Belmont
Missouri Valley
2024-25 - 2025-26 - 2026-27
Switch to All-time Team Page
All team stats adjusted for opponents. See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.

Predictive Rating +8.9 62
Results Rating +10.8 55
Consistency 0.15 148
Pace 72.1 88
Improvement +1.4 135

Overall 1st FGA Second Chance TOs Free
throws		 Shot Selection
Offense B+ 46 A C+ D+ C- B+
Defense C+ 127 B- C C+ C+ C+

Offense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 42% 93 B+ 66% 33 +5.4 23
2 Pt. Jumpers 20% 343 C+ 40% 107 -3.4 333
Three Pointers 47% 55 A+ 41% 1 +8.3 9
Shot Selection/Accuracy B+ +1.4 25 A +8.4 5
1st FG Attempt A 1.23 2
Second Chance D+ 27.8% 253 A 1.23 11 C+ 0.34 104
Opponents' Steals C- 9.9% 238
Other Turnovers D+ 8.0% 275
Turnovers D+ 17.9% 262
Freethrows C 0.30 187 D+ 69% 271 C- 0.21 209
Total Offense B+ +7.3 46

Assists Blocks (Opponents')
Close Shots B- 55% 69 B- 9.3% 87
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots C+ 29% 117 D+ 6.8% 293
Three Pointers B- 88% 89 F+ 1.8% 345
Total A- 66% 23 C 5.5% 173

Defense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 29% 353 B- 54% 78 -6.4 18
2 Pt. Jumpers 18% 246 A- 32% 13 -2.0 35
Three Pointers 52% 4 C 34% 185 +5.8 353
Shot Selection/Accuracy C+ -0.4 110 B- -2.2 88
1st FG Attempt B- 0.97 92
Second Chance C- 31.4% 232 C+ 1.01 153 C 0.32 209
Turnovers from Steals C- 8.6% 244
Other Turnovers A- 9.2% 16
Turnovers C+ 17.8% 118
Freethrows B- 0.27 76 D 75% 328 C+ 0.20 112
Total Defense C+ +1.6 127

Assists Blocks
Close Shots B 42% 60 B- 13.2% 88
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots B+ 15% 13 B 8.0% 46
Three Pointers C 84% 169 C 0.9% 157
Total C- 57% 206 C 5.8% 158

Miscellaneous
Offense Defense
Possession Length 15.7 37 18.2 311
Fast Break Points Per Possession 0.13 285 0.14 79
Consistency 0.14 312 0.13 204
Improvement +3.8 27 -2.4 303

NCAA Tournament Selection
At-Large Selection Status Longshot
Projected Seeding 12 seed  

Prediction Ranges
Pessimistic
5th Percentile 		Expected
50th Percentile 		Optimistic
95th Percentile
Predictive Rating Rank 74 65 55
Results Rating Rank 66 55 42
Conference Record 16 - 4 17 - 3 17 - 3
Conference Finish 1 1 1
NCAA Tourney Seed None None 11
NCAA Tourney Finish None None 2nd Round

NowWin NextLose Next
#1 Overall Seed 0% 0% 0%
#1 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 2 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 4 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 6 Seed 0% 0% 0%
NCAA Tourney Bid 43% 48% 38%
At-Large Bid if not Auto Qualifier 8% 12% 4%
Average Seed 11.2 11.1 11.4
.500 or above 100% 100% 100%
.500 or above in Conference 100% 100% 100%
Conference Champion 100% 100% 100%
Last Place in Conference 0% 0% 0%
First Four5% 7% 2%
First Round40% 44% 37%
Second Round9% 10% 8%
Sweet Sixteen1% 1% 1%
Elite Eight0% 0% 0%
Final Four0% 0% 0%
Championship Game0% 0% 0%
National Champion0% 0% 0%
Next Game: Illinois St. (Away) - 53.5% chance of victory

Projected Record by Quadrant
QuadProjectedProjected Cumulative
Quad 1a0 - 00 - 0
Quad 1b0 - 00 - 0
Quad 26 - 26 - 2
Quad 312 - 318 - 5
Quad 49 - 027 - 5


