Baylor
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
29  Maggie Montoya SR 19:40
36  Lindsey Bradley FR 19:42
90  Peyton Thomas SR 20:00
123  Anna West FR 20:07
550  Gabrielle Satterlee FR 21:01
1,045  Kathryn Foreman FR 21:34
1,755  Madison Zimmerman JR 22:18
1,840  Hana Marsheck FR 22:24
2,039  Alison Andrews-Paul FR 22:35
National Rank #14 of 344
South Central Region Rank #2 of 36
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 99.2%
Most Likely Finish 11th at Nationals


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 2.2%
Top 10 at Nationals 20.6%
Top 20 at Nationals 80.9%


Regional Champion 20.3%
Top 5 in Regional 100.0%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Maggie Montoya Lindsey Bradley Peyton Thomas Anna West Gabrielle Satterlee Kathryn Foreman Madison Zimmerman Hana Marsheck Alison Andrews-Paul
North Texas Ken Garland Invitational 09/17 1306 22:01
Texas A&M Invitational 09/24 705 19:48 20:02 20:23 21:06 21:02
Joe Piane Invitational (Blue) 09/30 451 19:32 19:46 19:55 20:09 20:58 21:26 22:17
Aggieland Open 10/07 1392
Nuttycombe Wisconsin Invitational (B Race) 10/14 22:27 22:26 22:35
Nuttycombe Wisconsin Invitational 10/14 405 19:34 19:40 19:53 19:54 20:57 21:51
Big 12 Championship 10/29 661 19:44 19:42 20:11 21:08 22:03 22:24 22:25
South Central Region Championships 11/11 464 19:38 19:41 20:07 20:03 20:58 22:25 23:12





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 99.2% 15.4 418 0.1 0.4 0.5 1.2 1.6 3.2 3.8 4.3 5.6 6.8 6.2 5.8 5.9 6.4 6.3 6.5 6.1 4.9 5.5 3.9 3.6 2.3 2.8 1.8 1.1 1.2 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.1
Region Championship 100% 2.0 67 20.3 60.4 14.7 3.9 0.9



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Maggie Montoya 99.9% 39.5 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.1 1.5 1.7 1.4 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.7 1.5 1.4
Lindsey Bradley 99.6% 43.2 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.0 0.6 1.0 1.5 1.2 0.9 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.7 1.0 1.6 1.3 1.4 1.4
Peyton Thomas 99.2% 88.9 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.3
Anna West 99.2% 111.7 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2
Gabrielle Satterlee 99.2% 231.8
Kathryn Foreman 99.2% 249.0
Madison Zimmerman 99.2% 252.4


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Maggie Montoya 2.5 18.4 21.5 18.4 13.5 8.8 5.3 4.4 3.2 1.8 1.1 1.1 0.4 0.7 0.8 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Lindsey Bradley 2.8 14.2 19.5 19.3 13.6 9.1 7.4 5.3 3.1 2.4 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1
Peyton Thomas 8.2 0.4 2.2 3.9 7.9 9.8 8.5 8.8 7.4 8.7 6.6 7.4 4.6 4.7 3.9 3.3 2.8 2.3 2.1 1.6 1.3 0.9 0.7 0.4 0.1 0.2
Anna West 10.9 0.3 0.5 1.6 3.2 5.2 6.2 7.5 6.8 6.5 6.1 6.7 6.1 5.6 6.1 4.5 5.3 4.0 4.4 3.7 2.8 3.0 1.7 1.0 0.6 0.3
Gabrielle Satterlee 36.5 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.8 1.3 1.7 2.2
Kathryn Foreman 58.3
Madison Zimmerman 89.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 20.3% 100.0% 20.3 20.3 1
2 60.4% 100.0% 60.4 60.4 2
3 14.7% 100.0% 4.8 4.4 2.5 1.7 0.8 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 14.7 3
4 3.9% 100.0% 1.1 1.4 0.6 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.1 3.9 4
5 0.9% 0.9 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
Total 100% 99.2% 20.3 60.4 4.8 5.5 3.9 2.3 1.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.9 80.7 18.5




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Iowa State 99.0% 1.0 1.0
Michigan State 96.5% 1.0 1.0
Mississippi 95.3% 1.0 1.0
Notre Dame 92.0% 2.0 1.8
Yale 92.0% 1.0 0.9
San Francisco 89.3% 1.0 0.9
BYU 86.9% 1.0 0.9
Utah 84.5% 2.0 1.7
Harvard 74.3% 1.0 0.7
Penn 68.6% 1.0 0.7
Villanova 62.9% 1.0 0.6
Boise State 60.0% 1.0 0.6
UCLA 54.6% 1.0 0.5
Minnesota 31.9% 2.0 0.6
California 28.9% 1.0 0.3
Georgetown 22.0% 1.0 0.2
SMU 16.3% 1.0 0.2
Wisconsin 14.5% 1.0 0.1
Kentucky 11.3% 1.0 0.1
Air Force 8.9% 1.0 0.1
Alabama 7.3% 1.0 0.1
Vanderbilt 6.1% 2.0 0.1
Kansas 5.6% 1.0 0.1
Tulsa 3.4% 1.0 0.0
Syracuse 2.3% 1.0 0.0
Texas 2.2% 2.0 0.0
Florida State 0.1% 2.0 0.0
Clemson 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Northern Arizona 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Purdue 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 14.3
Minimum 8.0
Maximum 20.0