Bryant
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,731  Elizabeth Wilmonton SO 22:24
1,815  Erin Svensen SR 22:30
1,849  Emily McNeil JR 22:32
2,223  Sarah Lapham SO 23:00
2,520  Staci Rezendes SR 23:26
2,642  Brittany Sarza SR 23:41
3,072  Emma Washo FR 25:02
National Rank #258 of 339
Northeast Region Rank #34 of 43
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 34th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Elizabeth Wilmonton Erin Svensen Emily McNeil Sarah Lapham Staci Rezendes Brittany Sarza Emma Washo
Paul Short Invitational (Brown) 10/02 1316 22:21 22:42 22:33 22:59 23:57 23:31 24:41
NEICAAA Championship 10/10 1290 23:07 22:18 22:23 22:59 23:21 24:17
Northeast Conference Championship 10/31 1319 22:13 22:17 22:45 23:14 23:26 23:26 25:28
Northeast Region Championships 11/13 1312 22:17 22:49 22:37 22:55 23:17 23:48





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 34.4 1029 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 1.2



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Elizabeth Wilmonton 182.3
Erin Svensen 190.1
Emily McNeil 192.5
Sarah Lapham 221.6
Staci Rezendes 246.0
Brittany Sarza 257.9
Emma Washo 285.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 0.0% 0.0 26
27 0.0% 0.0 27
28 0.0% 0.0 28
29 0.1% 0.1 29
30 0.4% 0.4 30
31 1.2% 1.2 31
32 3.2% 3.2 32
33 9.5% 9.5 33
34 49.9% 49.9 34
35 20.2% 20.2 35
36 9.9% 9.9 36
37 4.0% 4.0 37
38 1.3% 1.3 38
39 0.1% 0.1 39
40 0.0% 0.0 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0