SE Louisiana
Southland
2019-20 - 2025-26 - 2026-27
Switch to All-time Team Page
All team stats adjusted for opponents. See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.

Predictive Rating -7.6 290
Results Rating -9.2 311
Consistency 0.13 59
Pace 64.5 286
Improvement +0.2 182

Overall 1st FGA Second Chance TOs Free
throws		 Shot Selection
Offense D 333 D- D+ C- C D+
Defense C- 199 C- D+ B F+ C+

Offense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 34% 300 C- 56% 219 -3.0 288
2 Pt. Jumpers 46% 83 D+ 35% 271 +1.0 122
Three Pointers 40% 198 F+ 28% 354 -3.7 308
Shot Selection/Accuracy D+ -0.9 296 D- -4.8 330
1st FG Attempt D- 0.91 338
Second Chance D+ 27.7% 255 D 0.93 316 D+ 0.26 298
Opponents' Steals C+ 9.2% 159
Other Turnovers D 8.6% 318
Turnovers C- 17.8% 252
Freethrows C+ 0.32 121 D- 68% 329 C 0.22 183
Total Offense D -6.6 333

Assists Blocks (Opponents')
Close Shots C- 47% 218 C- 11.8% 231
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots C 24% 182 C+ 4.5% 151
Three Pointers D- 76% 328 C 0.9% 206
Total D+ 50% 300 C 5.6% 193

Defense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 37% 241 D+ 61% 261 +0.1 183
2 Pt. Jumpers 22% 110 C 38% 168 +0.6 235
Three Pointers 41% 184 D+ 36% 285 +1.3 250
Shot Selection/Accuracy C+ -0.3 113 D+ +2.3 273
1st FG Attempt C- 1.06 244
Second Chance C- 31.3% 228 D 1.13 307 D+ 0.35 285
Turnovers from Steals B- 10.9% 81
Other Turnovers B+ 8.6% 45
Turnovers B 19.5% 42
Freethrows F+ 0.38 347 D 75% 325 F+ 0.28 356
Total Defense C- -1.0 199

Assists Blocks
Close Shots C- 50% 224 C 10.8% 175
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots C- 28% 246 C+ 6.1% 100
Three Pointers C- 85% 219 D- -0.1% 361
Total C- 58% 226 C- 5.3% 194

Miscellaneous
Offense Defense
Possession Length 18.0 248 17.7 250
Fast Break Points Per Possession 0.14 266 0.22 326
Consistency 0.09 9 0.14 279
Improvement +2.0 89 -1.7 276

NCAA Tournament Selection
At-Large Selection Status Out of Consideration
Projected Seeding Not in Tournament  

Prediction Ranges
Pessimistic
5th Percentile 		Expected
50th Percentile 		Optimistic
95th Percentile
Predictive Rating Rank 305 290 275
Results Rating Rank 321 315 278
Conference Record 5 - 17 5 - 17 7 - 15
Conference Finish 12 12 10
NCAA Tourney Seed None None None
NCAA Tourney Finish None None None

NowWin NextLose Next
#1 Overall Seed 0% 0% 0%
#1 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 2 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 4 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 6 Seed 0% 0% 0%
NCAA Tourney Bid 0% 0% 0%
At-Large Bid if not Auto Qualifier 0% 0% 0%
Average Seed n/a n/a n/a
.500 or above 0% 0% 0%
.500 or above in Conference 0% 0% 0%
Conference Champion 0% 0% 0%
Last Place in Conference 94% 82% 100%
First Four0% 0% 0%
First Round0% 0% 0%
Second Round0% 0% 0%
Sweet Sixteen0% 0% 0%
Elite Eight0% 0% 0%
Final Four0% 0% 0%
Championship Game0% 0% 0%
National Champion0% 0% 0%
Next Game: Nicholls St. (Away) - 30.4% chance of victory

Projected Record by Quadrant
QuadProjectedProjected Cumulative
Quad 1a0 - 00 - 0
Quad 1b0 - 20 - 2
Quad 20 - 60 - 8
Quad 31 - 61 - 14
Quad 46 - 98 - 22


