Texas A&M
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
190  Christian Farris SR 32:07
290  Alex Riba SR 32:25
324  Jon Bishop SO 32:30
712  Ryan Yerrow FR 33:14
858  Brandt Preston SO 33:28
870  Jacob Perry JR 33:29
1,256  Taylor Clayton JR 34:00
1,355  Zephyr Seagraves FR 34:08
1,392  Ryan Trahan FR 34:10
1,417  Eli Canal JR 34:11
1,444  Sam Erickson JR 34:14
National Rank #60 of 315
South Central Region Rank #3 of 36
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.5%
Most Likely Finish 3rd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.1%
Top 5 in Regional 99.3%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Christian Farris Alex Riba Jon Bishop Ryan Yerrow Brandt Preston Jacob Perry Taylor Clayton Zephyr Seagraves Ryan Trahan Eli Canal Sam Erickson
Bulldog SEC Preview 09/09 970 32:42 32:41 32:50 32:50 34:28 33:08 34:00 33:16 34:10
Texas A&M Invitational 09/23 934 32:40 32:13 33:02 32:37 33:25 33:24 33:34 34:04 33:40 34:27 34:07
Crimson Classic 10/13 826 31:57 32:07 32:12 33:34 33:26 33:46 34:32 34:38 34:47 34:00 33:54
SEC Championship 10/27 936 31:43 32:24 34:11 33:24 33:54 33:49 33:49 34:30 34:58
South Region Championships 11/10 800 31:52 32:42 31:50 32:59 33:14 33:52 35:09





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.5% 28.5 736 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1
Region Championship 100% 3.2 135 0.1 0.5 86.5 10.5 1.9 0.4 0.4 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Christian Farris 59.8% 135.1
Alex Riba 20.2% 170.5
Jon Bishop 11.8% 177.3
Ryan Yerrow 0.5% 226.0
Brandt Preston 0.5% 234.0
Jacob Perry 0.5% 242.0
Taylor Clayton 0.5% 246.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Christian Farris 9.7 0.2 0.6 1.9 3.4 5.2 7.6 9.4 8.4 9.3 6.4 7.1 5.2 4.9 4.0 3.4 3.6 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.1 1.2 1.5 1.9 1.1 1.1
Alex Riba 15.7 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.8 1.6 2.2 3.3 4.1 4.8 5.7 5.3 5.9 6.6 5.4 5.9 5.0 4.3 4.8 3.4 3.6 3.5 3.0 2.7 1.9
Jon Bishop 17.6 0.1 0.4 0.5 1.2 2.3 2.0 3.8 4.7 5.1 5.7 6.5 4.8 4.9 6.0 4.5 5.2 4.5 4.0 4.5 3.6 3.1 3.1
Ryan Yerrow 38.7 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 1.4 1.1
Brandt Preston 49.8 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Jacob Perry 49.8 0.1 0.1
Taylor Clayton 78.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 0.1% 100.0% 0.1 0.1 1
2 0.5% 100.0% 0.5 0.5 2
3 86.5% 86.5 3
4 10.5% 10.5 4
5 1.9% 1.9 5
6 0.4% 0.4 6
7 0.4% 0.4 7
8 8
9 9
10 0.1% 0.1 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
Total 100% 0.5% 0.1 0.5 99.5 0.5 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Tennessee 1.2% 1.0 0.0
Georgia Tech 0.6% 1.0 0.0
Georgia 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Auburn 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 1.0