkirui JR 20:54
582  Maja Pacaric SR 21:04
601  Athena Welsh FR 21:05
650  Jennifer Lichter SO 21:09
705  Caroline Lambert SO 21:12
739  Stephanie Barlow JR 21:15
919  Stephanie Sherman FR 21:27
924  Theresa Warsecke SR 21:27
936  Nina Bendixen SO 21:28
1,049  Delainey Phelps JR 21:35
1,118  Janelle Noe JR 21:39
1,174  Petronela Simiuc SO 21:43
1,395  Olivia Chinn SO 21:56
1,657  Natalie Camardo SR 22:12
1,801  Mia Jerman FR 22:20
2,068  Julia Mendiola JR 22:38
2,338  Maddie Ferner FR 22:56
2,614  Marissa Rossetti SR 23:21
National Rank #116 of 344
Great Lakes Region Rank #15 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 10th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 42.9%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Joan Jepkirui Maja Pacaric Athena Welsh Jennifer Lichter Caroline Lambert Stephanie Barlow Stephanie Sherman Theresa Warsecke Nina Bendixen Delainey Phelps Janelle Noe
Mel Brodt Invitational 09/16 1125 21:05 21:11 21:11 21:10 21:06 21:15 21:18 21:14 21:16 21:27 21:47
Louisville Classic (Gold) 10/01 1028 20:50 20:59 20:41 21:02 21:31 21:08 21:20 21:18 21:26 21:36
Bradley "Pink" Classic 10/14 1210 21:46 21:14 21:29 21:55 21:37
Bradley "Pink" Classic (White) 10/14
ISU adidas Pre Nationals (Blue) 10/15 1036 20:50 20:43 21:05 21:12 20:55 21:29
Mid-American Conference 10/29 1090 20:54 20:58 21:05 21:15 21:19 21:05 21:52 21:43
Great Lakes Region Championships 11/11 1111 20:52 21:26 20:56 21:10 21:20 21:47





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 11.4 351 0.1 0.6 2.0 4.8 35.5 20.0 14.1 9.1 5.5 4.4 2.1 1.2 0.7 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Joan Jepkirui 0.0% 161.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Joan Jepkirui 59.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2
Maja Pacaric 70.1 0.1
Athena Welsh 71.6 0.1
Jennifer Lichter 76.2
Caroline Lambert 80.3
Stephanie Barlow 82.8 0.1
Stephanie Sherman 95.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 0.1% 0.1 6
7 0.6% 0.6 7
8 2.0% 2.0 8
9 4.8% 4.8 9
10 35.5% 35.5 10
11 20.0% 20.0 11
12 14.1% 14.1 12
13 9.1% 9.1 13
14 5.5% 5.5 14
15 4.4% 4.4 15
16 2.1% 2.1 16
17 1.2% 1.2 17
18 0.7% 0.7 18
19 0.1% 0.1 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Louisville 9.3% 1.0 0.1
Auburn 0.3% 1.0 0.0
Elon 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.1
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 2.0