Belmont
Missouri Valley
2024-25 - 2025-26 - 2026-27
Switch to All-time Team Page
Predictive Rating +8.3 68
Expected Predictive Rating +10.5 56
Pace 72.1 85
Improvement +0.4 173

Overall 1st FGA Second Chance TOs Free
throws		 Shot Selection
Offense B+ 49 A B- D+ C- B+
Defense C+ 136 B- C- C+ C+ B-

Offense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 42% 81 A- 67% 28 +5.8 18
2 Pt. Jumpers 20% 342 C 39% 148 -3.6 342
Three Pointers 47% 63 A 41% 4 +8.0 12
Shot Selection/Accuracy B+ +1.5 21 A +8.2 7
1st FG Attempt A 1.22 2
Second Chance C- 28.0% 248 A 1.26 7 B- 0.35 92
Turnovers D+ 18.3% 278
Freethrows C 0.31 174 D 69% 293 C- 0.21 205
Total Offense B+ +7.0 49

Assists Blocks (Opponents')
Close Shots B- 55% 67 B 8.8% 71
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots B- 32% 94 D+ 6.6% 276
Three Pointers B- 88% 98 D- 1.8% 340
Total B+ 66% 25 C+ 5.3% 144

Defense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 29% 355 B 54% 72 -7.0 13
2 Pt. Jumpers 19% 238 A- 32% 12 -1.9 43
Three Pointers 53% 4 C 34% 205 +6.4 356
Shot Selection/Accuracy B- -0.4 98 B- -2.0 99
1st FG Attempt B- 0.97 100
Second Chance C- 32.1% 251 C+ 1.01 150 C- 0.32 221
Turnovers C+ 18.0% 113
Freethrows B- 0.28 90 D- 75% 330 C+ 0.21 134
Total Defense C+ +1.2 136

Assists Blocks
Close Shots B- 44% 88 B- 13.2% 86
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots B+ 16% 16 B+ 8.4% 36
Three Pointers C 84% 166 C 0.8% 169
Total C- 58% 238 C 5.8% 159

Miscellaneous
Offense Defense
Possession Length 15.7 37 18.2 310
Fast Break Points Per Possession 0.13 282 0.14 82
Improvement +3.6 #30 -3.2 #325

See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.
NowWin NextLose Next
#1 Overall Seed 0% 0% 0%
#1 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 2 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 4 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 6 Seed 0% 0% 0%
NCAA Tourney Bid 36% 36% 33%
At-Large Bid if not Auto Qualifier 4% 4% 2%
Average Seed 11.4 11.4 11.6
.500 or above 100% 100% 100%
.500 or above in Conference 100% 100% 100%
Conference Champion 100% 100% 100%
Last Place in Conference 0% 0% 0%
First Four2% 2% 1%
First Round34% 34% 32%
Second Round6% 6% 5%
Sweet Sixteen1% 1% 1%
Elite Eight0% 0% 0%
Final Four0% 0% 0%
Championship Game0% 0% 0%
National Champion0% 0% 0%

Next Game: Indiana St. (Home) - 90.9% chance of victory

Projected Seeding 12 seed  

Projected Record by Quad
QuadProjectedProjected Cumulative
Quad 1a0 - 00 - 0
Quad 1b0 - 00 - 0
Quad 26 - 26 - 2
Quad 311 - 318 - 5
Quad 49 - 127 - 5


