Alabama
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
210  Hannah Waggoner SR 20:20
259  Mckenzie Yanek FR 20:28
272  Hannah Capek FR 20:30
531  Caroline Barlow JR 20:59
545  Lizzy Danis FR 21:00
697  Emily Edwards JR 21:12
736  Rebecca Buteau FR 21:14
837  Jessica Gray SO 21:21
1,007  Nicole Gardner SO 21:32
1,193  Calli Coggins SO 21:44
1,210  Alison Ringle JR 21:45
1,287  Brittany Tolson FR 21:50
1,563  Sarah Mohan SO 22:07
1,579  Haley Wright FR 22:08
1,725  Kaitlin York SO 22:16
2,040  Brianna Koshy SO 22:36
2,260  Caroline Brooks FR 22:51
National Rank #58 of 344
South Region Rank #4 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 8.9%
Most Likely Finish 4th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.5%


Regional Champion 1.1%
Top 5 in Regional 79.9%
Top 10 in Regional 99.9%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Hannah Waggoner Mckenzie Yanek Hannah Capek Caroline Barlow Lizzy Danis Emily Edwards Rebecca Buteau Jessica Gray Nicole Gardner Calli Coggins Alison Ringle
Joe Piane Invitational (Blue) 09/30 914 20:17 20:34 21:13 21:35 21:10 21:09 21:35
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/14 845 20:20 20:29 20:51 20:34 21:08 20:56 21:40 21:23 21:21 22:14
SEC Championship 10/28 816 20:23 20:14 20:28 21:00 20:55 21:04 21:16 21:16 21:25 21:48
South Region Championships 11/11 931 20:28 20:45 20:35 20:56 21:04 21:43 21:55





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 8.9% 27.3 643 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.6 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3
Region Championship 100% 4.4 169 1.1 6.1 19.3 31.0 22.6 11.0 5.6 2.8 0.5 0.2 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Hannah Waggoner 11.9% 119.0 0.1
Mckenzie Yanek 9.8% 132.7
Hannah Capek 9.1% 138.0
Caroline Barlow 8.9% 211.0
Lizzy Danis 8.9% 217.2
Emily Edwards 8.9% 230.9
Rebecca Buteau 8.9% 233.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Hannah Waggoner 17.0 0.2 0.4 0.5 1.5 1.7 1.8 2.2 3.5 3.8 3.1 4.4 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.9 5.1 4.6 5.0 4.4 4.1 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.4 2.3
Mckenzie Yanek 22.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 1.2 1.3 1.4 2.1 2.0 2.0 3.1 3.3 4.0 3.6 3.2 4.3 3.7 4.0 4.6 4.1 4.2 3.9 3.8
Hannah Capek 24.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.9 1.5 1.4 2.1 2.2 2.3 3.3 3.3 4.1 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.6 4.2 4.4 3.7
Caroline Barlow 51.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4
Lizzy Danis 52.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.5
Emily Edwards 66.5 0.1 0.1
Rebecca Buteau 69.8 0.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1.1% 100.0% 1.1 1.1 1
2 6.1% 100.0% 6.1 6.1 2
3 19.3% 7.3% 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 17.9 1.4 3
4 31.0% 1.0% 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 30.7 0.3 4
5 22.6% 0.4% 0.1 22.5 0.1 5
6 11.0% 11.0 6
7 5.6% 5.6 7
8 2.8% 2.8 8
9 0.5% 0.5 9
10 0.2% 0.2 10
11 0.1% 0.1 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 8.9% 1.1 6.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 91.1 7.1 1.8




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Florida 27.8% 1.0 0.3
Kentucky 11.3% 2.0 0.2
Vanderbilt 6.1% 1.0 0.1
Texas 2.2% 1.0 0.0
Auburn 0.3% 2.0 0.0
Clemson 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Georgia 0.1% 2.0 0.0
Total 0.6
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 4.0