Rice
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
371  Khayla Patel SO 20:39
597  Elsa Racasan SR 20:59
857  Lourdes Vivas di Lorenzi FR 21:18
1,682  Anna Figueroa JR 22:11
1,761  Maddie Forbes FR 22:17
1,804  Sara Ivackoic FR 22:20
1,820  Ruby Watson FR 22:21
1,842  Rachel Peterson JR 22:22
2,551  Sarah Glover FR 23:21
National Rank #135 of 348
South Central Region Rank #10 of 38
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 9th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.1%
Top 10 in Regional 71.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Khayla Patel Elsa Racasan Lourdes Vivas di Lorenzi Anna Figueroa Maddie Forbes Sara Ivackoic Ruby Watson Rachel Peterson Sarah Glover
Texas A&M Invitational 09/23 1108 20:38 20:53 21:23 22:09 23:05 22:00 22:01 23:45
McNeese State Cowboy Stampede 09/30 1142 20:49 21:05 21:11 22:15 22:05 22:20 21:57 22:03 23:18
Pre-Nationals (Black) 10/14 1100 20:22 21:44 21:06 21:58 22:04 22:52 22:28
Conference USA Championship 10/28 1148 20:55 20:58 21:20 22:02 22:24 21:44 22:17 22:25 23:05
South Region Championships 11/10 1111 20:32 20:53 21:31 22:47 22:37 22:46 22:15





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 9.6 304 0.1 0.9 16.1 17.5 19.7 16.9 11.6 8.2 4.2 2.9 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Khayla Patel 0.8% 166.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Khayla Patel 23.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.6 1.4 1.3 3.2 3.7 4.4 5.7 6.7 6.7 5.6 6.9 6.9 5.5
Elsa Racasan 34.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.7 1.6 1.7 1.4 2.1 3.2
Lourdes Vivas di Lorenzi 47.6 0.1 0.2 0.1
Anna Figueroa 98.7
Maddie Forbes 106.2
Sara Ivackoic 109.0
Ruby Watson 110.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 0.1% 0.1 5
6 0.9% 0.9 6
7 16.1% 16.1 7
8 17.5% 17.5 8
9 19.7% 19.7 9
10 16.9% 16.9 10
11 11.6% 11.6 11
12 8.2% 8.2 12
13 4.2% 4.2 13
14 2.9% 2.9 14
15 1.2% 1.2 15
16 0.7% 0.7 16
17 0.3% 0.3 17
18 0.1% 0.1 18
19 0.1% 0.1 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0