Minnesota
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
101  Madeline Strandemo JR 20:02
109  Megan Hasz FR 20:04
125  Bethany Hasz FR 20:07
450  Bailey Ness SO 20:50
486  Abby Kargol FR 20:55
518  Emily Betz SO 20:58
570  Tamara Gorman SO 21:02
599  Patty O'Brien SO 21:05
619  Danielle Anderson JR 21:06
756  Molly Eastman SO 21:16
818  Courtney Alama SO 21:19
942  Tess Wasowicz JR 21:28
965  Elyse Prescott FR 21:29
1,033  Megan Flanagan JR 21:34
1,179  Emily Castanias SO 21:43
1,341  Sam Prouty FR 21:53
1,412  Haley Rasmussen FR 21:57
1,418  Carli Schulz SR 21:57
National Rank #30 of 344
Midwest Region Rank #3 of 37
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 40.9%
Most Likely Finish 3rd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.1%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.8%
Top 20 at Nationals 12.7%


Regional Champion 6.3%
Top 5 in Regional 90.1%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Madeline Strandemo Megan Hasz Bethany Hasz Bailey Ness Abby Kargol Emily Betz Tamara Gorman Patty O'Brien Danielle Anderson Molly Eastman Courtney Alama
Oz Memorial 09/09 705 20:17 20:22 20:27 20:24 21:03 20:51 21:01 20:40 21:01 21:08
Roy Griak Invitational 09/24 617 20:05 20:11 19:55 20:43 20:42 21:10 20:59 21:29 21:11
Joe Piane Invitational (Blue) 09/30 686 19:52 20:11 20:11 21:16 21:00 21:08 21:03 20:54 21:29
Nuttycombe Wisconsin Invitational (B Race) 10/14 1102 20:45 21:30 20:51 21:26
Nuttycombe Wisconsin Invitational 10/14 639 20:09 19:53 20:03 21:03 20:48 20:55 21:14
Big 10 Championship 10/30 514 19:35 19:48 20:04 20:40 20:39 20:50 21:03 21:15 21:29
Midwest Region Championships 11/11 659 19:59 20:03 20:08 20:55 21:31 20:55 21:27





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 40.9% 22.5 536 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.9 1.1 1.3 0.8 1.6 1.5 1.8 2.2 2.9 3.3 3.0 3.2 2.8 2.9 2.6 2.6 2.2 1.4 1.4
Region Championship 100% 3.5 121 6.3 20.4 30.2 21.5 11.8 6.6 2.8 0.6 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Madeline Strandemo 52.2% 84.8 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.1
Megan Hasz 48.6% 87.7 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Bethany Hasz 47.4% 97.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2
Bailey Ness 40.9% 211.5
Abby Kargol 40.9% 216.6
Emily Betz 40.9% 221.1
Tamara Gorman 40.9% 227.8


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Madeline Strandemo 8.0 0.7 3.4 7.5 8.6 8.2 8.0 6.8 6.7 6.1 5.9 5.8 4.6 4.1 3.8 3.8 3.1 2.2 1.9 1.5 0.9 1.3 1.2 0.7 0.6 0.6
Megan Hasz 9.0 0.4 1.5 5.2 7.3 8.0 7.4 7.2 7.1 6.0 5.9 6.0 5.3 4.6 4.7 3.8 3.5 2.9 1.7 2.3 1.8 1.3 1.5 1.1 0.9 0.4
Bethany Hasz 10.1 0.2 1.6 4.1 5.7 5.9 6.3 7.2 6.1 6.6 5.9 5.3 5.3 4.8 4.2 3.4 3.7 3.5 3.8 2.6 2.5 1.8 1.4 1.6 1.1 0.8
Bailey Ness 44.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.6 1.0 0.9 1.3 0.9
Abby Kargol 50.8 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.8
Emily Betz 54.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4
Tamara Gorman 61.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 6.3% 100.0% 6.3 6.3 1
2 20.4% 100.0% 20.4 20.4 2
3 30.2% 37.4% 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.8 3.3 18.9 11.3 3
4 21.5% 12.6% 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.2 1.0 18.8 2.7 4
5 11.8% 1.7% 0.1 0.2 11.6 0.2 5
6 6.6% 6.6 6
7 2.8% 2.8 7
8 0.6% 0.6 8
9 0.1% 0.1 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
Total 100% 40.9% 6.3 20.4 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.9 0.4 0.7 0.9 1.5 1.6 2.0 4.5 59.2 26.7 14.2




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Michigan State 96.5% 1.0 1.0
Boise State 60.0% 1.0 0.6
Furman 25.1% 1.0 0.3
Georgetown 22.0% 1.0 0.2
SMU 16.3% 1.0 0.2
Wisconsin 14.5% 2.0 0.3
Air Force 8.9% 1.0 0.1
Alabama 7.3% 1.0 0.1
Vanderbilt 6.1% 2.0 0.1
Ohio State 3.8% 1.0 0.0
Tulsa 3.4% 1.0 0.0
Duke 3.2% 1.0 0.0
Syracuse 2.3% 1.0 0.0
Texas 2.2% 1.0 0.0
Colorado St. 2.1% 1.0 0.0
Oklahoma 1.0% 1.0 0.0
Northern Illinois 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Clemson 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Florida State 0.1% 2.0 0.0
Wyoming 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Northern Arizona 0.1% 2.0 0.0
Purdue 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 3.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 8.0