Vanderbilt
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
947  Jake Van Geffen JR 33:42
1,339  Nick French SR 34:17
1,664  Jason Vincze FR 34:47
1,999  Evan Suzman FR 35:20
2,115  Sam Reilly SR 35:34
2,192  Nikolaos Gkotsis JR 35:46
2,242  Daniel Arthur JR 35:52
2,416  Caleb Casolaro FR 36:21
2,486  Waqqas Fazili FR 36:34
2,750  Sam DeFabrizio SO 37:52
National Rank #214 of 308
South Region Rank #19 of 40
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 18th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 99.5%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Jake Van Geffen Nick French Jason Vincze Evan Suzman Sam Reilly Nikolaos Gkotsis Daniel Arthur Caleb Casolaro Waqqas Fazili Sam DeFabrizio
Joe Piane Notre Dame Invitational (Gold) 10/02 1261 33:30 34:18 34:48 35:30 35:54 36:19 36:10 38:09
Alabama Crimson Classic Invitational 10/16 1247 33:57 34:17 34:26 35:04 35:42 35:29 35:54 36:03 37:19 37:32
SEC Championships 10/30 1270 33:42 34:14 34:55 36:11 35:42 35:52 36:37 36:07
South Region Championships 11/13 1248 33:46 34:24 35:01 34:49 35:21 36:31 37:03





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 18.2 567 0.1 1.8 25.2 33.4 31.9 7.1 0.5 0.0 0.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jake Van Geffen 65.5
Nick French 96.6
Jason Vincze 117.0
Evan Suzman 137.2
Sam Reilly 146.5
Nikolaos Gkotsis 153.1
Daniel Arthur 156.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 0.1% 0.1 15
16 1.8% 1.8 16
17 25.2% 25.2 17
18 33.4% 33.4 18
19 31.9% 31.9 19
20 7.1% 7.1 20
21 0.5% 0.5 21
22 0.0% 0.0 22
23 0.0% 0.0 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0