Date Opponent Result/Prediction Lead Record Total Rating Offense Defense
Avg Time Overall Conf Total First
FGA		 2nd Chance TOs Total First
FGA		 2nd Chance TOs
 Mon, Nov 3 347 Air Force W 79 - 63 98% +4  63% 1 - 0 C -0 C+ +2 C+ F B+ C -1 F D- A+
 Sat, Nov 8 247 Tennessee St. W 87 - 79 92% +6  97% 2 - 0 C +0 D -6 C+ F D B +5 A- C+ C
 Sat, Nov 15 338 @Oral Roberts W 83 - 60 93% +6  65% 3 - 0 B+ +14 C- -2 A- A F A+ +15 A+ B D+
 Wed, Nov 19 190 Lipscomb W 75 - 68 89% +7  89% 4 - 0 C+ +2 F+ -10 D+ B F A+ +11 A+ F A+
 Mon, Nov 24 355 St. Francis (PA) W 94 - 57 97% +16  94% 5 - 0 A +22 B+ +8 A D+ C A+ +14 A+ B A
 Wed, Nov 26 169 Toledo W 87 - 72 80% +3  63% 6 - 0 B+ +14 B +7 A+ A+ F A- +7 B C C+
 Sun, Nov 30 151 @College of Charleston W 96 - 73 69% +19  96% 7 - 0 A+ +26 A+ +23 A+ D+ A+ B- +3 A+ D- F
 Wed, Dec 3 129 Richmond L 76 - 84 81% +0  42% 7 - 1 D -9 D -5 C+ B- F+ D+ -4 F A+ B-
 Sun, Dec 7 171 @Middle Tennessee W 83 - 62 72% +8  82% 8 - 1 A+ +23 B+ +8 A C+ A- A+ +15 A+ D+ F
 Sat, Dec 13 106 Illinois-Chicago W 87 - 84 75% -3  26% 9 - 1 1 - 0 C+ +4 A+ +23 A+ B D+ F -18 F+ D+ F
 Tue, Dec 16 298 @Evansville W 83 - 78 89% +7  99% 10 - 1 2 - 0 C +0 C +0 C F D+ C -0 C+ C+ D
 Fri, Dec 19 116 @UC Irvine W 84 - 58 59% +8  75% 11 - 1 A+ +32 A+ +17 A+ C+ F+ A+ +15 A+ A F
 Mon, Dec 29 211 @Indiana St. L 80 - 81 OT 78% +2  68% 11 - 2 2 - 1 C -1 C- -1 C C- F C+ +1 C- C- C
 Thu, Jan 1 120 Bradley W 88 - 78 79% +3  85% 12 - 2 3 - 1 B +10 A +13 A+ A F+ C- -3 D- D+ A+
 Sun, Jan 4 128 Southern Illinois L 67 - 68 80% -0  33% 12 - 3 3 - 2 C- -2 D+ -3 A+ D F C+ +1 C- C- A+
 Wed, Jan 7 90 @Northern Iowa W 78 - 65 46% +8  95% 13 - 3 4 - 2 A +22 A+ +27 A+ B+ A+ C- -2 B C- F
 Sat, Jan 10 194 @Drake W 78 - 76 76% -11  4% 14 - 3 5 - 2 C+ +3 C- -1 F A F B +4 F A A+
 Tue, Jan 13 161 Valparaiso W 78 - 74 86% +3  79% 15 - 3 6 - 2 C +1 B+ +8 A+ F A- D- -7 C+ F B-
 Sat, Jan 17 128 @Southern Illinois W 73 - 68 62% +2  58% 16 - 3 7 - 2 B +10 B +6 C- B A+ B +4 A- C+ C+
 Sat, Jan 24 99 Illinois St. W 80 - 69 72% +6  79% 17 - 3 8 - 2 B+ +13 B+ +7 A+ C- F+ B+ +6 A+ F A-
 Wed, Jan 28 161 @Valparaiso W 78 - 77 70% +2  60% 18 - 3 9 - 2 C+ +4 B +7 A+ A- F D+ -3 F+ A+ D
 Sat, Jan 31 124 Murray St. W 103 - 86 79% +20  96% 19 - 3 10 - 2 A- +17 A+ +24 A+ A+ A D- -7 A F B
 Tue, Feb 3 194 Drake W 103 - 90 89% +8  92% 20 - 3 11 - 2 B- +8 A+ +24 A+ A A+ F -16 F F B+
 Fri, Feb 6 106 @Illinois-Chicago W 68 - 62 55% +9  96% 21 - 3 12 - 2 B+ +13 B- +5 A+ F+ F A +8 C A+ C-
 Mon, Feb 9 120 @Bradley L 84 - 95 OT 59% -2  27% 21 - 4 12 - 3 D+ -5 C+ +3 C A+ D- D- -8 D- B- F+
 Thu, Feb 12 90 Northern Iowa W 91 - 86 69% +2  76% 22 - 4 13 - 3 B +8 A+ +20 A+ C+ B F -12 D+ C- C
 Sun, Feb 15 124 @Murray St. W 87 - 70 60% -3  33% 23 - 4 14 - 3 A +23 B+ +8 A C- D+ A+ +14 B+ A A-
 Sat, Feb 21 211 Indiana St. W 87 - 73 91%
 Wed, Feb 25 298 Evansville W 86 - 67 96%
 Sun, Mar 1 99 @Illinois St. W 77 - 76 50%
Totals 25 - 5 16 - 4 +8 B+ +7 B A B+ C+ +1 A D C-



