Iowa
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
247  Nathan Mylenek SO 32:18
377  Daniel Soto JR 32:36
594  Brandon Cooley SO 33:01
615  Ian Eklin JR 33:03
643  Bailey Hesse-Withbroe JR 33:06
791  Daniel Murphy JR 33:22
971  Luke Sampson SO 33:36
1,124  Karson Sommer SO 33:49
1,227  Daniel Gardarsson JR 33:57
National Rank #72 of 315
Midwest Region Rank #8 of 33
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.5%
Most Likely Finish 7th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 7.8%
Top 10 in Regional 95.4%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Nathan Mylenek Daniel Soto Brandon Cooley Ian Eklin Bailey Hesse-Withbroe Daniel Murphy Luke Sampson Karson Sommer Daniel Gardarsson
Woody Greeno/Jay Dirksen 09/16 897 32:20 32:26 32:51 32:23 33:23 34:40 33:44 34:42
Joe Piane Invitational (Blue) 09/29 877 32:06 32:31 32:35 32:52 33:01 33:22 34:20 33:49
Bradley Pink Classic 10/13 837 31:45 32:29 32:54 33:59 32:36 33:29 33:01 33:28
Big Ten Championship 10/29 942 32:25 32:34 33:03 32:59 32:48 33:08 33:29 33:42 33:58
Midwest Region Championships 11/10 1051 32:37 32:50 33:17 33:21 33:24 33:47 33:32





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.5% 29.5 767 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2
Region Championship 100% 7.5 241 0.3 1.6 6.0 22.1 24.8 21.1 12.6 7.1 2.9 1.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Nathan Mylenek 11.6% 147.5
Daniel Soto 0.9% 191.3
Brandon Cooley 0.5% 209.0
Ian Eklin 0.5% 228.0
Bailey Hesse-Withbroe 0.5% 212.0
Daniel Murphy 0.5% 233.0
Luke Sampson 0.5% 240.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Nathan Mylenek 19.6 0.1 0.5 0.8 1.4 2.3 2.2 2.7 2.9 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.8 3.1 3.1 3.5 3.4 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.0 1.9 2.4 2.4 2.3
Daniel Soto 34.5 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.2 0.9 2.3 1.8 2.1 1.9 1.7 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.3
Brandon Cooley 57.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2
Ian Eklin 59.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2
Bailey Hesse-Withbroe 61.2 0.1 0.1
Daniel Murphy 78.2
Luke Sampson 92.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 0.3% 100.0% 0.2 0.1 0.3 3
4 1.6% 15.6% 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.4 0.3 4
5 6.0% 6.0 5
6 22.1% 22.1 6
7 24.8% 24.8 7
8 21.1% 21.1 8
9 12.6% 12.6 9
10 7.1% 7.1 10
11 2.9% 2.9 11
12 1.3% 1.3 12
13 0.2% 0.2 13
14 0.2% 0.2 14
15 0.1% 0.1 15
16 0.1% 0.1 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
Total 100% 0.5% 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 99.5 0.0 0.5




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Florida State 23.7% 1.0 0.2
Butler 0.3% 1.0 0.0
Bradley 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Nebraska 0.1% 2.0 0.0
Total 0.2
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 2.0