Wisconsin
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
52  Joe Hardy SR 31:31
85  Oliver Hoare SO 31:43
221  Ben Eidenschink SO 32:13
400  Finn Gessner FR 32:39
410  Zack Snider SO 32:40
521  Tyson Miehe JR 32:52
660  Andrew Schilling SO 33:07
1,234  Zack Benning JR 33:58
1,336  Tannor Wagner FR 34:06
National Rank #27 of 315
Great Lakes Region Rank #3 of 31
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 32.3%
Most Likely Finish 3rd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.2%
Top 20 at Nationals 10.2%


Regional Champion 0.9%
Top 5 in Regional 80.6%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Joe Hardy Oliver Hoare Ben Eidenschink Finn Gessner Zack Snider Tyson Miehe Andrew Schilling Zack Benning Tannor Wagner
Louisville Classic (Gold) 09/30 690 31:39 31:16 34:10 32:45 33:14 33:00
Nuttycombe Invitational 10/13 759 31:20 32:21 32:04 32:58 33:46 34:56
Big Ten Championship 10/29 560 31:27 31:22 32:03 32:33 32:31 32:32 33:25 35:26
Great Lakes Region Championships 11/10 567 31:37 31:35 31:57 32:28 32:44 32:23 32:53





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 32.3% 22.7 566 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.2 0.6 1.8 2.0 2.5 2.8 2.2 2.7 2.7 2.1 2.4 2.2 2.2 1.6 0.8 0.6
Region Championship 100% 4.2 130 0.9 6.9 31.2 24.0 17.7 11.4 6.2 1.4 0.4 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Joe Hardy 85.7% 58.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.7 0.9 0.8 0.9 1.3 1.2 1.5 0.7
Oliver Hoare 69.6% 76.3 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3
Ben Eidenschink 33.9% 144.5
Finn Gessner 32.3% 202.3
Zack Snider 32.3% 204.3
Tyson Miehe 32.4% 224.4
Andrew Schilling 32.7% 235.9


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Joe Hardy 4.1 16.4 14.1 9.9 8.7 7.3 6.6 4.2 4.6 3.5 2.1 2.7 2.4 2.2 1.8 2.3 2.1 1.1 1.3 0.7 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.6 0.7 0.3
Oliver Hoare 7.6 3.1 5.8 7.6 7.4 8.5 7.2 7.4 6.0 5.6 4.1 3.6 3.7 3.5 2.6 3.5 2.1 2.3 1.6 1.9 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 0.7 0.6
Ben Eidenschink 22.6 0.2 0.2 0.4 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.9 2.6 2.9 3.2 3.8 2.7 3.3 4.1 4.1 3.8 3.9 3.3 4.0 3.5 2.8 2.7
Finn Gessner 44.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.9
Zack Snider 44.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.5 1.1 1.5 1.0
Tyson Miehe 55.7 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3
Andrew Schilling 72.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 0.9% 100.0% 0.9 0.9 1
2 6.9% 100.0% 6.9 6.9 2
3 31.2% 46.9% 0.6 0.1 0.6 1.2 1.3 2.0 2.2 1.9 1.6 0.9 2.5 16.6 14.6 3
4 24.0% 31.9% 0.1 0.3 0.8 1.4 1.9 1.6 0.8 1.0 16.3 7.7 4
5 17.7% 12.4% 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.7 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.4 15.5 2.2 5
6 11.4% 11.4 6
7 6.2% 6.2 7
8 1.4% 1.4 8
9 0.4% 0.4 9
10 0.1% 0.1 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
Total 100% 32.3% 0.9 6.9 0.6 0.1 0.6 1.3 1.7 2.9 4.2 3.9 3.7 2.0 3.8 67.8 7.8 24.5




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Minnesota 88.2% 1.0 0.9
Princeton 69.0% 1.0 0.7
Illinois 56.1% 2.0 1.1
Penn State 26.3% 1.0 0.3
Purdue 22.8% 1.0 0.2
Tulsa 7.9% 1.0 0.1
Columbia 4.0% 1.0 0.0
Virginia 3.8% 1.0 0.0
Indiana 1.0% 2.0 0.0
California 0.4% 1.0 0.0
Kentucky 0.3% 2.0 0.0
Belmont 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Auburn 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Lipscomb 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Nebraska 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 3.4
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 8.0