Auburn
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
328  Kevin Wyss SR 32:30
407  Coleman Churitch SR 32:39
669  Wesley Curles SR 33:08
678  Wesley Pectol SR 33:09
772  Mitchell Gomez SR 33:20
1,126  Erik Armes SO 33:49
1,158  Jay Spieler SR 33:51
1,713  Tommy McDonough FR 34:38
1,793  Andy Smith SO 34:46
2,178  Jack Rogers FR 35:29
National Rank #91 of 315
South Region Rank #13 of 41
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 9th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 9.6%
Top 10 in Regional 74.6%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Kevin Wyss Coleman Churitch Wesley Curles Wesley Pectol Mitchell Gomez Erik Armes Jay Spieler Tommy McDonough Andy Smith Jack Rogers
Bulldog SEC Preview 09/09 1101 32:45 33:20 33:05 34:23 36:20
Louisville Classic (Gold) 09/30 979 32:23 32:47 32:38 33:17 33:42 33:20 34:29 34:58 34:44 35:07
Crimson Classic 10/13 925 32:51 32:18 32:25 32:50 33:17 33:38 33:30 34:34 35:02 35:18
SEC Championship 10/27 1005 32:44 32:12 33:11 33:44 33:47 34:22 33:48 34:44 34:30 35:34
South Region Championships 11/10 941 32:01 32:47 34:25 33:01 32:55 34:11 33:21





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0% 31.0 945 0.1
Region Championship 100% 8.8 253 0.1 0.4 2.2 6.9 10.0 12.0 13.4 15.3 14.4 11.6 8.9 3.6 1.2 0.2 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Kevin Wyss 0.1% 193.0
Coleman Churitch 0.0% 219.5
Wesley Curles 0.0% 232.5
Wesley Pectol 0.0% 212.5
Mitchell Gomez 0.0% 244.5
Erik Armes 0.0% 243.5
Jay Spieler 0.0% 235.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Kevin Wyss 27.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 1.1 1.2 1.7 2.5 3.0 3.2 3.2 3.8 3.8 3.7 4.3 4.0 4.2
Coleman Churitch 32.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.6 2.5 2.8 3.6 3.5 4.3
Wesley Curles 53.8 0.1 0.1 0.1
Wesley Pectol 55.5 0.1 0.1
Mitchell Gomez 67.0
Erik Armes 97.7
Jay Spieler 101.2




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 0.1% 100.0% 0.1 0.1 2
3 0.4% 0.4 3
4 2.2% 2.2 4
5 6.9% 6.9 5
6 10.0% 10.0 6
7 12.0% 12.0 7
8 13.4% 13.4 8
9 15.3% 15.3 9
10 14.4% 14.4 10
11 11.6% 11.6 11
12 8.9% 8.9 12
13 3.6% 3.6 13
14 1.2% 1.2 14
15 0.2% 0.2 15
16 16
17 17
18 0.1% 0.1 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
Total 100% 0.1% 0.1 100.0 0.1 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Princeton 69.0% 1.0 0.7
Texas A&M 0.5% 1.0 0.0
Belmont 0.1% 2.0 0.0
Lipscomb 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.7
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 3.0