Date Opponent Result/Prediction Lead Record Total Rating Offense Defense
Avg Time Overall Conf Total First
FGA		 2nd Chance TOs Total First
FGA		 2nd Chance TOs
 Mon, Nov 3 350 Air Force W 79 - 63 98% +4  63% 1 - 0 C -1 C +1 C+ F B+ C -1 F D A+
 Sat, Nov 8 217 Tennessee St. W 87 - 79 91% +6  97% 2 - 0 C+ +2 D -5 C+ F D B+ +6 A C+ C
 Sat, Nov 15 325 @Oral Roberts W 83 - 60 93% +6  65% 3 - 0 A- +16 C- -1 A- A F A+ +15 A+ B D+
 Wed, Nov 19 197 Lipscomb W 75 - 68 90% +7  89% 4 - 0 C+ +2 F+ -10 D+ B F A +11 A+ F A+
 Mon, Nov 24 355 St. Francis (PA) W 94 - 57 98% +16  94% 5 - 0 A +22 B +7 A D+ C- A+ +14 A+ B A
 Wed, Nov 26 164 Toledo W 87 - 72 81% +3  63% 6 - 0 A- +15 B +7 A+ A+ F A- +7 B C B-
 Sun, Nov 30 147 @College of Charleston W 96 - 73 69% +19  96% 7 - 0 A+ +27 A+ +23 A+ D+ A+ B +4 A+ D- F
 Wed, Dec 3 130 Richmond L 76 - 84 82% +0  42% 7 - 1 D -9 D -5 C+ B F+ D+ -3 F A+ B-
 Sun, Dec 7 160 @Middle Tennessee W 83 - 62 72% +8  82% 8 - 1 A+ +24 B+ +8 A C+ A- A+ +15 A+ C- F
 Sat, Dec 13 106 Illinois-Chicago W 87 - 84 77% -3  26% 9 - 1 1 - 0 C+ +4 A+ +22 A+ B D+ F -18 F+ D+ F
 Tue, Dec 16 297 @Evansville W 83 - 78 90% +7  99% 10 - 1 2 - 0 C -0 C -0 C F+ D+ C -0 C+ C+ D+
 Fri, Dec 19 123 @UC Irvine W 84 - 58 62% +8  75% 11 - 1 A+ +32 A+ +17 A+ C+ F+ A+ +15 A+ A F
 Mon, Dec 29 213 @Indiana St. L 80 - 81 OT 80% +2  68% 11 - 2 2 - 1 C -1 C- -1 C+ C- F C -0 D+ C- C
 Thu, Jan 1 114 Bradley W 88 - 78 80% +3  85% 12 - 2 3 - 1 B +10 A +13 A+ A+ F+ C- -3 D- D+ A+
 Sun, Jan 4 124 Southern Illinois L 67 - 68 81% -0  33% 12 - 3 3 - 2 C -1 D+ -2 A+ D F+ C+ +1 C- C- A+
 Wed, Jan 7 95 @Northern Iowa W 78 - 65 50% +8  95% 13 - 3 4 - 2 A +22 A+ +26 A+ B+ A+ C- -2 B+ C F
 Sat, Jan 10 189 @Drake W 78 - 76 77% -11  4% 14 - 3 5 - 2 C+ +3 C- -1 F A F B +4 F A A+
 Tue, Jan 13 150 Valparaiso W 78 - 74 86% +3  79% 15 - 3 6 - 2 C +2 B+ +8 A+ F A- D -6 C+ F B-
 Sat, Jan 17 124 @Southern Illinois W 73 - 68 62% +2  58% 16 - 3 7 - 2 B +11 B +7 C- B A+ B +4 A- C+ C+
 Sat, Jan 24 98 Illinois St. W 80 - 69 75% +6  79% 17 - 3 8 - 2 B+ +13 B +7 A+ C- F+ B+ +6 A+ F B+
 Wed, Jan 28 150 @Valparaiso W 78 - 77 70% +2  60% 18 - 3 9 - 2 C+ +5 B +7 A+ B+ F C- -3 F+ A+ D
 Sat, Jan 31 121 Murray St. W 103 - 86 81% +20  96% 19 - 3 10 - 2 A- +17 A+ +24 A+ A+ A D- -7 A F B
 Tue, Feb 3 189 Drake W 103 - 90 90% +8  92% 20 - 3 11 - 2 B +8 A+ +24 A+ A A+ F -16 F F B
 Fri, Feb 6 106 @Illinois-Chicago W 68 - 62 57% +9  96% 21 - 3 12 - 2 B+ +13 B- +5 A+ F+ F A +9 C A+ C
 Mon, Feb 9 114 @Bradley L 84 - 95 OT 60% -2  27% 21 - 4 12 - 3 C- -5 C+ +3 C- A+ D- D- -7 D B F+
 Thu, Feb 12 95 Northern Iowa W 91 - 86 72% +2  76% 22 - 4 13 - 3 B- +8 A+ +20 A+ C+ B+ F -12 D+ C- C-
 Sun, Feb 15 121 @Murray St. W 87 - 70 62% -3  33% 23 - 4 14 - 3 A +23 B+ +8 A C- D+ A+ +14 B+ A A
 Sat, Feb 21 213 Indiana St. W 87 - 70 91% +10  93% 24 - 4 15 - 3 B +11 B +6 A F B B +5 B- B- C-
 Wed, Feb 25 297 Evansville W 98 - 64 96% +19  99% 25 - 4 16 - 3 A +23 A+ +22 A+ D- A- B- +2 C- C D+
 Sun, Mar 1 98 @Illinois St. W 77 - 76 54%
Totals 26 - 4 17 - 3 +9 B+ +7 A+ A B+ C+ +2 A+ D+ C-