Game Detail
Grades are adjusted for opponent strength in each category. Game stats are not adjusted for oppoent strength. See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.
Offense Defense
Tot Off First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows Tot Def First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot
2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot
Season Ratings B+ A- C A A 42% 20% 47% B+ A C- A B- D+ C D C- C+ B A- C B- 29% 19% 53% B- B- C- C+ C- C+ B- D- C+
1.19 67% 39% 41% +8 +1 1.22 28% 1.3 .35 18% .31 69% .21 1.07 54% 32% 34% -2 0 0.97 32% 1.0 .32 18% .28 75% .23
Nov
3		 Air Force C+ A F D- C- 48% 10% 42% A C+ D F F B+ A+ A+ A+ C F D- D F 33% 23% 44% A F F A D- A+ A F B
1.19 74% 20% 30% +3 +2 1.13 26% 0.8 .19 12% .43 84% .36 0.95 79% 40% 37% +9 -1 1.19 35% 0.9 .30 35% .21 78% .16
Nov
8		 Tennessee St. D A+ F F C- 57% 6% 37% A- C+ F+ F F D A+ F A B A A+ C- A 32% 30% 38% C+ A- D- A C+ C C- F D-
1.07 76% 0% 26% +4 +3 1.16 24% 0.9 .21 21% .51 67% .34 0.97 45% 21% 33% -10 -2 0.79 36% 0.8 .30 16% .29 85% .25
Nov
15		 Oral Roberts C- C+ D+ A+ A 45% 16% 39% C- A- C+ A+ A F C- F F A+ C+ F A+ A+ 33% 15% 52% C+ A+ B B- B D+ F D F
1.10 59% 38% 47% +8 +1 1.20 35% 1.5 .52 25% .30 47% .14 0.80 53% 50% 11% -18 0 0.67 23% 0.9 .20 17% .42 77% .32
Nov
19		 Lipscomb F+ C D D- D- 33% 7% 60% A D+ C A- B F A+ C+ A+ A+ A+ D- A+ A+ 27% 8% 64% B- A+ F D- F A+ A- F B-
0.96 60% 33% 30% -4 +1 0.98 31% 1.2 .37 28% .52 72% .38 0.87 31% 40% 24% -17 +1 0.69 36% 1.2 .42 24% .17 90% .15
Nov
24		 St. Francis (PA) B+ B D A+ A 42% 6% 53% B+ A F A+ D+ C F A- F A+ A+ F A+ A+ 33% 15% 52% D- A+ C A B A C- D D+
1.31 68% 33% 50% +17 +2 1.40 24% 1.5 .36 18% .24 79% .19 0.79 41% 50% 22% -13 0 0.77 27% 0.7 .20 24% .27 73% .20
Nov
26		 Toledo B B+ A A+ A+ 36% 4% 60% B A+ B A+ A+ F F D- F A- D+ B B+ B+ 33% 15% 53% D- B A+ F C C+ A- A- A
1.22 67% 50% 50% +18 +2 1.42 40% 1.6 .64 28% .06 67% .04 1.01 61% 38% 31% -1 0 1.00 17% 1.7 .29 17% .22 69% .15
Nov
30		 College of Charleston A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ 32% 20% 48% C+ A+ D+ D+ D+ A+ A- F C+ B- A+ A+ A A+ 13% 17% 69% B A+ D D- D- F F C+ F
1.36 83% 55% 48% +22 0 1.45 28% 0.9 .24 8% .29 58% .17 1.03 43% 22% 25% -14 -1 0.71 33% 1.2 .39 11% .48 73% .35
Dec
3		 Richmond D B+ F D- C- 38% 5% 56% A+ C+ D A+ B- F+ D F F D+ B B- F F 25% 33% 42% B+ F A+ C A+ B- C D+ C-