Date Opponent Result/Prediction Lead Record Total Rating Offense Defense
Avg Time Overall Conf Total First
FGA		 2nd Chance TOs Total First
FGA		 2nd Chance TOs
 Mon, Nov 3 79 @Mississippi L 58 - 88 6% -12  32% 0 - 1 F -20 F+ -9 D F D+ F -12 F+ D+ B
 Fri, Nov 7 301 @Louisiana L 52 - 58 41% -9  0% 0 - 2 D -11 F -14 F D C- C+ +1 F A+ A-
 Mon, Nov 10 143 @Georgia Tech L 60 - 70 14% -0  53% 0 - 3 D+ -6 F -17 D- F F A+ +12 B+ F+ A+
 Sat, Nov 15 81 @Mississippi St. L 68 - 75 6% -5  21% 0 - 4 C+ +3 D -6 D- F+ C+ A +9 B C+ A+
 Wed, Nov 26 107 @UNC Wilmington L 57 - 70 9% +1  59% 0 - 5 D+ -6 F+ -8 D- D- B+ C+ +1 C+ B B-
 Fri, Nov 28 362 Gardner-Webb W 76 - 68 84% -2  36% 1 - 5 D -10 F -10 F F C- C +0 D+ F A+
 Sat, Nov 29 146 Navy W 69 - 65 21% +7  72% 2 - 5 B- +5 C+ +2 A+ C F B- +3 B+ C+ C
 Sun, Dec 7 269 Northwestern St. L 68 - 76 56% +3  70% 2 - 6 0 - 1 F+ -17 D- -7 F D C+ F -11 D F A+
 Sat, Dec 13 294 @Houston Christian W 74 - 71 OT 40% +3  77% 3 - 6 1 - 1 C- -2 D+ -4 F+ D C- B- +2 D+ D+ A
 Mon, Dec 15 308 East Texas A&M L 69 - 70 66% +1  44% 3 - 7 1 - 2 D- -13 D+ -4 D+ F A+ F+ -9 F B C+
 Fri, Dec 19 53 @LSU L 65 - 78 4% -12  1% 3 - 8 C +1 C+ +3 D A+ C+ D+ -4 F A+ D+
 Tue, Dec 30 270 @Incarnate Word L 70 - 79 34% -4  7% 3 - 9 1 - 3 D- -12 F -12 F F+ C- C -0 D+ F+ C+
 Sat, Jan 3 103 Stephen F. Austin L 63 - 73 20% -8  5% 3 - 10 1 - 4 D -9 D- -8 D- B- C- C -1 B- D+ A
 Mon, Jan 5 220 Lamar W 60 - 52 45% +9  90% 4 - 10 2 - 4 C +2 D- -6 C+ F A- A +9 A+ D- A-
 Sat, Jan 10 85 @McNeese St. L 61 - 73 6% -7  13% 4 - 11 2 - 5 C- -2 C- -2 D- A D- C -1 D- A- B
 Mon, Jan 12 193 New Orleans L 76 - 79 40% -1  29% 4 - 12 2 - 6 D+ -8 D+ -3 F C+ B D -5 B F A-
 Sat, Jan 17 198 @TX A&M Corpus Christi L 56 - 68 21% -14  0% 4 - 13 2 - 7 D -11 F -16 D- D- F B +5 D F+ A+
 Mon, Jan 19 144 @UT Rio Grande Valley L 65 - 68 14% -4  6% 4 - 14 2 - 8 C +1 D+ -4 C- F B- B +5 C+ B D
 Sat, Jan 24 253 Nicholls St. W 67 - 61 52% +2  46% 5 - 14 3 - 8 C- -2 F -13 F F F A +11 A+ B A-
 Tue, Jan 27 85 McNeese St. L 66 - 76 14% -8  8% 5 - 15 3 - 9 D+ -6 D+ -4 C- C- D C- -3 D- C+ A
 Sat, Jan 31 103 @Stephen F. Austin L 58 - 85 9% -21  0% 5 - 16 3 - 10 F -20 D+ -4 D- B F F -20 F F B
 Mon, Feb 2 220 @Lamar L 54 - 73 24% -8  1% 5 - 17 3 - 11 F -19 F -12 F C B F -11 D F F
 Sat, Feb 7 294 Houston Christian W 55 - 47 63% +6  97% 6 - 17 4 - 11 C- -3 F -13 D D F A+ +12 A+ A- A-
 Mon, Feb 9 270 Incarnate Word W 74 - 62 57% +12  90% 7 - 17 5 - 11 C+ +3 C+ +3 D+ B+ A- B- +2 A- C B
 Sat, Feb 14 269 @Northwestern St. L 66 - 69 34% +2  70% 7 - 18 5 - 12 D+ -6 C- -2 D A+ F D -5 D C D
 Mon, Feb 16 308 @East Texas A&M L 53 - 70 43% -12  7% 7 - 19 5 - 13 F -23 F -21 F F B C- -2 D- D- C-
 Sat, Feb 21 144 UT Rio Grande Valley L 75 - 96 29% -16  0% 7 - 20 5 - 14 F -23 B +6 C+ C A+ F -31 F F+ D+
 Mon, Feb 23 198 TX A&M Corpus Christi L 68 - 73 41% -6  2% 7 - 21 5 - 15 D -10 C- -1 B- C C F+ -9 F F A+
 Sat, Feb 28 253 @Nicholls St. L 67 - 73 30%
 Mon, Mar 2 193 @New Orleans L 68 - 77 20%
Totals 8 - 22 6 - 16 -8 D -7 C+ D- D+ C- -1 F+ D- C



