Duke
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
336  Madison Granger SR 20:39
360  Anima Banks SR 20:42
441  Sheridan Wilbur FR 20:50
615  Olivia Anderson SR 21:05
843  Liz Lansing FR 21:23
997  Gabrielle Richichi FR 21:34
1,090  Kim Hallowes FR 21:41
1,622  Allison Sturges SR 22:18
National Rank #94 of 339
Southeast Region Rank #12 of 49
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.2%
Most Likely Finish 7th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 9.9%
Top 10 in Regional 78.3%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Madison Granger Anima Banks Sheridan Wilbur Olivia Anderson Liz Lansing Gabrielle Richichi Kim Hallowes Allison Sturges
Princeton Inter Regional 10/03 1005 20:21 20:54 20:50 21:33 21:43 21:55 21:17 22:05
D1 Pre-Nationals (Red) 10/17 947 20:36 20:36 20:41 21:11 20:56 21:25 21:29
ACC Championships 10/30 1024 20:45 20:28 20:55 21:29 21:32 22:30
Southeast Region Championships 11/13 1081 21:03 20:57 21:05 20:46 21:33 23:33





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.2% 29.7 755 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
Region Championship 100% 8.5 301 0.2 1.1 8.6 14.7 16.5 15.9 11.4 9.9 7.4 5.2 4.0 2.5 1.2 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Madison Granger 0.2% 152.0
Anima Banks 0.2% 170.5
Sheridan Wilbur 0.2% 189.5
Olivia Anderson 0.2% 215.0
Liz Lansing 0.2% 240.0
Gabrielle Richichi 0.2% 239.5
Kim Hallowes 0.2% 246.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Madison Granger 41.7 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.3 1.3 1.0
Anima Banks 43.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.0 1.1
Sheridan Wilbur 52.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.4
Olivia Anderson 68.5 0.0 0.0
Liz Lansing 91.8
Gabrielle Richichi 108.7
Kim Hallowes 121.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 0.2% 25.0% 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 3
4 1.1% 14.3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.0 0.2 4
5 8.6% 8.6 5
6 14.7% 14.7 6
7 16.5% 16.5 7
8 15.9% 15.9 8
9 11.4% 11.4 9
10 9.9% 9.9 10
11 7.4% 7.4 11
12 5.2% 5.2 12
13 4.0% 4.0 13
14 2.5% 2.5 14
15 1.2% 1.2 15
16 0.8% 0.8 16
17 0.3% 0.3 17
18 0.1% 0.1 18
19 0.0% 0.0 19
20 0.0% 0.0 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
Total 100% 0.2% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 99.8 0.0 0.2




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Texas 43.8% 1.0 0.4
Stephen F. Austin 9.1% 1.0 0.1
Rice 5.9% 1.0 0.1
Oklahoma 2.3% 1.0 0.0
Florida 1.7% 1.0 0.0
Missouri 0.3% 1.0 0.0
Connecticut 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.6
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 3.0