Game Detail
Grades are adjusted for opponent strength in each category. Game stats are not adjusted for oppoent strength. See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.
Offense Defense
Tot Off First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows Tot Def First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot
2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot
Season Ratings B+ B+ C+ A+ A 42% 20% 47% B+ A D+ A C+ D+ C D+ C- C+ B- A- C B- 29% 18% 52% C+ B- C- C+ C C+ B- D C+
1.19 66% 40% 41% +8 +1 1.23 28% 1.2 .34 18% .30 69% .21 1.06 54% 32% 34% -2 0 0.97 31% 1.0 .32 18% .27 75% .23
Nov
3		 Air Force C A F F+ C- 48% 10% 42% A C+ D+ F F B+ A+ A+ A+ C F D- D F 33% 23% 44% A F F A D A+ A F B
1.19 74% 20% 30% +3 +2 1.13 26% 0.8 .19 12% .43 84% .36 0.95 79% 40% 37% +9 -1 1.19 35% 0.9 .30 35% .21 78% .16
Nov
8		 Tennessee St. D A+ F F C 57% 6% 37% A- C+ D- F F D A+ F+ A B+ A A+ C- A 32% 30% 38% B- A D A C+ C C- F D
1.07 76% 0% 26% +4 +3 1.16 24% 0.9 .21 21% .51 67% .34 0.97 45% 21% 33% -10 -2 0.79 36% 0.8 .30 16% .29 85% .25
Nov
15		 Oral Roberts C- C+ D+ A+ A 45% 16% 39% C- A- B- A+ A F C- F F A+ C+ F A+ A+ 33% 15% 52% C+ A+ B+ B- B D+ F D+ F
1.10 59% 38% 47% +8 +1 1.20 35% 1.5 .52 25% .30 47% .14 0.80 53% 50% 11% -18 0 0.67 23% 0.9 .20 17% .42 77% .32
Nov
19		 Lipscomb F+ C D D- D- 33% 7% 60% A- D+ C A- B F A+ B- A+ A A+ D- A+ A+ 27% 8% 64% B- A+ F F+ F A+ B+ F B-
0.96 60% 33% 30% -4 +1 0.98 31% 1.2 .37 28% .52 72% .38 0.87 31% 40% 24% -17 +1 0.69 36% 1.2 .42 24% .17 90% .15
Nov
24		 St. Francis (PA) B B- D A+ A 42% 6% 53% B A F A+ D+ C- F A- F A+ A+ F A+ A+ 33% 15% 52% D- A+ C A+ B A C- D D+
1.31 68% 33% 50% +17 +2 1.40 24% 1.5 .36 18% .24 79% .19 0.79 41% 50% 22% -13 0 0.77 27% 0.7 .20 24% .27 73% .20
Nov
26		 Toledo B B+ A+ A+ A+ 36% 4% 60% B A+ B+ A+ A+ F F D- F A- D+ B B+ B+ 33% 15% 53% D- B A+ F C B- B+ A- A-
1.22 67% 50% 50% +18 +2 1.42 40% 1.6 .64 28% .06 67% .04 1.01 61% 38% 31% -1 0 1.00 17% 1.7 .29 17% .22 69% .15
Nov
30		 College of Charleston A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ 32% 20% 48% C+ A+ D+ D D+ A+ A- F C+ B A+ A+ A A+ 13% 17% 69% B+ A+ D D D- F F C+ F
1.36 83% 55% 48% +22 0 1.45 28% 0.9 .24 8% .29 58% .17 1.03 43% 22% 25% -14 -1 0.71 33% 1.2 .39 11% .48 73% .35
Dec
3		 Richmond D B+ F D- C- 38% 5% 56% A+ C+ D A+ B F+ D F F D+ B+ B- F F 25% 33% 42% B+ F A+ C+ A+ B- C+ D C
1.03 67% 0% 29% -3 +2 1.00 26% 1.6 .41 20% .26 47% .12 1.14 54% 35% 59% +14 -3 1.25 10% 1.0 .10 16% .32 80% .26