Game Detail
Grades are adjusted for opponent strength in each category. Game stats are not adjusted for oppoent strength. See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.
Offense Defense
Tot Off First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows Tot Def First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot
2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot
Season Ratings D C- D+ F+ D- 34% 46% 40% D+ D- D+ D D+ C- C+ D- C C- D+ C D+ D+ 37% 22% 41% C+ C- C- D D+ B F+ D F+
0.99 56% 35% 28% -5 -1 0.91 28% 0.9 .26 18% .32 68% .22 1.10 61% 38% 36% +2 0 1.06 31% 1.1 .35 19% .38 75% .24
Nov
3		 Mississippi F+ B+ F F+ D- 30% 12% 58% A- D D+ F F D+ A+ F A- F D- F C- F+ 29% 29% 42% D F+ F A+ D+ B F F F
0.87 62% 0% 28% -9 +1 0.86 26% 0.6 .16 20% .47 60% .28 1.32 71% 57% 35% +10 -2 1.19 44% 0.8 .37 15% .53 83% .44
Nov
7		 Louisiana F D F F F 41% 8% 51% B F C- F D C- A+ F A+ C+ C- F D- F 22% 46% 32% A+ F A+ A+ A+ A- D+ A+ C+
0.89 53% 0% 21% -15 +2 0.76 31% 0.8 .26 19% .66 58% .38 1.00 56% 63% 38% +13 -5 1.20 16% 0.5 .08 21% .26 58% .15
Nov
10		 Georgia Tech F F C- D D 26% 31% 43% F+ D- D- F F F C- A C+ A+ B B+ C- B+ 36% 31% 33% B+ B+ B- F F+ A+ F D+ F
0.79 43% 35% 30% -7 -2 0.83 23% 0.4 .10 26% .27 80% .21 0.92 53% 31% 36% -3 -2 0.93 30% 1.6 .47 26% .46 73% .34
Nov
15		 Mississippi St. D B- C F D- 29% 33% 38% D+ D- D+ F F+ C+ B- A+ A- A F+ A- C B- 27% 31% 41% A B B D+ C+ A+ F C- F
0.92 59% 37% 18% -9 -2 0.79 23% 0.7 .16 14% .28 89% .25 1.02 71% 31% 33% +1 -2 1.00 28% 1.1 .31 22% .40 70% .28
Nov
26		 UNC Wilmington F+ A+ B F D- 21% 27% 52% D+ D- D- F+ D- B+ D F F C+ F D- A+ C+ 26% 28% 47% B+ C+ B- B- B B- F F+ F
0.91 91% 43% 15% -7 -2 0.85 21% 0.9 .18 11% .22 50% .11 1.12 82% 42% 20% -3 -2 0.93 31% 1.0 .31 16% .57 77% .44
Nov
28		 Gardner-Webb F A+ C F F 29% 22% 49% F+ F D- F F C- A+ B+ A+ C D+ A D+ D 38% 20% 43% B D+ C+ F F A+ F D F
1.06 79% 36% 21% -4 -1 0.92 31% 0.7 .22 15% .53 78% .41 0.95 60% 25% 35% -1 0 1.00 21% 1.8 .38 29% .49 72% .36
Nov
29		 Navy C+ A C+ A+ A+ 26% 42% 33% F A+ D A C F B+ B+ A B- D+ A+ A+ A- 43% 29% 29% C+ B+ A F C+ C F A- F
1.07 73% 39% 57% +15 -4 1.26 25% 1.2 .29 26% .31 80% .25 1.00 61% 25% 25% -6 -1 0.88 24% 1.3 .29 19% .53 68% .36
Dec
7		 Northwestern St. D- A+ F+ F F 35% 28% 37% F+ F D- B- D C+ A+ D+ A+ F F+ B F F+ 36% 38% 26% A- D F F F A+ F D F
