Columbia
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
161  Jack Boyle SR 32:04
205  Kenny Vasbinder FR 32:15
263  Brian Zabilski SO 32:24
301  Max Norris SR 32:30
334  Rob Napolitano SR 32:36
436  Spencer Haik JR 32:49
493  Tal Braude SO 32:55
531  Ryan Thomas JR 32:58
643  Dylan Tarpey JR 33:11
763  Brandon Marquez FR 33:24
777  Tommy Rooney JR 33:26
800  George Miao JR 33:28
904  Jonah Hanig SR 33:35
995  Ryan Dearie FR 33:44
1,050  Keenan Piper SR 33:48
1,127  Dan Schumacher SO 33:56
1,329  Mike McClemens JR 34:11
1,941  Johain Ounadjela SO 35:02
National Rank #42 of 312
Northeast Region Rank #4 of 41
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 19.9%
Most Likely Finish 4th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 1.6%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 89.0%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Jack Boyle Kenny Vasbinder Brian Zabilski Max Norris Rob Napolitano Spencer Haik Tal Braude Ryan Thomas Dylan Tarpey Brandon Marquez Tommy Rooney
Stony Brook Invitational 2 09/10 681 32:12 32:13 32:12 32:12 32:14 32:41 32:13 32:13 33:52 33:32
Iona Br. Paddy Doyle Meet of Champions 09/16 1165 33:32
Paul Short Invitational (Gold) 10/01 788 31:51 32:46 32:44 32:33 32:25 33:00 32:33 33:16 33:07
Metropolitan Conference Championships 10/07 1120
Nuttycombe Wisconsin Invitational 10/14 804 31:31 32:36 32:32 34:13 33:16 32:37 33:13
Princeton Invitational 10/15 1080 32:59 33:09 33:06 33:39
Ivy League Championship 10/29 750 32:19 32:11 32:15 32:40 32:16 32:39 33:10 35:00 32:47 33:40
Northeast Region Championships 11/11 658 33:28 31:49 31:44 32:18 32:32 32:27 33:21





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 19.9% 26.1 636 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.9 1.2 0.7 1.0 1.4 2.4 2.6 2.3 2.4 2.2 1.5
Region Championship 100% 4.1 137 1.6 30.2 35.4 21.8 8.5 2.0 0.5 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jack Boyle 61.8% 123.6
Kenny Vasbinder 40.5% 143.1
Brian Zabilski 27.3% 165.0
Max Norris 22.0% 171.5
Rob Napolitano 20.7% 184.9
Spencer Haik 19.9% 209.0
Tal Braude 19.9% 215.9


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jack Boyle 14.2 0.2 0.4 1.0 1.6 2.5 3.6 5.3 5.3 6.7 6.5 5.9 5.6 4.9 4.1 3.3 3.7 2.7 3.2 3.1 2.4 2.4 2.3 1.7 1.5
Kenny Vasbinder 20.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.7 0.5 1.3 2.7 3.1 4.3 3.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.6 4.4 3.8 3.5 3.6 3.3 3.1 3.0 3.1
Brian Zabilski 26.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.1 1.0 2.0 2.4 2.4 3.0 2.9 3.5 3.2 3.5 4.0 4.4 3.8 3.1 3.2 3.3
Max Norris 32.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.9 2.7 2.1 3.2 3.0 2.6 3.7 2.8 3.3
Rob Napolitano 35.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.6 1.0 1.5 1.7 1.5 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.9 2.8
Spencer Haik 48.2 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.8 0.5
Tal Braude 53.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 1.6% 100.0% 1.6 1.6 2
3 30.2% 59.4% 0.9 2.2 2.1 2.5 2.0 2.0 1.6 1.7 1.4 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 12.3 18.0 3
4 35.4% 0.8% 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 35.1 0.3 4
5 21.8% 0.2% 0.1 21.8 0.1 5
6 8.5% 8.5 6
7 2.0% 2.0 7
8 0.5% 0.5 8
9 0.1% 0.1 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
Total 100% 19.9% 1.6 0.9 2.2 2.1 2.5 2.1 2.0 1.7 1.7 1.4 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.6 80.1 1.6 18.3




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Eastern Kentucky 82.3% 1.0 0.8
Princeton 43.8% 1.0 0.4
Texas A&M 43.0% 1.0 0.4
Navy 38.0% 1.0 0.4
Illinois 32.4% 1.0 0.3
Georgia 4.7% 1.0 0.0
Dartmouth 0.7% 2.0 0.0
Brown 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 2.5
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 6.0