Citadel
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,740  Amber Opp FR 22:16
2,302  Casey Miller FR 22:57
2,489  Grace Jenkins SR 23:14
2,962  Kenslee Padgett FR 24:28
3,037  Bethany Reeves JR 24:44
3,054  Jordan Neeley SO 24:48
3,113  Shona Sulzbach JR 25:13
National Rank #298 of 348
Southeast Region Rank #42 of 50
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 41st at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Amber Opp Casey Miller Grace Jenkins Kenslee Padgett Bethany Reeves Jordan Neeley Shona Sulzbach
Winthrop/Adidas Invitational 09/16 1420 21:56 22:48 23:00 24:44 24:51 25:32
Will Wilson Citadel Invitational 09/30 1395 22:00 22:43 22:38 24:43 24:44 24:25 25:18
ECU Pirates Invitational 10/13 1447 22:06 22:49 24:09 24:31 24:43 25:10 25:14
Southern Conference Championship 10/28 1419 22:35 22:58 23:07 24:18 24:54 24:47 24:59
Southeast Region Championships 11/10 22:29 23:18





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 41.2 1209



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Amber Opp 180.3
Casey Miller 222.4
Grace Jenkins 237.1
Kenslee Padgett 282.3
Bethany Reeves 290.4
Jordan Neeley 292.4
Shona Sulzbach 301.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 0.1% 0.1 34
35 35
36 0.2% 0.2 36
37 1.2% 1.2 37
38 3.8% 3.8 38
39 8.6% 8.6 39
40 17.1% 17.1 40
41 25.6% 25.6 41
42 22.0% 22.0 42
43 14.2% 14.2 43
44 7.3% 7.3 44
45 0.1% 0.1 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
50 50
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0