1.03 80% 33% 13% -6 -1 0.88 26% 1.2 .32 17% .55 70% .38 1.15 64% 33% 40% +3 -2 1.03 41% 1.6 .67 23% .53 78% .41
Dec
13		 Houston Christian D+ D+ D C- F+ 39% 24% 37% D- F+ D+ D D C- A+ C- A+ B- C- A+ D+ C- 48% 12% 40% F D+ F+ B- D+ A D- B- D
1.05 58% 33% 33% -2 0 0.98 30% 1.0 .30 19% .44 72% .31 1.01 58% 17% 35% -2 +2 1.02 34% 0.8 .29 23% .33 67% .22
Dec
15		 East Texas A&M D+ D- C- A C- 39% 27% 33% F+ D+ F+ F F A+ C- A- C F+ A+ F F F 30% 26% 43% A F B B B C+ F F F
1.07 50% 36% 41% 0 -1 1.00 25% 0.8 .19 11% .30 76% .23 1.08 43% 50% 45% +6 -1 1.11 20% 0.8 .17 19% .32 82% .27
Dec
19		 LSU C+ C A F D 33% 22% 45% C- D C+ A+ A+ C+ C- A- C D+ F A F F 34% 17% 49% C+ F A+ A A+ D+ F A- F
1.06 56% 45% 23% -7 -1 0.88 30% 1.4 .42 15% .29 73% .21 1.27 79% 29% 45% +13 0 1.29 24% 1.0 .24 13% .50 70% .36
Dec
30		 Incarnate Word F D F F F 50% 16% 34% B- F C+ F F+ C- D A C- C B+ A+ F D+ 31% 22% 47% C D+ B+ F F+ C+ C D C-
0.96 54% 22% 21% -11 +1 0.82 34% 0.7 .24 17% .33 80% .26 1.09 47% 17% 46% +1 -1 1.02 26% 1.5 .39 17% .26 75% .20
Jan
3		 Stephen F. Austin D- B- F F+ D 30% 34% 36% F D- D- A+ B- C- F A+ D C A D C C+ 28% 32% 40% B+ B- F B+ D+ A F F F
0.95 60% 29% 28% -6 -2 0.86 23% 1.5 .34 18% .20 91% .18 1.10 43% 44% 35% -2 -2 0.94 42% 0.9 .37 18% .35 79% .27
Jan
5		 Lamar D- D+ F A- C 49% 11% 41% A C+ D- F F A- A+ F B+ A A A+ A+ A+ 27% 34% 39% C+ A+ F C D- A- F F F
1.01 56% 25% 40% +1 +2 1.08 25% 0.5 .13 13% .60 52% .31 0.88 42% 20% 24% -17 -3 0.64 42% 0.9 .39 20% .44 86% .38
Jan
10		 McNeese St. C- F F D- F 49% 3% 49% A+ D- C+ A+ A D- A+ F A+ C D+ A D- D 54% 14% 32% F D- F+ A+ A- B C+ C+ C+
0.97 47% 0% 29% -10 +3 0.89 37% 1.4 .50 27% .61 64% .39 1.16 63% 29% 38% +3 +2 1.12 41% 0.6 .25 16% .28 73% .21
Jan
12		 New Orleans D+ D F F F 27% 36% 38% F F B- C C+ B A+ F+ A+ D D- A+ B B 38% 27% 35% C+ B D- F F A- F D F
1.09 50% 31% 24% -10 -3 0.76 38% 1.0 .38 13% .64 67% .43 1.14 64% 20% 31% -4 -1 0.92 40% 1.5 .60 23% .73 79% .58
Jan
17		 TX A&M Corpus Christi F D- F B F 57% 19% 23% B D- F+ C D- F F F F B A+ F F C- 60% 12% 28% F D C- F F+ A+ F C F
0.80 52% 11% 36% -8 +2 0.89 21% 1.0 .21 27% .25 62% .16 0.97 38% 80% 42% -4 +3 1.00 30% 1.2 .37 26% .46 67% .31
Jan
19		 UT Rio Grande Valley D+ B+ F C+ C- 37% 22% 41% C C- F+ F F B- D+ D D B A- F B C+ 32% 18% 50% B- C+ B- A- B D F A F
0.99 67% 18% 35% -1 0 1.00 24% 0.6 .14 15% .32 67% .22 1.03 50% 63% 32% 0 0 1.02 26% 0.9 .23 15% .45 68% .31
