Syracuse
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
31  Margo Malone SR 19:38
101  Shaylyn Tuite SR 20:01
105  Sydney Leiher JR 20:02
278  Cassia Hameline SR 20:31
393  Maura Linde SR 20:44
412  Rebecca Skodis JR 20:47
495  Stephanie Bitcon SO 20:54
683  Karina Ernst JR 21:11
694  Alexandra Cooper FR 21:12
772  Mary Malone SO 21:17
924  Beth Wright SR 21:29
National Rank #18 of 339
Northeast Region Rank #2 of 43
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 96.9%
Most Likely Finish 18th at Nationals


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 1.4%
Top 10 at Nationals 10.6%
Top 20 at Nationals 63.0%


Regional Champion 7.9%
Top 5 in Regional 98.2%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Margo Malone Shaylyn Tuite Sydney Leiher Cassia Hameline Maura Linde Rebecca Skodis Stephanie Bitcon Karina Ernst Alexandra Cooper Mary Malone Beth Wright
Coast to Coast Battle in Beantown 09/25 640 19:34 22:03 20:12 20:32 20:28 21:18 20:51 21:02 21:10
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/16 564 19:34 20:25 19:57 20:41 20:29 21:07 21:33
ACC Championships 10/30 618 19:35 20:24 20:07 20:54 22:09 20:48 20:35 20:50 21:22 21:43
Northeast Region Championships 11/13 520 19:50 20:02 20:06 20:15 20:42 21:08 21:41
NCAA Championship 11/21 457 19:47 19:48 19:53 20:22 20:33 20:56 21:19





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 96.9% 18.0 463 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.3 1.9 2.2 2.9 3.3 3.7 4.4 5.0 5.8 6.2 5.7 6.7 6.1 5.6 5.3 5.6 4.4 4.5 3.7 2.9 2.7 2.2 1.7 0.8 0.1
Region Championship 100% 2.3 100 7.9 67.4 14.9 5.5 2.4 1.1 0.6 0.2 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Margo Malone 98.7% 34.7 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.9 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.5 1.3 1.9 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.9 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.1 1.7
Shaylyn Tuite 97.0% 91.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2
Sydney Leiher 97.0% 93.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2
Cassia Hameline 96.9% 176.6
Maura Linde 96.9% 206.0
Rebecca Skodis 96.9% 209.7
Stephanie Bitcon 96.9% 222.1


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Margo Malone 3.7 14.5 14.1 13.0 11.8 9.3 8.7 6.7 5.1 4.1 3.8 2.5 1.8 1.4 1.0 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shaylyn Tuite 11.9 0.3 1.0 1.5 2.6 2.7 3.8 5.2 6.1 6.3 7.4 7.0 7.1 6.4 6.7 5.7 4.7 4.2 4.0 3.2 3.1 2.1 1.9 1.2 1.6 0.8
Sydney Leiher 12.1 0.2 0.8 1.5 2.3 3.0 4.0 5.2 5.8 6.2 6.3 6.9 7.1 7.0 6.2 5.6 5.2 4.3 3.6 3.4 3.2 2.3 2.2 1.5 1.2 1.1
Cassia Hameline 29.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.8 1.2 1.2 1.6 1.8 2.2 2.5 3.2 3.6 3.2 3.7 4.4 3.9
Maura Linde 42.7 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.7
Rebecca Skodis 45.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.7
Stephanie Bitcon 55.6 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 7.9% 100.0% 7.9 7.9 1
2 67.4% 100.0% 67.4 67.4 2
3 14.9% 100.0% 1.3 1.8 3.2 3.6 3.0 1.2 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 14.9 3
4 5.5% 99.6% 0.3 0.4 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 5.5 4
5 2.4% 45.5% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 1.3 1.1 5
6 1.1% 9.1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.1 6
7 0.6% 0.6 7
8 0.2% 0.2 8
9 0.0% 0.0 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
Total 100% 96.9% 7.9 67.4 1.3 2.1 3.6 4.7 4.1 2.2 1.3 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 3.1 75.3 21.7




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Notre Dame 99.1% 1.0 1.0
Princeton 95.5% 1.0 1.0
Michigan State 94.1% 1.0 0.9
Minnesota 93.0% 1.0 0.9
Vanderbilt 92.1% 1.0 0.9
Georgetown 83.8% 1.0 0.8
Purdue 53.2% 1.0 0.5
William and Mary 40.1% 1.0 0.4
North Carolina 39.3% 2.0 0.8
Columbia 26.3% 1.0 0.3
SMU 21.4% 1.0 0.2
Baylor 11.7% 1.0 0.1
West Virginia 10.3% 1.0 0.1
Wisconsin 8.6% 1.0 0.1
Arizona State 8.4% 1.0 0.1
Lipscomb 6.0% 1.0 0.1
Florida State 5.9% 3.0 0.2
Indiana 5.9% 1.0 0.1
Brown 5.0% 1.0 0.1
Tulsa 3.8% 1.0 0.0
Harvard 3.0% 2.0 0.1
Dartmouth 2.9% 2.0 0.1
Boston College 1.4% 3.0 0.0
Northern Arizona 1.3% 1.0 0.0
New Hampshire 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Ohio State 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Connecticut 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 8.7
Minimum 2.0
Maximum 20.0