Dec
7		 Middle Tennessee B+ A A- C+ A 46% 19% 35% C+ A C- B+ C+ A- F F F A+ A+ C- A+ A+ 14% 27% 59% A A+ B+ F C- F C F D+
1.18 69% 45% 35% +7 +1 1.18 24% 1.2 .30 11% .21 38% .08 0.88 38% 40% 18% -16 -3 0.64 26% 1.2 .30 11% .26 75% .19
Dec
13		 Illinois-Chicago A+ B+ A+ A+ A+ 40% 5% 56% A A+ A D+ B D+ A+ C- A+ F D+ B F F 20% 24% 56% A F+ F+ C+ D+ F A F C
1.36 65% 50% 54% +20 +2 1.47 44% 0.9 .40 22% .44 73% .32 1.32 60% 33% 43% +7 -2 1.12 42% 1.0 .42 13% .23 100% .23
Dec
16		 Evansville C D+ F A+ D+ 50% 13% 37% A C F C- F+ D+ A+ C- A+ C A+ A- F+ B- 24% 19% 57% D+ C+ D+ A C+ D+ F F F
1.09 56% 14% 45% +2 +2 1.09 21% 1.0 .21 18% .40 72% .29 1.02 38% 30% 39% -2 -1 0.96 24% 0.9 .22 17% .38 83% .32
Dec
19		 UC Irvine A+ D+ A+ A+ A+ 49% 9% 43% A+ A+ D+ A C+ F+ B+ B+ A- A+ A+ A+ B- A+ 25% 27% 48% B+ A+ A A A F C+ A+ B
1.21 48% 75% 55% +12 +2 1.30 30% 1.1 .33 22% .31 76% .24 0.83 38% 21% 32% -11 -2 0.77 23% 0.8 .19 13% .28 59% .17
Dec
29		 Indiana St. C- F F A+ C- 46% 11% 44% A C+ D+ C+ C- F B- A+ A- C A- A+ F D 39% 11% 50% B- D+ D- B+ C- C F A+ D
1.06 46% 17% 44% -1 +2 1.04 29% 1.0 .29 21% .28 82% .23 1.07 52% 17% 44% +3 +1 1.11 31% 0.9 .28 18% .42 50% .21
Jan
1		 Bradley A B F A+ A- 50% 2% 48% A+ A+ A+ B A+ F+ A+ C+ A+ C- A- C+ F F+ 24% 18% 58% C+ D- F A+ D+ A+ C A+ B
1.26 64% 0% 43% +8 +3 1.25 43% 1.1 .46 23% .56 73% .41 1.12 50% 33% 45% +7 -1 1.14 41% 0.8 .32 23% .32 65% .20
Jan
4		 Southern Illinois D+ A- A+ F+ A+ 61% 14% 25% A+ A+ D+ F+ D F+ A F C- C+ A- F D D+ 28% 32% 40% A- C- F A- C- A+ B A- B+
0.97 67% 67% 27% +7 +3 1.20 26% 0.9 .22 23% .37 50% .19 0.98 50% 50% 35% +2 -2 1.02 38% 0.8 .30 26% .25 62% .16
Jan
7		 Northern Iowa A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ 49% 9% 42% A A+ D+ A+ B+ A+ B- F D C- D- A+ B- B+ 29% 8% 63% C- B+ C C- C F A- C B+
1.33 73% 50% 47% +17 +2 1.40 22% 1.4 .30 10% .29 53% .15 1.11 67% 0% 31% -3 +1 0.98 22% 1.1 .24 5% .18 70% .13
Jan
10		 Drake C- D+ F F F 33% 11% 56% A- F A- B+ A F A+ A- A+ B B+ A+ F F 19% 13% 67% C F B A+ A A+ B+ A- A-
1.07 56% 17% 27% -9 +1 0.85 39% 1.1 .41 19% .43 76% .32 1.04 50% 29% 46% +9 0 1.19 23% 0.8 .17 23% .25 64% .16
Jan
13		 Valparaiso B+ A+ C- A+ A+ 47% 17% 36% B A+ F D F A- F A+ F D F B- B C 12% 36% 52% A+ C+ D- F F B- A- A+ A+
1.20 76% 33% 42% +12 +1 1.28 20% 0.8 .16 14% .11 100% .11 1.14 83% 33% 31% -1 -4 0.92 37% 1.6 .58 17% .28 53% .15
Jan
17		 Southern Illinois B A+ F+ F C- 40% 19% 40% B- C- B- B- B A+ A+ C A B A- A+ C A 36% 20% 44% D A- B D+ C+ C+ D- F F