Jan
24		 Nicholls St. F C- B- F F+ 33% 27% 40% F+ F B+ F F F A+ C- A+ A A+ F+ A+ A+ 33% 14% 53% C A+ C A+ B A- F F F
0.95 60% 42% 28% -2 -1 0.96 41% 0.5 .19 26% .55 76% .42 0.86 38% 43% 23% -15 0 0.73 25% 0.8 .20 20% .42 75% .32
Jan
27		 McNeese St. D+ B- F B+ C 22% 22% 57% D- C- F A+ C- D A+ B A+ C- F+ F A+ F+ 48% 23% 30% C D- A- D- C+ A F B- F
0.99 63% 13% 38% -1 -1 0.97 25% 1.4 .36 27% .74 78% .58 1.14 68% 56% 25% +5 0 1.13 29% 1.1 .32 18% .53 72% .39
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows
Jan
31		 Stephen F. Austin D+ F+ F B D+ 33% 33% 35% F D- C A B F A- B- A- F F A+ F F 24% 22% 53% C+ F D- F F B C+ B B-
0.96 46% 31% 36% -5 -2 0.88 30% 1.3 .37 21% .36 76% .27 1.40 73% 20% 58% +19 -1 1.38 38% 1.8 .67 15% .21 64% .14
Feb
2		 Lamar F F B F+ F 41% 22% 37% C F F A+ C B F+ F F F D C+ C- D 29% 31% 39% C- D F+ F F F B+ A+ A
0.89 42% 40% 29% -9 0 0.85 21% 1.6 .32 15% .31 25% .08 1.20 60% 38% 35% +1 -2 1.00 39% 1.1 .45 10% .18 50% .09
Feb
7		 Houston Christian F C+ A- D D+ 34% 27% 39% F D B- F D F F F F A+ B+ A+ A+ A+ 46% 23% 31% C- A+ F A+ A- A- F F+ F
0.97 64% 45% 31% +3 -1 1.05 37% 0.8 .30 28% .17 57% .10 0.83 50% 11% 25% -14 0 0.74 37% 0.5 .17 21% .36 75% .27
Feb
9		 Incarnate Word C+ D- A C C- 32% 26% 43% F D+ C+ A B+ A- F F F B- C- A+ C+ B+ 29% 33% 38% A A- D B+ C B D- F F
1.21 53% 50% 35% +2 -1 1.04 33% 1.4 .45 11% .30 63% .18 1.01 57% 19% 33% -7 -2 0.83 35% 0.8 .30 18% .32 94% .30
Feb
14		 Northwestern St. C- B A+ F C- 35% 38% 28% F D A+ B- A+ F B+ D- C+ D D- B- D- F+ 33% 35% 33% B+ D C+ D+ C D F+ F F
1.06 64% 53% 18% +1 -2 1.00 46% 1.2 .57 26% .39 67% .26 1.10 63% 35% 38% +2 -2 1.02 23% 1.2 .27 14% .37 85% .32
Feb
16		 East Texas A&M F F F F+ F 42% 13% 44% C+ F F D- F B C F D C- D+ F A- F+ 39% 22% 39% C+ D- B+ F D- C- F A+ F+
0.78 27% 14% 30% -19 +1 0.67 20% 1.0 .20 15% .31 61% .19 1.03 61% 60% 28% +2 0 1.07 19% 1.5 .29 18% .41 52% .22
Feb
21		 UT Rio Grande Valley B B- A+ F C 46% 21% 33% B- C+ A- D- C A+ A+ D- A+ F F C- F F 26% 17% 57% B F A F F+ D+ F F F
1.18 64% 50% 25% +1 +1 1.04 39% 0.7 .27 9% .61 66% .40 1.50 83% 38% 56% +25 0 1.51 21% 1.8 .37 16% .35 95% .33
Feb
23		 TX A&M Corpus Christi C- A+ A+ F B+ 27% 34% 39% F B- C+ D C C A+ F+ A- F+ B- F F F 54% 32% 15% B- F F F F A+ F+ F F
1.05 82% 50% 25% +5 -3 1.07 31% 0.9 .28 20% .52 67% .35 1.13 50% 54% 50% +4 0 1.10 38% 1.5 .58 25% .41 75% .31



