Purdue
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
83  Hope Schmelzle JR 19:58
147  Katie Hoevet SR 20:11
213  Kendall Hacker SO 20:22
349  Sharise Lund SR 20:41
355  Kiara McIntosh JR 20:41
525  Mary Abramson FR 20:57
647  Alyssa Christoffer SO 21:07
704  Grace Lachmund SO 21:13
903  Brooke Kline SR 21:27
950  Desarae Diedrich JR 21:31
1,388  Anna Dolce FR 22:02
1,699  Renee Studt FR 22:22
2,042  Reagan Lear FR 22:45
2,188  Sarah Tyler SO 22:57
2,444  Rachel Yuska FR 23:20
2,839  Taylor Smith SR 24:11
National Rank #29 of 339
Great Lakes Region Rank #4 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 66.7%
Most Likely Finish 26th at Nationals


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 1.2%
Top 20 at Nationals 16.6%


Regional Champion 0.7%
Top 5 in Regional 81.5%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Hope Schmelzle Katie Hoevet Kendall Hacker Sharise Lund Kiara McIntosh Mary Abramson Alyssa Christoffer Grace Lachmund Brooke Kline Desarae Diedrich Anna Dolce
Coast to Coast Battle in Beantown 09/25 722 20:16 20:21 20:20 20:41 20:39 20:55 21:48
Joe Piane Notre Dame Invitational (Blue) 10/02 651 19:55 19:57 20:34 20:28 20:53 20:54 21:24 21:43
D1 Pre-Nationals (Red) 10/17 744 20:06 20:42 20:11 20:56 20:38 20:52 21:25
Illini Open 10/23 1307 22:03
Big Ten Championships 11/01 701 19:46 20:02 20:42 20:44 20:57 21:10 21:15 21:33 21:16
Great Lakes Region Championships 11/13 637 19:52 20:03 20:19 20:38 21:19 20:50 21:23
NCAA Championship 11/21 20:02





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 66.7% 23.6 569 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.9 2.1 2.5 3.1 3.4 4.3 4.4 4.7 4.9 5.8 5.5 5.7 5.8 4.8 0.8
Region Championship 100% 4.5 150 0.7 3.7 12.7 37.0 27.4 11.6 4.2 2.0 0.6 0.1 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Hope Schmelzle 78.4% 79.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Katie Hoevet 69.9% 114.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Kendall Hacker 67.1% 148.2 0.0
Sharise Lund 66.7% 194.9
Kiara McIntosh 66.7% 194.2
Mary Abramson 66.7% 223.1
Alyssa Christoffer 66.7% 236.1


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Hope Schmelzle 10.9 0.7 1.8 3.6 5.4 6.5 6.9 6.9 6.5 6.3 6.1 5.8 5.1 5.2 3.9 3.8 3.5 2.9 2.7 2.5 1.9 1.6 1.6 1.0 1.2
Katie Hoevet 18.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.0 2.0 2.4 2.9 3.0 3.6 4.0 3.8 4.7 3.8 4.1 4.1 4.3 4.7 4.0 3.2 3.8 3.0 3.7 3.1 3.2
Kendall Hacker 27.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.8 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.4 2.4 2.8 2.9 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.5 3.3 3.4
Sharise Lund 44.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.9 1.1
Kiara McIntosh 44.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9
Mary Abramson 60.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Alyssa Christoffer 72.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 0.7% 100.0% 0.7 0.7 1
2 3.7% 100.0% 3.7 3.7 2
3 12.7% 97.3% 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.2 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.4 1.1 0.3 0.3 12.4 3
4 37.0% 82.9% 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.5 1.2 1.9 2.7 4.7 4.9 5.6 4.1 4.6 6.3 30.7 4
5 27.4% 65.4% 0.1 0.4 0.6 1.1 1.8 3.1 3.3 3.8 3.7 9.5 17.9 5
6 11.6% 9.5% 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 10.5 1.1 6
7 4.2% 5.7% 0.0 0.0 0.2 4.0 0.2 7
8 2.0% 2.0 8
9 0.6% 0.6 9
10 0.1% 0.1 10
11 0.0% 0.0 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
Total 100% 66.7% 0.7 3.7 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.8 1.7 2.8 4.0 5.3 8.0 9.8 10.5 9.3 9.3 33.3 4.3 62.3




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Texas 43.8% 1.0 0.4
Villanova 30.4% 1.0 0.3
Kansas 26.0% 1.0 0.3
SMU 21.4% 1.0 0.2
Yale 19.5% 1.0 0.2
Air Force 10.1% 1.0 0.1
Stephen F. Austin 9.1% 1.0 0.1
Colorado St. 8.8% 2.0 0.2
Arizona State 8.4% 1.0 0.1
Texas A&M 8.2% 1.0 0.1
Lipscomb 6.0% 1.0 0.1
Florida State 5.9% 1.0 0.1
Rice 5.9% 1.0 0.1
Indiana 5.9% 1.0 0.1
California 5.3% 1.0 0.1
Brown 5.0% 2.0 0.1
Harvard 3.0% 1.0 0.0
Dartmouth 2.9% 1.0 0.0
Oklahoma 2.3% 1.0 0.0
Penn 1.8% 1.0 0.0
Florida 1.7% 2.0 0.0
Boston College 1.4% 1.0 0.0
Cal Poly 1.4% 1.0 0.0
Cornell 1.3% 1.0 0.0
Eastern Washington 0.7% 1.0 0.0
Bradley 0.4% 2.0 0.0
Missouri 0.3% 2.0 0.0
San Francisco 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Eastern Michigan 0.2% 2.0 0.0
New Hampshire 0.2% 2.0 0.0
Ohio State 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Eastern Kentucky 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Connecticut 0.0% 2.0 0.0
Total 2.5
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 10.0