Purdue
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
31  Emma Benner FR 19:41
113  Kiara McIntosh SR 20:05
413  Mary Abramson SO 20:47
700  Jenna Halderman SO 21:12
716  Grace Lachmund JR 21:13
732  Alyssa Christoffer JR 21:14
833  Kendall Hacker JR 21:21
1,362  Gabrielle Broschard SO 21:54
1,453  Rachel Yuska SO 21:59
1,605  Anna Dolce SO 22:09
1,721  Rachel Bales SO 22:16
2,100  Sarah Tyler JR 22:40
2,531  Kyra Ball FR 23:13
National Rank #46 of 344
Great Lakes Region Rank #8 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.6%
Most Likely Finish 9th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.1%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 2.6%
Top 10 in Regional 99.4%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Emma Benner Kiara McIntosh Mary Abramson Jenna Halderman Grace Lachmund Alyssa Christoffer Kendall Hacker Gabrielle Broschard Rachel Yuska Anna Dolce Rachel Bales
Indiana Intercollegiate Championships 09/16 819 19:41 20:19 20:54 21:04 21:55 21:12 22:40
Joe Piane Invitational (Blue) 09/30 729 19:48 19:56 20:31 21:06 21:18 21:17 21:26 21:55
ISU adidas Pre Nationals (Open) 10/15 1256 21:22 21:30 22:11 22:02
ISU adidas Pre Nationals (Blue) 10/15 737 19:42 19:48 20:49 21:14 21:05 21:35 21:54
Illini Open 10/21 22:21 22:14
Big 10 Championship 10/30 700 19:33 20:03 20:37 21:36 20:55 21:27 20:59 21:23 22:32
Great Lakes Region Championships 11/11 803 19:45 20:09 21:08 21:07 20:56 21:22 22:11





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.6% 24.5 558 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1
Region Championship 100% 7.9 229 0.1 0.1 0.7 1.8 10.5 20.4 30.5 31.7 3.9 0.4 0.2 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Emma Benner 98.1% 41.6 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.7 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.0 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.8 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.6
Kiara McIntosh 32.7% 88.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1
Mary Abramson 0.7% 179.5
Jenna Halderman 0.6% 228.8
Grace Lachmund 0.6% 223.3
Alyssa Christoffer 0.6% 222.5
Kendall Hacker 0.6% 234.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Emma Benner 5.6 0.4 3.1 15.0 14.4 11.2 9.7 9.4 8.0 5.0 5.1 3.3 3.5 1.7 2.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.6 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.2
Kiara McIntosh 16.7 0.3 0.8 1.7 2.0 2.8 4.0 3.7 3.9 5.0 4.5 5.3 4.3 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.2 4.9 3.5 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.5 2.8
Mary Abramson 52.6 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.4
Jenna Halderman 79.8
Grace Lachmund 81.3
Alyssa Christoffer 82.5 0.1
Kendall Hacker 89.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 0.1% 100.0% 0.1 0.1 2
3 0.1% 100.0% 0.1 0.1 3
4 0.7% 42.9% 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.3 4
5 1.8% 5.7% 0.1 0.1 1.7 0.1 5
6 10.5% 1.4% 0.1 0.1 10.4 0.2 6
7 20.4% 20.4 7
8 30.5% 30.5 8
9 31.7% 31.7 9
10 3.9% 3.9 10
11 0.4% 0.4 11
12 0.2% 0.2 12
13 0.1% 0.1 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
Total 100% 0.7% 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 99.4 0.1 0.6




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Furman 25.1% 1.0 0.3
Louisville 9.3% 1.0 0.1
Alabama 7.3% 1.0 0.1
Vanderbilt 6.1% 1.0 0.1
Rice 5.9% 1.0 0.1
Ohio State 3.8% 1.0 0.0
Texas 2.2% 1.0 0.0
Colorado St. 2.1% 1.0 0.0
Oklahoma 1.0% 1.0 0.0
Dartmouth 0.8% 1.0 0.0
Brown 0.6% 1.0 0.0
Elon 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Clemson 0.1% 2.0 0.0
Florida State 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.6
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 4.0