Numbers in tables represent percent chance of outcome occurring.



Projected Southland Finish

0-22 1-21 2-20 3-19 4-18 5-17 6-16 7-15 8-14 9-13 10-12 11-11 12-10 13-9 14-8 15-7 16-6 17-5 18-4 19-3 20-2 21-1 22-0 Total
1st 1st
2nd 2nd
3rd 3rd
4th 4th
5th 5th
6th 6th
7th 7th
8th 8th
9th 3.5 3.5 9th
10th 10.7 3.0 13.7 10th
11th 20.6 0.1 20.7 11th
12th 55.8 6.3 0.0 62.1 12th
Total 55.8 37.6 6.6 Total



Southland Regular Season Championship

Record Champion Total Outright 2-Way 3-Way 4-Way 5-Way 6-Way 7-Way 8-Way
22-0
21-1
20-2
19-3
18-4
17-5
16-6
15-7
14-8
13-9
12-10
11-11
Total



NCAA Tournament Selection

Conf RecordRecord ChanceTourney
Bid		AutoAt-LargeAvg
Seed		 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 No Bid At-Large if not Auto
22-0
21-1
20-2
19-3
18-4
17-5
16-6
15-7
14-8
13-9
12-10
11-11
10-12
9-13
8-14
7-15 6.6% 6.6
6-16 37.6% 37.6
5-17 55.8% 55.8
4-18
3-19
2-20
1-21
0-22
Total 100% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 100.0 0.0%


Best / Worst Case Scenarios

ChanceTourney
Bid		Avg
Seed		 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Win Out 6.6%
Lose Out 55.8%