Bluffton
Boys - Girls
2020 - 2021 - 2022
Switch to All-time Team Page

State Rank #131
New Haven Semi-State Rank #38
Marion Regional Rank #7
Bellmont Sectional Rank #7
Most Likely Finish 7th place at Regionals
State Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at State Finals 0.0%
Top 10 at State Finals 0.0%
Advance to State Finals 0.0%
Advance to Semi-State 100.0%
Advance to Regional 100.0%



All times are adjusted ratings, which are calculated based on time relative to other runners in race.
Team Adjusted Rating is the team rating with runners missing from that race added back in.
Cells with NEI means there was not enough info to calculate adjusted ranking for that race.




Season Rating Norwell Bob Dahl Invitational Oak Hill Invitational Manchester Invitational Wildcat Classic South Adams Invitational New Haven Invitational Allen County Athletic Conference Bellmont Sectional Marion Regional
Date 8/15 8/28 9/4 9/11 9/18 9/25 10/2 10/9 10/16
Team Rating 1,005 1,139 1,195 1,266 1,080 1,083 1,031 985 893
Team Adjusted Rating 1,151 1,139 1,057 1,104 997 1,083 1,031 985 893
State RankRunnerSeason Rating Norwell Bob Dahl Invitational Oak Hill Invitational Manchester Invitational Wildcat Classic South Adams Invitational New Haven Invitational Allen County Athletic Conference Bellmont Sectional Marion Regional
586  Tyler Godwin 10 17:50 18:14 17:38 17:50 17:55 17:47 17:38
965  Sam Baumgartner 11 18:24 19:03 18:44 18:45 18:47 18:49 18:46 18:32 18:19 18:06
1,016  Jude Baumgartner 9 18:28 18:40 18:41 18:45 18:25 18:11 18:53 18:21 18:12 18:15
1,306  Markis Crosbie 12 18:50 19:11 19:36 18:30 19:08 18:44 19:10 19:11 18:31
Levi Johns 9 19:05 19:52 19:03 19:27 19:41 19:04 19:24 18:59 18:54 18:45
Bryson Mayer 12 19:47 19:43 19:57 19:34 20:18 19:53 19:38 19:42 19:37 20:16
Andrew Brown 12 20:08 19:46 20:18 19:58 19:52 19:53 20:23 20:13 20:25 20:52
Brett Kuhlenbeck 9 20:44 20:25 21:30 20:49 20:19 20:28 20:54 20:50




IHSAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the IHSAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.






Team Results

Advances to RoundAvg FinishAvg Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
State Finals 0.0%
Semi-State 100% 19.8 563 0.1 14.9 85.0
Regionals 100% 6.9 170 0.5 7.0 21.6 50.8 14.5 5.5
Sectionals 100% 3.8 115 0.0 7.8 22.7 55.9 13.3 0.3 0.0



Individual Results



Indv No Team: Chance of running in round if team did not advance.
Indv: Chance of being in position to advance to round regardless of whether the team made it.




Semi-StateAdvances to RoundAvg Finish Finishing Place Indv No TeamIndv
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Tyler Godwin 100% 124.4 76.7%
Sam Baumgartner 100% 151.6 2.2%
Jude Baumgartner 100% 153.4 0.8%
Markis Crosbie 100% 162.6 0.0%


RegionalsAdvances to RoundAvg Finish Finishing Place Indv No TeamIndv
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Tyler Godwin 100% 18.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.7 1.9 3.1 3.6 4.9 5.6 5.6 5.7 5.7 5.3 6.0 6.8 6.0 5.7 4.9 4.6 4.6 3.7 100.0%
Sam Baumgartner 100% 38.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.7 0.7 92.4%
Jude Baumgartner 100% 41.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 87.9%
Markis Crosbie 100% 54.9 38.3%


SectionalsAvg Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Tyler Godwin 8.3 0.2 5.2 6.8 7.9 8.5 8.7 9.5 10.2 8.6 7.8 7.1 6.8 5.1 3.5 1.9 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0
Sam Baumgartner 19.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.5 2.4 3.5 6.0 7.6 9.5 10.9 10.6 10.1 8.5 7.9 6.1 4.1
Jude Baumgartner 21.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.5 1.0 1.9 3.6 5.2 6.5 8.6 10.0 10.3 9.8 8.7 7.7 7.1
Markis Crosbie 29.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.9 1.8 2.7 3.6 4.8