Georgetown
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
57  Jonathan Green SR 31:32
337  Amos Bartelsmeyer SR 32:31
382  Nicholas Wareham FR 32:36
461  Reilly Bloomer SO 32:44
499  Jack Van Scoter SO 32:50
555  Spencer Brown SO 32:56
565  Nicholas Golebiowski JR 32:58
683  Matthew Bouthillette SO 33:10
918  Charles Cooper JR 33:32
998  Jack Salisbury FR 33:38
1,236  Eion Nohilly FR 33:59
1,270  Adam Barnard SO 34:01
1,851  Johnathan Chavez FR 34:52
National Rank #45 of 315
Mid-Atlantic Region Rank #2 of 32
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 31.5%
Most Likely Finish 3rd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.8%


Regional Champion 11.3%
Top 5 in Regional 89.5%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Jonathan Green Amos Bartelsmeyer Nicholas Wareham Reilly Bloomer Jack Van Scoter Spencer Brown Nicholas Golebiowski Matthew Bouthillette Charles Cooper Jack Salisbury Eion Nohilly
Paul Short Gold 09/29 704 31:34 32:13 32:37 32:03 33:18 32:57 33:46
Pre-Nationals (Black) 10/14 1194 33:05 33:35 33:58
Pre-Nationals (Red) 10/14 813 31:08 32:56 33:17 32:33 33:05 32:49 33:27
Big East Championship 10/28 800 31:49 33:08 32:32 32:20 32:40 32:54 33:51 33:24 33:39
Mid-Atlantic Region Championships 11/10 817 31:58 32:22 32:41 32:52 33:26 32:31 32:53





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 31.5% 27.9 694 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.6 1.0 1.2 2.1 2.5 3.4 4.3 4.6 5.0 6.1
Region Championship 100% 3.4 115 11.3 20.2 21.8 20.2 16.2 7.5 2.7 0.4 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jonathan Green 94.4% 53.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.8 1.1 1.0 1.5 0.9 1.2 1.2 1.2
Amos Bartelsmeyer 32.7% 181.0
Nicholas Wareham 31.6% 190.8
Reilly Bloomer 31.5% 206.4
Jack Van Scoter 31.5% 215.6
Spencer Brown 31.5% 224.2
Nicholas Golebiowski 31.6% 224.9


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jonathan Green 1.0 67.8 10.5 5.3 4.6 2.7 1.6 1.3 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Amos Bartelsmeyer 21.0 0.1 0.2 0.8 1.1 1.8 2.2 3.6 3.1 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.4 3.8 2.9 3.3 3.2 2.5 3.2 3.1 2.1 3.0 2.5 1.8 1.9
Nicholas Wareham 25.6 0.1 0.3 0.8 0.6 1.1 1.2 1.2 2.3 2.3 2.5 3.0 3.4 3.3 3.1 3.1 2.8 2.6 3.2 2.7 2.4 2.5 2.7 1.8
Reilly Bloomer 31.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.6 1.4 1.0 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.3
Jack Van Scoter 38.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.7 1.0 1.6 1.3 1.6 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.6 2.2 2.5
Spencer Brown 43.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.6
Nicholas Golebiowski 43.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.9 0.6 1.0 0.9 1.3 1.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 11.3% 100.0% 11.3 11.3 1
2 20.2% 100.0% 20.2 20.2 2
3 21.8% 0.2% 0.1 21.7 0.1 3
4 20.2% 20.2 4
5 16.2% 16.2 5
6 7.5% 7.5 6
7 2.7% 2.7 7
8 0.4% 0.4 8
9 9
10 0.1% 0.1 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
Total 100% 31.5% 11.3 20.2 0.1 68.6 31.4 0.1




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Penn 37.5% 1.0 0.4
Navy 32.9% 1.0 0.3
Villanova 2.0% 2.0 0.0
Tennessee 1.2% 1.0 0.0
Georgia Tech 0.6% 1.0 0.0
Butler 0.3% 1.0 0.0
Army West Point 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Georgia 0.1% 2.0 0.0
Total 0.8
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 4.0