Purdue
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
91  Jaret Carpenter SO 31:44
148  Curt Eckstein FR 31:59
347  Jake Hanawalt JR 32:32
350  Jeremy Craven SR 32:33
405  Levi Taylor SO 32:39
471  Ben Anderson JR 32:45
491  Theo Burgwald SO 32:49
516  Bryan Hester SR 32:52
606  Matt Grider JR 33:02
National Rank #36 of 315
Great Lakes Region Rank #5 of 31
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 30.2%
Most Likely Finish 4th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 3.9%


Regional Champion 0.2%
Top 5 in Regional 71.8%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Jaret Carpenter Curt Eckstein Jake Hanawalt Jeremy Craven Levi Taylor Ben Anderson Theo Burgwald Bryan Hester Matt Grider
Indiana Intercollegiate Championship 09/15 539 31:31 31:46 33:26 31:56 32:20 33:02 32:51 32:15
Louisville Classic (Gold) 09/30 751 32:04 32:12 32:22 32:56 32:23 33:19 32:35 33:40
Nuttycombe Invitational 10/13 673 31:26 31:56 32:22 32:39 33:24 32:40 32:54
Illini Open 10/20 32:45
Big Ten Championship 10/29 696 31:32 32:00 32:29 32:50 32:39 32:35 33:04 33:06 33:46
Great Lakes Region Championships 11/10 706 31:44 31:59 32:43 32:26 32:38 32:33 32:48





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 30.2% 25.1 623 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.8 0.6 1.2 1.4 2.4 2.9 1.8 2.4 2.8 2.9 3.2 3.0 2.1 1.8
Region Championship 100% 4.7 142 0.2 3.1 21.6 24.6 22.4 16.9 8.4 2.4 0.5 0.2



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jaret Carpenter 66.7% 78.8 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3
Curt Eckstein 43.0% 109.9 0.1 0.1
Jake Hanawalt 30.2% 186.6
Jeremy Craven 30.2% 190.8
Levi Taylor 30.3% 201.6
Ben Anderson 30.2% 210.3
Theo Burgwald 30.5% 216.6


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jaret Carpenter 8.2 3.1 5.0 6.4 7.0 6.3 7.0 7.4 6.8 6.4 4.9 5.0 3.9 3.2 3.3 2.2 2.7 2.6 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.1 1.3 0.8 1.1 1.1
Curt Eckstein 15.0 0.2 0.3 1.0 1.8 2.4 2.8 3.6 4.8 4.9 4.9 4.6 4.6 4.9 5.3 4.1 4.3 3.4 3.6 3.0 2.9 2.4 2.3 1.9 2.1 2.2
Jake Hanawalt 37.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.7 0.5 0.9 0.6 1.4 1.1 1.9 2.0 2.6 1.7 2.4
Jeremy Craven 37.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.3 0.6 0.3 1.0 0.9 1.5 1.8 1.9 2.2 2.1 3.0
Levi Taylor 42.5 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.9 1.0 0.7 1.2 1.2 1.3
Ben Anderson 48.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 0.9 0.5
Theo Burgwald 52.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 0.2% 100.0% 0.2 0.2 1
2 3.1% 100.0% 3.1 3.1 2
3 21.6% 56.1% 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.7 1.0 0.9 1.9 1.7 1.5 0.8 3.2 9.5 12.1 3
4 24.6% 40.9% 0.5 0.7 1.4 1.2 2.0 1.8 1.1 1.6 14.5 10.1 4
5 22.4% 20.4% 0.2 0.5 0.6 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.9 17.8 4.6 5
6 16.9% 0.6% 0.1 0.1 16.8 0.1 6
7 8.4% 0.6% 0.1 8.4 0.1 7
8 2.4% 2.4 8
9 0.5% 0.5 9
10 0.2% 0.2 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
Total 100% 30.2% 0.2 3.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 1.2 1.8 2.8 3.7 4.8 4.1 2.4 5.6 69.9 3.3 26.9




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Minnesota 88.2% 1.0 0.9
Princeton 69.0% 1.0 0.7
Illinois 56.1% 1.0 0.6
Penn 37.5% 1.0 0.4
Boise State 37.1% 1.0 0.4
Penn State 26.3% 1.0 0.3
Wisconsin 26.1% 2.0 0.5
Florida State 23.7% 1.0 0.2
Tulsa 7.9% 1.0 0.1
Eastern Michigan 4.6% 1.0 0.0
Columbia 4.0% 1.0 0.0
Virginia 3.8% 1.0 0.0
Indiana 1.0% 2.0 0.0
California 0.4% 1.0 0.0
Kentucky 0.3% 2.0 0.0
Belmont 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Auburn 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Lipscomb 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Nebraska 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 4.1
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 9.0