Utah
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
57  Hannah McInturff SO 19:50
107  Sarah Feeny SO 20:02
255  Susannah Hurst SR 20:28
311  Andrea Chavez SR 20:36
339  Jessica Sams JR 20:40
371  Jocelyn Todd SR 20:42
510  Shaylen Crook SO 20:56
739  Giselle Slotboom JR 21:15
755  Sadie Wassum SO 21:16
829  Becky Sarmiento SO 21:22
845  Dana Snell JR 21:23
National Rank #27 of 339
Mountain Region Rank #4 of 20
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 70.2%
Most Likely Finish 25th at Nationals


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.2%
Top 10 at Nationals 2.4%
Top 20 at Nationals 28.8%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 69.6%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Hannah McInturff Sarah Feeny Susannah Hurst Andrea Chavez Jessica Sams Jocelyn Todd Shaylen Crook Giselle Slotboom Sadie Wassum Becky Sarmiento Dana Snell
Joe Piane Notre Dame Invitational (Blue) 10/02 578 19:50 19:44 20:33 20:27 20:47 20:48 20:37 21:24 21:42
D1 Pre-Nationals (Red) 10/17 606 19:37 19:40 20:34 20:49 20:39 20:56 21:51
Pac 12 Championships 10/30 656 19:56 20:09 20:32 20:33 20:38 20:40 20:47 21:17 21:23 21:11
Mountain Region Championships 11/13 543 19:44 20:10 20:08 20:47 20:15 20:53 21:07
NCAA Championship 11/21 744 20:05 20:31 20:32 20:34 21:09 20:44 21:15





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 70.2% 21.3 521 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.8 1.3 1.4 1.8 2.3 2.7 3.4 3.5 4.6 4.7 4.6 5.0 5.2 5.0 5.2 4.5 4.0 3.1 2.6 1.9 0.2
Region Championship 100% 4.8 152 0.6 22.6 26.3 20.1 15.3 10.1 4.5 0.5 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Hannah McInturff 87.7% 57.8 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7
Sarah Feeny 75.1% 87.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1
Susannah Hurst 70.2% 164.1
Andrea Chavez 70.2% 182.9
Jessica Sams 70.2% 192.0
Jocelyn Todd 70.2% 196.6
Shaylen Crook 70.2% 221.8


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Hannah McInturff 11.4 0.3 0.5 1.3 1.8 2.6 4.3 5.6 6.6 7.7 8.5 7.8 7.1 6.2 5.8 4.6 5.0 3.7 3.0 2.9 2.4 2.0 1.9 2.0 1.4 0.9
Sarah Feeny 17.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.7 0.7 1.4 2.0 2.6 3.8 4.8 4.9 5.2 4.9 5.8 5.2 5.0 5.2 4.4 4.3 3.8 4.0 3.1 3.4 3.1
Susannah Hurst 36.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.0 1.4 1.9 2.2 2.0
Andrea Chavez 42.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.9
Jessica Sams 45.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.5 0.6
Jocelyn Todd 47.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.5
Shaylen Crook 57.9 0.0 0.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 0.6% 100.0% 0.6 0.6 2
3 22.6% 96.6% 0.3 0.4 2.4 3.3 3.5 3.2 2.2 1.8 1.5 0.9 1.1 0.7 0.4 0.8 21.8 3
4 26.3% 91.6% 0.1 2.1 3.0 3.5 3.9 3.2 2.2 1.8 1.7 1.3 1.3 2.2 24.1 4
5 20.1% 76.4% 0.0 0.8 1.1 2.2 1.8 2.6 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.7 4.7 15.4 5
6 15.3% 44.5% 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.0 1.1 1.6 1.2 1.2 8.5 6.8 6
7 10.1% 13.3% 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.7 8.7 1.3 7
8 4.5% 2.6% 0.0 0.1 4.4 0.1 8
9 0.5% 0.5 9
10 10
11 0.0% 0.0 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
Total 100% 70.2% 0.6 0.3 0.4 2.4 5.4 7.4 7.9 8.5 7.3 7.4 5.8 6.5 5.0 5.3 29.8 0.6 69.6




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Georgetown 83.8% 1.0 0.8
Purdue 53.2% 2.0 1.1
Texas 43.8% 1.0 0.4
Weber State 40.5% 1.0 0.4
Villanova 30.4% 1.0 0.3
Kansas 26.0% 1.0 0.3
SMU 21.4% 1.0 0.2
Yale 19.5% 1.0 0.2
Air Force 10.1% 1.0 0.1
Stephen F. Austin 9.1% 1.0 0.1
Colorado St. 8.8% 2.0 0.2
Arizona State 8.4% 2.0 0.2
Texas A&M 8.2% 1.0 0.1
Rice 5.9% 1.0 0.1
California 5.3% 2.0 0.1
Brown 5.0% 1.0 0.1
Oklahoma 2.3% 1.0 0.0
Penn 1.8% 1.0 0.0
Florida 1.7% 2.0 0.0
Cal Poly 1.4% 1.0 0.0
Cornell 1.3% 1.0 0.0
Eastern Washington 0.7% 1.0 0.0
Bradley 0.4% 2.0 0.0
Missouri 0.3% 2.0 0.0
San Francisco 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Eastern Michigan 0.2% 2.0 0.0
New Hampshire 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Eastern Kentucky 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Connecticut 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 4.7
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 11.0