Oklahoma State
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
78  Hassan Abdi JR 31:45
80  Joshua Thompson JR 31:45
156  Sylvester Barus JR 32:03
168  Luis Martinez JR 32:06
216  Christian Liddell SO 32:17
240  Anthoney Armstrong JR 32:20
614  Matthew Fayers JR 33:08
816  Brigham Hedges JR 33:29
980  noah gade SR 33:42
1,119  Sukhi Khosla FR 33:55
National Rank #19 of 312
Midwest Region Rank #2 of 33
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 82.1%
Most Likely Finish 18th at Nationals


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.5%
Top 10 at Nationals 7.9%
Top 20 at Nationals 53.6%


Regional Champion 37.9%
Top 5 in Regional 97.6%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Hassan Abdi Joshua Thompson Sylvester Barus Luis Martinez Christian Liddell Anthoney Armstrong Matthew Fayers Brigham Hedges noah gade Sukhi Khosla
OSU Cowboy Jamboree 09/24 378 31:17 30:22 31:55 31:32 32:31 33:27 33:34 34:20 34:14
Penn State National Open 10/14 589 31:41 31:50 32:22 32:08 32:32 32:11 32:58 33:11 33:08 33:49
Big 12 Championship 10/29 589 31:54 32:01 32:28 31:57 32:11 32:10 32:59 33:06 34:02 33:47
Midwest Region Championships 11/11 510 31:40 31:36 32:00 32:24 32:06 32:09 33:43





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 82.1% 17.9 460 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.7 0.6 1.2 2.0 3.1 3.9 4.0 4.8 4.2 4.7 4.5 5.3 5.4 4.9 4.2 5.0 4.7 3.8 3.8 3.0 2.5 2.3 1.8 0.9 0.8 0.1
Region Championship 100% 2.2 84 37.9 31.4 14.4 9.3 4.6 2.0 0.3 0.2



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Hassan Abdi 87.5% 74.3 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.5
Joshua Thompson 85.9% 76.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.7 0.4
Sylvester Barus 82.4% 120.9
Luis Martinez 82.3% 130.5
Christian Liddell 82.1% 155.7
Anthoney Armstrong 82.1% 164.8
Matthew Fayers 82.3% 235.9


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Hassan Abdi 7.1 3.8 9.3 8.9 8.5 7.4 6.2 5.4 5.1 4.3 3.3 4.2 3.1 2.4 2.4 2.9 1.9 1.3 1.6 1.7 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.2 0.5
Joshua Thompson 7.2 3.4 9.0 10.4 7.9 7.3 5.1 5.8 5.6 4.2 4.5 3.5 2.9 2.7 2.4 2.2 2.6 1.8 1.7 2.0 1.4 1.1 1.3 0.6 0.8 0.7
Sylvester Barus 16.6 0.3 1.5 2.1 2.6 2.8 3.6 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.1 3.6 4.2 3.1 3.5 3.1 2.8 2.9 2.5 3.0 2.6 1.8 2.2 2.4
Luis Martinez 18.6 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.5 1.6 2.8 2.4 3.3 3.8 3.5 3.3 4.0 4.2 4.2 4.0 3.8 3.4 3.5 2.5 3.1 2.5 2.7 2.4 2.0 2.0
Christian Liddell 25.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.9 0.8 1.9 2.0 2.7 2.6 3.2 3.2 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.9 3.1 3.5 2.7 2.5 3.0 3.0
Anthoney Armstrong 29.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.7 0.6 0.8 1.3 1.3 1.7 1.8 3.0 2.7 2.6 2.3 3.4 2.9 2.7 2.6 3.4 3.5 2.5
Matthew Fayers 73.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 37.9% 100.0% 37.9 37.9 1
2 31.4% 100.0% 31.4 31.4 2
3 14.4% 59.7% 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.3 0.8 0.8 1.0 5.8 8.6 3
4 9.3% 36.8% 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 5.9 3.4 4
5 4.6% 14.1% 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 4.0 0.7 5
6 2.0% 5.1% 0.1 0.1 1.9 0.1 6
7 0.3% 0.3 7
8 0.2% 0.2 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
Total 100% 82.1% 37.9 31.4 0.7 1.1 1.4 1.0 0.6 0.8 0.9 0.8 1.0 0.6 1.2 1.3 1.7 18.0 69.3 12.8




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Mississippi 100.0% 1.0 1.0
Iowa State 95.0% 1.0 1.0
Tulsa 68.5% 1.0 0.7
Texas 56.7% 2.0 1.1
Virginia 49.8% 1.0 0.5
Virginia Tech 0.9% 1.0 0.0
Baylor 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Kansas 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 4.3
Minimum 1.0
Maximum 7.0