1.03 67% 0% 29% -3 +2 1.00 26% 1.6 .41 20% .26 47% .12 1.14 54% 35% 59% +14 -3 1.25 10% 1.0 .10 16% .32 80% .26
Dec
7		 Middle Tennessee B+ A A C+ A 46% 19% 35% C+ A C- A- C+ A- F F F A+ A+ C- A+ A+ 14% 27% 59% A+ A+ B F D+ F C F D+
1.18 69% 45% 35% +7 +1 1.18 24% 1.2 .30 11% .21 38% .08 0.88 38% 40% 18% -16 -3 0.64 26% 1.2 .30 11% .26 75% .19
Dec
13		 Illinois-Chicago A+ B+ A+ A+ A+ 40% 5% 56% A A+ A D+ B D+ A+ D+ A+ F D+ B F F 20% 24% 56% A F+ D- C+ D+ F A F C
1.36 65% 50% 54% +20 +2 1.47 44% 0.9 .40 22% .44 73% .32 1.32 60% 33% 43% +7 -2 1.12 42% 1.0 .42 13% .23 100% .23
Dec
16		 Evansville C D+ F A+ C- 50% 13% 37% A C F C- F D+ A+ C- A+ C A+ A- F+ B- 24% 19% 57% D C+ C- A- C+ D F F F
1.09 56% 14% 45% +2 +2 1.09 21% 1.0 .21 18% .40 72% .29 1.02 38% 30% 39% -2 -1 0.96 24% 0.9 .22 17% .38 83% .32
Dec
19		 UC Irvine A+ D+ A+ A+ A+ 49% 9% 43% A+ A+ D+ A C+ F+ B+ B+ A- A+ A+ A+ B- A+ 25% 27% 48% B+ A+ A A A F B- A B+
1.21 48% 75% 55% +12 +2 1.30 30% 1.1 .33 22% .31 76% .24 0.83 38% 21% 32% -11 -2 0.77 23% 0.8 .19 13% .28 59% .17
Dec
29		 Indiana St. C- F F A+ C- 46% 11% 44% A C D+ C+ C- F B- A+ A- C+ B+ A+ F D+ 39% 11% 50% B C- D- B C- C F A+ D
1.06 46% 17% 44% -1 +2 1.04 29% 1.0 .29 21% .28 82% .23 1.07 52% 17% 44% +3 +1 1.11 31% 0.9 .28 18% .42 50% .21
Jan
1		 Bradley A B F A+ A- 50% 2% 48% A+ A+ A+ B- A F+ A+ C+ A+ C- B+ C+ F F+ 24% 18% 58% C D- F A+ D+ A+ C A+ B
1.26 64% 0% 43% +8 +3 1.25 43% 1.1 .46 23% .56 73% .41 1.12 50% 33% 45% +7 -1 1.14 41% 0.8 .32 23% .32 65% .20
Jan
4		 Southern Illinois D+ A- A+ F+ A+ 61% 14% 25% A+ A+ C- D- D F A F C- C+ A- F+ D D+ 28% 32% 40% A- C- F A- C- A+ B+ A- B+
0.97 67% 67% 27% +7 +3 1.20 26% 0.9 .22 23% .37 50% .19 0.98 50% 50% 35% +2 -2 1.02 38% 0.8 .30 26% .25 62% .16
Jan
7		 Northern Iowa A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ 49% 9% 42% A A+ D+ A+ B+ A+ B- F D C- D- A+ B- B+ 29% 8% 63% C B C- C C- F A- C B+
1.33 73% 50% 47% +17 +2 1.40 22% 1.4 .30 10% .29 53% .15 1.11 67% 0% 31% -3 +1 0.98 22% 1.1 .24 5% .18 70% .13
Jan
10		 Drake C- D+ F F F 33% 11% 56% A- F A- B+ A F A+ A- A+ B B+ A+ F F 19% 13% 67% C F B- A+ A A+ B+ A- A-
1.07 56% 17% 27% -9 +1 0.85 39% 1.1 .41 19% .43 76% .32 1.04 50% 29% 46% +9 0 1.19 23% 0.8 .17 23% .25 64% .16
Jan
