Tulsa
Men
-
Women
2014
-
2015 -
2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
85 |
Rachel Baptista |
SR |
19:59 |
297 |
Nicole Lee |
SO |
20:35 |
319 |
Stacie Taylor |
JR |
20:37 |
480 |
Clara Langley |
JR |
20:53 |
673 |
Danielle Medearis |
SO |
21:10 |
847 |
Alyssa Bolliger |
FR |
21:23 |
1,866 |
Emma Galbraith |
JR |
22:33 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.3% |
Regional Champion |
0.1% |
Top 5 in Regional |
52.6% |
Top 10 in Regional |
98.6% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Rachel Baptista |
Nicole Lee |
Stacie Taylor |
Clara Langley |
Danielle Medearis |
Alyssa Bolliger |
Emma Galbraith |
Chile Pepper Festival |
10/02 |
1071 |
20:44 |
21:13 |
21:05 |
20:51 |
|
21:22 |
21:56 |
Wisconsin adidas Invitational |
10/16 |
830 |
19:39 |
20:40 |
20:50 |
20:47 |
|
21:12 |
22:47 |
American Athletic Conference Championship |
10/31 |
912 |
20:24 |
20:38 |
20:33 |
21:00 |
21:23 |
21:15 |
22:35 |
Midwest Region Championships |
11/13 |
717 |
19:47 |
20:18 |
20:30 |
20:44 |
20:58 |
21:45 |
22:41 |
NCAA Championship |
11/21 |
803 |
19:54 |
20:26 |
20:24 |
21:17 |
21:13 |
21:44 |
22:39 |
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
12.9% |
27.6 |
673 |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
1.1 |
1.9 |
2.2 |
3.4 |
0.9 |
Region Championship |
100% |
5.7 |
212 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
4.6 |
21.8 |
25.8 |
20.4 |
12.7 |
7.3 |
4.1 |
1.4 |
0.9 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Rachel Baptista |
23.1% |
62.8 |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
Nicole Lee |
12.9% |
168.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stacie Taylor |
12.9% |
174.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clara Langley |
12.9% |
206.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Danielle Medearis |
12.9% |
231.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alyssa Bolliger |
12.9% |
243.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emma Galbraith |
13.2% |
252.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Rachel Baptista |
10.9 |
0.8 |
1.4 |
3.1 |
4.9 |
5.1 |
5.4 |
5.6 |
5.9 |
6.1 |
6.1 |
6.3 |
5.2 |
5.1 |
5.3 |
5.0 |
4.6 |
3.3 |
3.4 |
2.6 |
2.7 |
1.9 |
2.0 |
1.6 |
1.3 |
0.8 |
Nicole Lee |
32.7 |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
0.5 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
1.5 |
2.0 |
1.9 |
1.9 |
2.3 |
2.4 |
2.6 |
3.0 |
Stacie Taylor |
35.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.8 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
2.2 |
2.3 |
2.3 |
Clara Langley |
50.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
Danielle Medearis |
75.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
Alyssa Bolliger |
93.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emma Galbraith |
189.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
0.1% |
100.0% |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
1 |
2 |
0.4% |
100.0% |
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
2 |
3 |
4.6% |
79.9% |
| |
0.5 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.9 |
|
3.7 |
3 |
4 |
21.8% |
31.5% |
| |
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
0.7 |
0.9 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
14.9 |
|
6.9 |
4 |
5 |
25.8% |
7.4% |
| |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
23.9 |
|
1.9 |
5 |
6 |
20.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
12.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
7 |
8 |
7.3% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
4.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
1.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
0.9% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
0.3% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
0.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
Total |
100% |
12.9% |
0.1 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
1.0 |
1.4 |
1.4 |
1.7 |
1.5 |
1.2 |
1.2 |
0.9 |
1.2 |
87.1 |
0.4 |
12.4 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.