Liberty
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
25  Azaria Kirwa JR 31:19
380  Samuel Proctor SR 32:36
385  James Zentmeyer JR 32:36
523  Nick Doan SO 32:53
754  Augostine Lisoreng FR 33:18
850  Graham Hansel SR 33:27
1,118  Ben Klemmeck FR 33:48
1,301  Louis Paone JR 34:04
1,371  Jack Tidball JR 34:09
1,451  Colin Schutz SR 34:15
National Rank #51 of 315
Southeast Region Rank #9 of 48
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.3%
Most Likely Finish 8th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 6.0%
Top 10 in Regional 90.9%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Azaria Kirwa Samuel Proctor James Zentmeyer Nick Doan Augostine Lisoreng Graham Hansel Ben Klemmeck Louis Paone Jack Tidball Colin Schutz
Big South Conference Preview 09/16 949 32:30 32:38 32:44 33:16 32:54 33:54 33:34 33:54
Paul Short Gold 09/29 812 31:26 32:38 32:47 32:27 33:25 33:35 33:47 34:54
Pre-Nationals (Black) 10/14 33:37 34:06
Pre-Nationals (Red) 10/14 736 30:58 32:17 32:37 32:26 33:48 34:04 33:25
Big South Championship 10/28 874 30:58 33:22 32:31 34:42 33:25 33:34 33:46 35:15 34:05 34:12
Southeast Region Championships 11/10 765 30:47 32:33 32:25 32:57 33:11 34:27





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.3% 27.6 697 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Region Championship 100% 8.3 269 0.4 1.7 4.0 8.9 17.3 22.8 22.4 13.7 5.4 2.9 0.9



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Azaria Kirwa 96.8% 48.6 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.7 1.2 0.9 1.3 1.7 1.1 1.3 1.8 2.3 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.4
Samuel Proctor 0.3% 169.5
James Zentmeyer 0.3% 184.5
Nick Doan 0.3% 206.5
Augostine Lisoreng 0.3% 232.5
Graham Hansel 0.3% 241.5
Ben Klemmeck 0.4% 246.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Azaria Kirwa 5.5 3.5 10.2 14.1 11.1 8.1 6.7 5.8 4.4 5.2 4.5 3.1 3.1 2.7 1.6 2.2 1.6 1.9 1.4 1.3 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.9
Samuel Proctor 49.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.2
James Zentmeyer 49.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3
Nick Doan 64.4
Augostine Lisoreng 90.1
Graham Hansel 97.8
Ben Klemmeck 118.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 0.4% 57.1% 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 3
4 1.7% 9.1% 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.5 0.2 4
5 4.0% 4.0 5
6 8.9% 8.9 6
7 17.3% 17.3 7
8 22.8% 22.8 8
9 22.4% 22.4 9
10 13.7% 13.7 10
11 5.4% 5.4 11
12 2.9% 2.9 12
13 0.9% 0.9 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
Total 100% 0.4% 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 99.7 0.0 0.4




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Georgetown 31.5% 1.0 0.3
Villanova 2.0% 1.0 0.0
Tennessee 1.2% 2.0 0.0
Georgia Tech 0.6% 1.0 0.0
Army West Point 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Georgia 0.1% 2.0 0.0
Total 0.4
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 3.0