Duke
Men -
Women
2014
-
2015 -
2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
17 |
Shaun Thompson |
SR |
31:14 |
257 |
Blake Udland |
SR |
32:26 |
427 |
Stephen Shine |
SO |
32:49 |
477 |
Alec Kunzweiler |
SO |
32:56 |
489 |
Stephen Garrett |
FR |
32:58 |
579 |
Nikhil Pulimood |
FR |
33:07 |
585 |
Jordan Burton |
FR |
33:08 |
720 |
Daniel Moore |
JR |
33:22 |
1,003 |
William Hague |
SR |
33:47 |
1,881 |
Matt Luppino |
SO |
35:09 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.1% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
2.4% |
Top 10 in Regional |
99.0% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Shaun Thompson |
Blake Udland |
Stephen Shine |
Alec Kunzweiler |
Stephen Garrett |
Nikhil Pulimood |
Jordan Burton |
Daniel Moore |
William Hague |
Matt Luppino |
Princeton Inter Regional |
10/03 |
818 |
31:25 |
32:49 |
33:05 |
32:43 |
33:00 |
33:19 |
33:05 |
32:44 |
|
35:17 |
Royals Challenge |
10/09 |
1262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34:15 |
|
D1 Pre-Nationals (Red) |
10/17 |
757 |
31:20 |
32:19 |
32:42 |
32:43 |
33:16 |
32:49 |
|
33:35 |
|
|
ACC Championships |
10/30 |
774 |
31:08 |
32:11 |
32:55 |
33:55 |
32:49 |
33:22 |
33:28 |
33:09 |
33:34 |
35:04 |
Southeast Region Championships |
11/13 |
765 |
30:49 |
32:36 |
32:37 |
|
32:47 |
33:03 |
32:56 |
34:31 |
|
|
NCAA Championship |
11/21 |
|
31:47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
3.2% |
26.7 |
612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
0.4 |
0.1 |
Region Championship |
100% |
7.7 |
217 |
|
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.5 |
1.7 |
6.5 |
32.1 |
39.7 |
15.7 |
2.7 |
0.8 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Shaun Thompson |
98.6% |
23.4 |
|
0.1 |
0.8 |
1.6 |
2.2 |
2.6 |
2.9 |
2.9 |
2.7 |
2.8 |
2.6 |
2.4 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.6 |
2.3 |
2.2 |
2.8 |
2.0 |
2.3 |
1.7 |
2.1 |
1.6 |
1.9 |
1.3 |
Blake Udland |
3.8% |
141.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Shine |
3.2% |
187.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alec Kunzweiler |
3.2% |
206.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Garrett |
3.2% |
205.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nikhil Pulimood |
3.2% |
217.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jordan Burton |
3.2% |
219.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Shaun Thompson |
3.7 |
12.3 |
17.5 |
13.4 |
9.9 |
6.9 |
5.7 |
4.9 |
4.3 |
3.1 |
3.7 |
2.7 |
2.3 |
2.0 |
1.7 |
1.4 |
1.5 |
0.9 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
Blake Udland |
35.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
2.0 |
2.2 |
2.5 |
2.7 |
Stephen Shine |
54.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Alec Kunzweiler |
60.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
Stephen Garrett |
62.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Nikhil Pulimood |
71.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jordan Burton |
71.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
2 |
3 |
0.2% |
90.0% |
| |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
0.2 |
3 |
4 |
0.5% |
52.0% |
| |
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
|
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
0.3 |
4 |
5 |
1.7% |
47.1% |
| |
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
0.9 |
|
0.8 |
5 |
6 |
6.5% |
29.6% |
| |
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
4.6 |
|
1.9 |
6 |
7 |
32.1% |
0.1% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
32.1 |
|
0.0 |
7 |
8 |
39.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39.7 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
15.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
2.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
0.8% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
0.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
0.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
Total |
100% |
3.2% |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
96.8 |
0.0 |
3.2 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.