Kansas
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
14  Sharon Lokedi SO 19:31
191  Hannah Richardson SR 20:17
263  Malika Baker SR 20:28
542  Lydia Saggau JR 21:00
643  Nashia Baker SR 21:08
661  Hannah Dimmick JR 21:09
885  Jennifer Angles SR 21:24
923  Courtney Coppinger SR 21:27
1,107  Riley Cooney SO 21:39
1,422  Rachel Simon SR 21:58
1,802  Emmie Skopec SO 22:21
1,974  Kayla Funkenbusch SO 22:31
National Rank #41 of 344
Midwest Region Rank #5 of 37
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 7.9%
Most Likely Finish 5th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.2%
Top 20 at Nationals 2.0%


Regional Champion 0.9%
Top 5 in Regional 58.5%
Top 10 in Regional 99.8%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Sharon Lokedi Hannah Richardson Malika Baker Lydia Saggau Nashia Baker Hannah Dimmick Jennifer Angles Courtney Coppinger Riley Cooney Rachel Simon Emmie Skopec
Rim Rock Classic 10/01 804 19:48 20:54 20:28 21:24 20:48 20:56 21:04 22:06 21:11 21:55 22:15
ISU adidas Pre Nationals (Open) 10/15 1238 21:13 22:01 22:04 22:25
ISU adidas Pre Nationals (Blue) 10/15 693 19:33 20:10 20:24 21:26 21:01 20:58 21:20
Big 12 Championship 10/29 718 19:18 20:18 20:45 20:37 21:22 21:40 21:11 21:18 21:44 22:19
Midwest Region Championships 11/11 677 19:36 20:05 20:19 20:51 22:03 21:14 21:41





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 7.9% 23.3 549 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.1
Region Championship 100% 5.1 167 0.9 4.7 10.6 18.0 24.4 21.3 14.1 4.4 1.0 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Sharon Lokedi 98.1% 21.7 0.7 1.2 1.6 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.4 2.9 2.9 2.6 2.7 3.0 2.4 2.9 2.4 2.1 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.6 2.1 2.0 2.1 1.8 2.4
Hannah Richardson 13.0% 119.5
Malika Baker 8.5% 139.5
Lydia Saggau 7.9% 211.3
Nashia Baker 7.9% 224.3
Hannah Dimmick 7.9% 225.3
Jennifer Angles 7.9% 240.8


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Sharon Lokedi 1.4 32.0 40.8 13.3 5.8 2.7 1.8 1.7 0.7 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Hannah Richardson 15.8 0.1 1.2 2.0 2.0 2.8 1.9 3.3 4.6 4.5 4.3 3.9 5.4 4.5 5.8 4.7 4.6 4.2 4.5 3.9 3.4 3.2 3.4 2.1 2.4
Malika Baker 24.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.3 1.8 1.9 2.2 2.8 2.8 3.5 3.2 4.2 4.4 3.7 3.2 3.9 3.4 3.6 3.9
Lydia Saggau 57.9 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.3
Nashia Baker 70.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1
Hannah Dimmick 72.7 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Jennifer Angles 95.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 0.9% 100.0% 0.9 0.9 1
2 4.7% 100.0% 4.7 4.7 2
3 10.6% 19.0% 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.4 0.1 8.6 2.0 3
4 18.0% 1.7% 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 17.7 0.3 4
5 24.4% 24.4 5
6 21.3% 21.3 6
7 14.1% 14.1 7
8 4.4% 4.4 8
9 1.0% 1.0 9
10 0.7% 0.7 10
11 0.1% 0.1 11
12 12
13 0.1% 0.1 13
14 0.1% 0.1 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
Total 100% 7.9% 0.9 4.7 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.4 0.1 92.2 5.6 2.3




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Florida 27.8% 1.0 0.3
Furman 25.1% 1.0 0.3
Virginia 24.8% 1.0 0.2
Eastern Kentucky 12.1% 1.0 0.1
Louisville 9.3% 1.0 0.1
Rice 5.9% 1.0 0.1
Ohio State 3.8% 1.0 0.0
Texas 2.2% 1.0 0.0
Colorado St. 2.1% 1.0 0.0
Butler 1.7% 1.0 0.0
Oklahoma 1.0% 1.0 0.0
Dartmouth 0.8% 1.0 0.0
Brown 0.6% 1.0 0.0
Indiana 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Elon 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Clemson 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Purdue 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 1.2
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 4.0