UCLA
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
61  Carolina Johnson FR 19:52
630  Julia Rizk FR 21:06
709  Emily Scharmann SO 21:13
751  Aliya Shirif JR 21:16
844  Veronica Yamane SO 21:23
869  Ashlee Powers JR 21:25
1,274  Taylor Taite FR 21:54
1,346  Sabrina Seay SO 21:58
1,481  Emily Fieberling SO 22:08
1,493  Jessica Cushing-Murray SO 22:09
1,502  Kelly Brooks SR 22:10
National Rank #85 of 339
West Region Rank #14 of 39
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 15th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 7.0%
Top 20 in Regional 99.6%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Carolina Johnson Julia Rizk Emily Scharmann Aliya Shirif Veronica Yamane Ashlee Powers Taylor Taite Sabrina Seay Emily Fieberling Jessica Cushing-Murray Kelly Brooks
Washington Invitational 10/02 1123 20:35 21:13 21:43 21:23 22:13 22:07 21:41 22:20 21:42 22:05
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/16 978 19:44 21:51 21:06 21:14 21:15 22:26 22:06
Titan Invitational 10/23 21:48 22:10
Pac 12 Championships 10/30 992 19:53 21:16 21:25 21:18 21:20 21:13 21:25 21:58 23:02 22:19
West Region Championships 11/13 954 20:02 20:54 21:13 20:57 22:03 21:15 22:05
NCAA Championship 11/21 19:55





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 14.1 413 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.9 2.0 3.8 6.4 10.3 13.8 16.4 17.2 13.8 8.7 3.8 1.6 0.6 0.3 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Carolina Johnson 69.2% 60.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Carolina Johnson 10.9 0.0 2.4 3.8 4.3 5.9 6.3 5.9 5.9 5.3 5.0 5.9 4.8 4.4 3.7 3.5 3.5 2.9 2.6 2.8 2.6 1.9 1.6 1.8 1.4 1.5
Julia Rizk 89.9
Emily Scharmann 99.1
Aliya Shirif 103.1
Veronica Yamane 113.9
Ashlee Powers 116.2
Taylor Taite 160.7




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 0.0% 0.0 5
6 0.1% 0.1 6
7 0.3% 0.3 7
8 0.9% 0.9 8
9 2.0% 2.0 9
10 3.8% 3.8 10
11 6.4% 6.4 11
12 10.3% 10.3 12
13 13.8% 13.8 13
14 16.4% 16.4 14
15 17.2% 17.2 15
16 13.8% 13.8 16
17 8.7% 8.7 17
18 3.8% 3.8 18
19 1.6% 1.6 19
20 0.6% 0.6 20
21 0.3% 0.3 21
22 0.1% 0.1 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0