Nebraska
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
654  Bonnie Smith SR 21:04
843  Erika Freyhof FR 21:18
1,107  Katrina Santiago SR 21:35
1,122  Rachel Brush SO 21:36
1,315  Elsa Forsberg SO 21:49
1,389  Judi Jones SO 21:53
1,463  Anna Peer SR 21:57
2,049  Nicole Colonna JR 22:36
2,134  Kendall Cast SR 22:42
2,336  Kaitlynn Johnson FR 23:00
National Rank #172 of 348
Midwest Region Rank #23 of 37
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 21st at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.6%
Top 20 in Regional 48.4%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Bonnie Smith Erika Freyhof Katrina Santiago Rachel Brush Elsa Forsberg Judi Jones Anna Peer Nicole Colonna Kendall Cast Kaitlynn Johnson
Woody Greeno/Jay Dirksen 09/16 1163 21:07 21:27 21:26 21:09 22:23 21:42 22:12 22:38 22:54 23:10
Sam Bell Invitational 09/30 1188 21:07 21:18 21:34 22:14 21:53 21:37 23:01
Bradley Pink Classic 10/13 1135 20:29 21:26 21:37 22:36 21:51 22:19 22:19
Big Ten Championship 10/29 1176 21:12 21:12 21:48 21:20 21:24 22:05 23:17 22:14 22:52
Midwest Region Championships 11/10 1168 21:06 21:10 21:53 21:09 21:37 21:49 23:02





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 20.3 546 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.7 1.4 2.8 2.8 5.7 5.9 5.7 7.1 6.5 9.6 10.3 9.0 8.5 7.2 6.0 6.3 3.3 1.0 0.2 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Bonnie Smith 69.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3
Erika Freyhof 93.5
Katrina Santiago 122.6
Rachel Brush 124.1
Elsa Forsberg 146.1
Judi Jones 153.3
Anna Peer 160.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 0.1% 0.1 8
9 0.1% 0.1 9
10 0.4% 0.4 10
11 0.7% 0.7 11
12 1.4% 1.4 12
13 2.8% 2.8 13
14 2.8% 2.8 14
15 5.7% 5.7 15
16 5.9% 5.9 16
17 5.7% 5.7 17
18 7.1% 7.1 18
19 6.5% 6.5 19
20 9.6% 9.6 20
21 10.3% 10.3 21
22 9.0% 9.0 22
23 8.5% 8.5 23
24 7.2% 7.2 24
25 6.0% 6.0 25
26 6.3% 6.3 26
27 3.3% 3.3 27
28 1.0% 1.0 28
29 0.2% 0.2 29
30 0.1% 0.1 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0