13		 Valparaiso B+ A+ C- A+ A+ 47% 17% 36% B A+ F D F A- F A+ F D- F B- B C- 12% 36% 52% A+ C+ D- F F B- A- A+ A+
1.20 76% 33% 42% +12 +1 1.28 20% 0.8 .16 14% .11 100% .11 1.14 83% 33% 31% -1 -4 0.92 37% 1.6 .58 17% .28 53% .15
Jan
17		 Southern Illinois B A+ F F D+ 40% 19% 40% C+ C- B B- B A+ A+ C A B A- A+ C A 36% 20% 44% D A- B- D+ C+ C+ D F F
1.05 71% 30% 19% -5 0 0.92 33% 1.1 .35 13% .38 70% .27 0.98 50% 20% 32% -8 0 0.86 26% 1.0 .26 17% .35 85% .30
Jan
24		 Illinois St. B+ A+ A A+ A+ 38% 31% 31% C- A+ F A+ C- F+ A F B- B+ B+ A+ A A+ 28% 19% 53% C+ A+ F D- F A- F+ F F
1.15 72% 47% 53% +17 -1 1.33 12% 2.0 .23 20% .38 62% .23 0.99 54% 22% 28% -9 -1 0.83 35% 1.2 .43 20% .36 85% .31
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows
Jan
28		 Valparaiso B B C- A+ A+ 33% 14% 53% B- A+ D A+ A- F A- F+ B- D+ F A F+ F 28% 28% 43% C F+ C+ A+ A+ D C F+ D+
1.14 64% 33% 48% +12 0 1.28 27% 1.4 .38 22% .38 65% .24 1.13 73% 27% 39% +4 -2 1.08 31% 0.6 .19 13% .35 76% .27
Jan
31		 Murray St. A+ B+ A+ A+ A+ 44% 24% 33% C+ A+ A+ A+ A+ A A+ D- A- D- F A+ A+ A 35% 20% 46% B- A F F F B F F F
1.46 63% 54% 44% +11 0 1.24 47% 1.5 .69 11% .40 68% .27 1.22 81% 22% 19% -5 0 0.91 47% 1.4 .68 18% .45 85% .38
Feb
3		 Drake A+ A+ C+ A+ A+ 34% 14% 53% B+ A+ D- A+ A A+ F+ F F F B+ F F F 31% 20% 49% C F F F F B+ B- D- C+
1.47 80% 38% 48% +19 +1 1.41 24% 1.8 .42 7% .23 53% .12 1.29 50% 50% 48% +10 0 1.22 36% 1.7 .61 17% .28 75% .21
Feb
6		 Illinois-Chicago B- A- F A+ A+ 21% 9% 70% C A+ D+ F F+ F B F D A C- F A+ C- 39% 27% 34% B C C+ A+ A+ C- D- B D+
1.07 67% 25% 43% +10 0 1.23 31% 0.8 .23 27% .35 56% .19 0.98 59% 58% 20% -1 -1 0.98 35% 0.5 .18 17% .36 68% .25
Feb
9		 Bradley C+ A+ F D- C- 25% 19% 57% B- C B+ A+ A+ D- A- B- A- D- A A+ F D- 29% 15% 56% D+ D- B- B- B- F+ D- D+ D-
1.09 85% 20% 30% 0 -1 1.00 37% 1.4 .53 22% .40 75% .30 1.23 47% 11% 48% +5 0 1.12 24% 1.0 .24 10% .37 77% .29
Feb
12		 Northern Iowa A+ A- A+ A+ A+ 38% 8% 55% B+ A+ F A+ C+ B B A+ A- F C- F D D 41% 16% 43% C D+ B- F C- C F F F
1.28 65% 100% 45% +16 +2 1.38 13% 2.0 .25 15% .30 83% .25 1.21 62% 50% 36% +5 +1 1.14 18% 1.4 .25 14% .39 96% .38
Feb
15		 Murray St. B+ B+ F A+ B+ 52% 8% 40% A+ A F A+ C- D+ B A+ A A+ C+ A+ C- B+ 24% 18% 58% B+ B+ C+ A+ A A- D+ A+ B-
1.19 63% 0% 43% +5 +3 1.17 21% 1.5 .32 18% .33 85% .28 0.96 58% 22% 34% -2 -1 0.96 32% 0.8 .27 20% .36 62% .22