1.05 71% 30% 19% -5 0 0.92 33% 1.1 .35 13% .38 70% .27 0.98 50% 20% 32% -8 0 0.86 26% 1.0 .26 17% .35 85% .30
Jan
24		 Illinois St. B A+ A A+ A+ 38% 31% 31% C- A+ F A+ C- F+ A F B- B+ B+ A+ A A+ 28% 19% 53% C+ A+ F D- F B+ F F F
1.15 72% 47% 53% +17 -1 1.33 12% 2.0 .23 20% .38 62% .23 0.99 54% 22% 28% -9 -1 0.83 35% 1.2 .43 20% .36 85% .31
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows
Jan
28		 Valparaiso B B- C- A+ A+ 33% 14% 53% C+ A+ D A+ B+ F A- D- B- C- F A F+ F+ 28% 28% 43% C F+ C+ A+ A+ D C F+ D+
1.14 64% 33% 48% +12 0 1.28 27% 1.4 .38 22% .38 65% .24 1.13 73% 27% 39% +4 -2 1.08 31% 0.6 .19 13% .35 76% .27
Jan
31		 Murray St. A+ B+ A+ A+ A+ 44% 24% 33% C A+ A+ A+ A+ A A+ D- A- D- F A+ A+ A 35% 20% 46% B- A F F F B F F F
1.46 63% 54% 44% +11 0 1.24 47% 1.5 .69 11% .40 68% .27 1.22 81% 22% 19% -5 0 0.91 47% 1.4 .68 18% .45 85% .38
Feb
3		 Drake A+ A+ C+ A+ A+ 34% 14% 53% B+ A+ D- A+ A A+ F+ F F F B+ F F F 31% 20% 49% C- F F F F B B- D- C+
1.47 80% 38% 48% +19 +1 1.41 24% 1.8 .42 7% .23 53% .12 1.29 50% 50% 48% +10 0 1.22 36% 1.7 .61 17% .28 75% .21
Feb
6		 Illinois-Chicago B- A- F A+ A+ 21% 9% 70% C A+ D+ F F+ F B F D A C- F A+ C 39% 27% 34% B C C A+ A+ C D B D+
1.07 67% 25% 43% +10 0 1.23 31% 0.8 .23 27% .35 56% .19 0.98 59% 58% 20% -1 -1 0.98 35% 0.5 .18 17% .36 68% .25
Feb
9		 Bradley C+ A+ F D- C- 25% 19% 57% B- C- B+ A+ A+ D- A- B- A- D- A A+ F D- 29% 15% 56% D+ D B B- B F+ D- D+ F+
1.09 85% 20% 30% 0 -1 1.00 37% 1.4 .53 22% .40 75% .30 1.23 47% 11% 48% +5 0 1.12 24% 1.0 .24 10% .37 77% .29
Feb
12		 Northern Iowa A+ A- A+ A+ A+ 38% 8% 55% A- A+ F A+ C+ B+ B A+ A F C- F D D 41% 16% 43% C D+ B F C- C- F F F
1.28 65% 100% 45% +16 +2 1.38 13% 2.0 .25 15% .30 83% .25 1.21 62% 50% 36% +5 +1 1.14 18% 1.4 .25 14% .39 96% .38
Feb
15		 Murray St. B+ B+ F A+ B+ 52% 8% 40% A+ A F A+ C- D+ B A+ A A+ C+ A+ C- B+ 24% 18% 58% B+ B+ C+ A+ A A D+ A+ B
1.19 63% 0% 43% +5 +3 1.17 21% 1.5 .32 18% .33 85% .28 0.96 58% 22% 34% -2 -1 0.96 32% 0.8 .27 20% .36 62% .22
Feb
21		 Indiana St. B A+ A+ D- A 34% 20% 46% C A F F F B C- A+ B- B D- A+ B+ B 43% 9% 48% C B- B+ D B- C- A+ F A-
1.19 71% 75% 29% +8 0 1.18 21% 0.4 .09 12% .23 87% .20 0.96 68% 0% 29% -3 +2 1.00 20% 1.1 .23 18% .13 88% .12
Feb
25		 Evansville A+ C F A+ A+ 31% 7% 62% A- A+ D+ F+ D- A- F B F B- F D- A+ C 36% 18% 46% F C- B F C D+ A A+ A+
1.45 59% 25% 62% +25 +1 1.55 28% 0.9 .24 13% .15 78% .12 0.95 78% 44% 22% 0 0 1.02 18% 1.3 .24 18% .18 60% .11



