Eastbrook
Boys - Girls
2020 - 2021 - 2022
Switch to All-time Team Page

State Rank #109
New Haven Semi-State Rank #26
Marion Regional Rank #3
Marion Sectional Rank #3
Most Likely Finish -
State Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at State Finals 0.0%
Top 10 at State Finals 0.0%
Advance to State Finals 0.0%
Advance to Semi-State 100.0%
Advance to Regional 100.0%



All times are adjusted ratings, which are calculated based on time relative to other runners in race.
Team Adjusted Rating is the team rating with runners missing from that race added back in.
Cells with NEI means there was not enough info to calculate adjusted ranking for that race.
Runners with red highlighting have not run recently and are not in the tournament simulation.




Season Rating Clinton Prairie Invitational Taylor University County Clash Taylor University Invitational Maconaquah Invitational New Haven Invitational Central Indiana Conference Marion Sectional Marion Regional New Haven Semi-State
Date 8/15 8/21 8/28 9/11 9/25 10/2 10/9 10/16 10/23
Team Rating 961 980 1,077 1,261 1,013 1,156 987 1,060
Team Adjusted Rating 968 1,013 1,099 1,013 965 944 1,031
State RankRunnerSeason Rating Clinton Prairie Invitational Taylor University County Clash Taylor University Invitational Maconaquah Invitational New Haven Invitational Central Indiana Conference Marion Sectional Marion Regional New Haven Semi-State
250  olivia Howell 10 20:33 21:32 21:21 21:31 21:59 21:15 21:17 21:11 21:05 20:22
788  claire Lakanen 10 22:16 22:16 22:12 21:58 22:34 22:24 21:48 22:18 22:27 22:19
849  Lauren Felver 12 22:23 23:07 22:42 23:07 22:30 22:19 21:53 22:25 22:25
1,141  Ellie Hallis 10 22:59 21:24 22:58 23:26
Whitney Gall 9 23:36 23:27 23:34 23:43
Josie Goble 10 23:40 23:49 24:07 24:18 23:27 23:56 23:28 23:09 24:11 25:39
Lydia Falder 9 28:16 26:26 28:45 27:17 28:21 29:41
Kathryn Nash 9 28:21 27:22 28:19 28:28 28:52




IHSAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 10,000 simulations of the IHSAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.






Team Results

Advances to RoundAvg FinishAvg Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
State Finals 0.0%
Semi-State 100% 18.0 476 0.0 0.5 2.5 8.6 22.4 30.6 21.9 13.5
Regionals 100% 4.2 115 0.8 30.6 34.0 22.5 10.4 1.7 0.1
Sectionals 100% 2.6 65 0.0 37.9 62.0 0.1



Individual Results



Indv No Team: Chance of running in round if team did not advance.
Indv: Chance of being in position to advance to round regardless of whether the team advanced.



State MeetAdvances to RoundAvg Finish Finishing Place Indv No TeamIndv
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
olivia Howell 1.3% 133.0 1.3% 1.3%


Semi-StateAdvances to RoundAvg Finish Finishing Place Indv No TeamIndv
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
olivia Howell 100% 52.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 100.0%
claire Lakanen 100% 132.8 58.7%
Lauren Felver 100% 138.0 42.6%
Ellie Hallis 100% 154.3 2.3%


RegionalsAdvances to RoundAvg Finish Finishing Place Indv No TeamIndv
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
olivia Howell 100% 4.3 0.1 21.4 23.2 20.9 17.6 12.6 3.2 0.8 0.3 0.0 0.0 100.0%
claire Lakanen 100% 22.4 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.7 1.2 1.9 2.9 3.6 4.4 5.4 5.7 6.3 7.2 7.1 7.5 7.6 7.1 100.0%
Lauren Felver 100% 25.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.9 1.9 2.5 2.8 3.4 4.5 5.4 5.7 6.9 7.1 7.1 100.0%
Ellie Hallis 100% 35.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 100.0%


SectionalsAvg Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
olivia Howell 2.4 33.0 38.4 28.5 0.2
claire Lakanen 10.1 1.9 6.2 8.7 10.0 10.2 12.2 11.8 10.8 10.3 8.3 5.7 2.9 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.0
Lauren Felver 11.8 0.6 2.4 4.1 6.0 8.0 9.4 10.5 11.7 13.5 13.1 10.5 7.2 2.4 0.6 0.2 0.0
Ellie Hallis 17.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.8 1.5 3.2 6.8 14.0 24.1 22.1 15.4 9.0 1.6 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.1