Numbers in tables represent percent chance of outcome occurring.



Projected Missouri Valley Finish

0-20 1-19 2-18 3-17 4-16 5-15 6-14 7-13 8-12 9-11 10-10 11-9 12-8 13-7 14-6 15-5 16-4 17-3 18-2 19-1 20-0 Total
1st 0.2 6.6 48.9 44.4 100.0 1st
2nd 2nd
3rd 3rd
4th 4th
5th 5th
6th 6th
7th 7th
8th 8th
9th 9th
10th 10th
11th 11th
Total 0.2 6.6 48.9 44.4 Total



Missouri Valley Regular Season Championship

Record Champion Total Outright 2-Way 3-Way 4-Way 5-Way 6-Way 7-Way 8-Way
20-0
19-1
18-2
17-3 100.0% 44.4    44.4
16-4 100.0% 48.9    48.9
15-5 100.0% 6.6    6.6
14-6 100.0% 0.2    0.1 0.1
13-7
12-8
11-9
10-10
Total 100.0% 100.0 99.9 0.1



NCAA Tournament Selection

Conf RecordRecord ChanceTourney
Bid		AutoAt-LargeAvg
Seed		 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 No Bid At-Large if not Auto
20-0
19-1
18-2
17-3 44.4% 39.6% 35.7% 3.9% 11.2 0.0 0.5 12.6 4.5 0.0 26.8 6.1%
16-4 48.9% 32.9% 31.6% 1.3% 11.5 0.1 7.7 8.3 0.1 32.8 2.0%
15-5 6.6% 30.9% 30.7% 0.2% 11.7 0.6 1.4 0.0 4.5 0.2%
14-6 0.2% 0.0 0.0 0.1
13-7
12-8
11-9
10-10
9-11
8-12
7-13
6-14
5-15
4-16
3-17
2-18
1-19
0-20
Total 100% 35.8% 33.4% 2.4% 11.4 64.3 3.6%


Best / Worst Case Scenarios

ChanceTourney
Bid		Avg
Seed		 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Win Out 15.9% 100.0% 11.2 0.2 2.8 69.1 27.8 0.1
Win Out, Lose in Conf. Tourney Championship 7.2% 7.1% 11.0 0.1 6.7 0.3
Win Out, Lose in Conf. Tourney Semi-Final 11.6% 5.5% 11.1 5.1 0.4