Elon
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
449  Brigid Brennan SR 20:46
641  Coralea Geraniotis JR 21:03
870  Melissa Anastasakis SO 21:19
908  Corey Weiss SR 21:22
1,353  Chelsea Smith JR 21:51
2,370  Sami King SO 23:03
2,532  Rachael Wesolowski FR 23:19
2,622  Bridget Kanaley FR 23:28
2,642  Emily Smith SO 23:31
2,794  Lauren Lynch FR 23:53
2,905  Abigail Reimer ? 24:15
National Rank #138 of 348
Southeast Region Rank #18 of 50
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 16th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.4%
Top 20 in Regional 95.3%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Brigid Brennan Coralea Geraniotis Melissa Anastasakis Corey Weiss Chelsea Smith Sami King Rachael Wesolowski Bridget Kanaley Emily Smith Lauren Lynch Abigail Reimer
Paul Short Gold 09/29 1141 20:38 21:17 21:41 21:03 23:07
High Point Vertcross 10/13 22:55 23:59 23:38 24:22
Pre-Nationals (Black) 10/14 1146 20:42 21:07 21:41 21:50 22:00 23:47 23:18
CAA Championship 10/28 1102 20:50 20:55 21:03 21:16 22:00 23:11 22:58 24:24 23:18 24:10 24:10
Southeast Region Championships 11/10 1109 20:45 21:09 21:10 21:14 21:27





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 16.5 493 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 1.6 3.2 10.1 15.4 23.3 16.8 12.0 7.7 4.4 2.4 1.4 0.7 0.2 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Brigid Brennan 57.7 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3
Coralea Geraniotis 79.1 0.1
Melissa Anastasakis 99.1
Corey Weiss 104.1
Chelsea Smith 148.3
Sami King 226.4
Rachael Wesolowski 241.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 0.1% 0.1 8
9 0.1% 0.1 9
10 0.3% 0.3 10
11 0.6% 0.6 11
12 1.6% 1.6 12
13 3.2% 3.2 13
14 10.1% 10.1 14
15 15.4% 15.4 15
16 23.3% 23.3 16
17 16.8% 16.8 17
18 12.0% 12.0 18
19 7.7% 7.7 19
20 4.4% 4.4 20
21 2.4% 2.4 21
22 1.4% 1.4 22
23 0.7% 0.7 23
24 0.2% 0.2 24
25 0.1% 0.1 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
50 50
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0