Georgetown
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
225  Paige Hofstad FR 20:22
266  Josette Norris JR 20:29
311  Kennedy Weisner JR 20:35
320  Autumn Eastman JR 20:36
363  Madeline Perez SO 20:42
376  Piper Donaghu JR 20:43
504  Sarah Cotton SR 20:57
592  Margie Cullen FR 21:04
863  Haley Pierce SR 21:23
1,024  Aleta Looker JR 21:33
National Rank #48 of 344
Mid-Atlantic Region Rank #5 of 38
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 37.9%
Most Likely Finish 4th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.2%
Top 20 at Nationals 4.2%


Regional Champion 1.6%
Top 5 in Regional 92.7%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Paige Hofstad Josette Norris Kennedy Weisner Autumn Eastman Madeline Perez Piper Donaghu Sarah Cotton Margie Cullen Haley Pierce Aleta Looker
Paul Short Invitational (Gold) 10/01 619 20:09 20:25 20:51 20:14 20:39 20:09 20:50 21:11
Nuttycombe Wisconsin Invitational (B Race) 10/14 21:00 21:33
Nuttycombe Wisconsin Invitational 10/14 831 20:26 20:33 20:40 20:44 20:36 21:04
Big East Conference Championships 10/28 750 20:32 20:30 20:15 20:25 20:44 20:58 21:44
Mid-Atlantic Region Championships 11/11 900 20:25 20:37 20:49 20:39 21:33 21:10 21:39





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 37.9% 27.0 646 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.9 1.8 2.2 2.4 4.1 3.6 6.5 8.8
Region Championship 100% 3.8 109 1.6 17.5 21.9 26.8 25.0 5.7 1.4 0.2 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Paige Hofstad 50.9% 144.3
Josette Norris 42.9% 159.9
Kennedy Weisner 39.9% 179.4
Autumn Eastman 39.5% 180.0
Madeline Perez 38.3% 191.4
Piper Donaghu 38.0% 192.1
Sarah Cotton 37.9% 220.1


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Paige Hofstad 14.8 0.1 0.7 0.6 1.3 2.3 2.6 4.0 5.2 5.6 6.0 6.3 5.2 5.7 5.8 4.9 5.1 5.2 4.8 3.9 3.0 3.1 3.6 2.2 1.4
Josette Norris 18.8 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.4 1.0 1.6 2.3 2.7 3.1 4.6 5.3 4.8 5.0 5.0 5.2 4.9 4.9 4.6 4.1 4.6 3.6 3.9 3.7
Kennedy Weisner 23.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 0.6 1.0 1.6 2.0 2.6 2.7 2.7 3.6 4.1 3.6 4.3 3.9 3.8 3.4 3.5 4.1 4.0 4.3
Autumn Eastman 23.9 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.9 1.4 1.4 2.1 2.2 2.8 3.4 3.4 4.2 3.0 3.8 4.0 4.5 4.4 4.0 3.8 3.7
Madeline Perez 27.8 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.9 0.9 1.1 2.2 1.9 2.1 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.9 3.5 3.7 3.8 4.3
Piper Donaghu 28.7 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.7 1.3 1.5 1.8 1.7 1.7 2.7 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.6 3.1 3.3 3.7
Sarah Cotton 40.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.3 1.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1.6% 100.0% 1.6 1.6 1
2 17.5% 100.0% 17.5 17.5 2
3 21.9% 49.1% 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.8 0.6 1.1 1.7 2.0 1.7 2.0 0.2 11.2 10.8 3
4 26.8% 18.5% 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.9 0.2 1.5 0.9 21.9 5.0 4
5 25.0% 11.2% 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 1.0 22.2 2.8 5
6 5.7% 5.3% 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 5.4 0.3 6
7 1.4% 1.4 7
8 0.2% 0.2 8
9 0.1% 0.1 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
Total 100% 37.9% 1.6 17.5 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.7 1.1 0.8 1.8 2.5 3.2 2.2 4.0 2.0 62.2 19.1 18.8




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Penn 68.6% 1.0 0.7
Villanova 62.9% 1.0 0.6
Florida 27.8% 1.0 0.3
West Virginia 27.1% 1.0 0.3
Vanderbilt 6.1% 1.0 0.1
Tulsa 3.4% 1.0 0.0
Cornell 2.7% 1.0 0.0
Butler 1.7% 1.0 0.0
Dartmouth 0.8% 1.0 0.0
Brown 0.6% 1.0 0.0
Georgia 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Florida State 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Northern Arizona 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Iona 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 2.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 5.0