Numbers in tables represent percent chance of outcome occurring.



Projected Missouri Valley Finish

0-20 1-19 2-18 3-17 4-16 5-15 6-14 7-13 8-12 9-11 10-10 11-9 12-8 13-7 14-6 15-5 16-4 17-3 18-2 19-1 20-0 Total
1st 46.5 53.5 100.0 1st
2nd 2nd
3rd 3rd
4th 4th
5th 5th
6th 6th
7th 7th
8th 8th
9th 9th
10th 10th
11th 11th
Total 46.5 53.5 Total



Missouri Valley Regular Season Championship

Record Champion Total Outright 2-Way 3-Way 4-Way 5-Way 6-Way 7-Way 8-Way
20-0
19-1
18-2
17-3 100.0% 53.5    53.5
16-4 100.0% 46.5    46.5
15-5
14-6
13-7
12-8
11-9
10-10
Total 100.0% 100.0 100.0



NCAA Tournament Selection

Conf RecordRecord ChanceTourney
Bid		AutoAt-LargeAvg
Seed		 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 No Bid At-Large if not Auto
20-0
19-1
18-2
17-3 53.5% 47.6% 40.6% 7.0% 11.1 0.1 1.7 18.4 5.3 0.0 28.1 11.8%
16-4 46.5% 38.1% 35.8% 2.4% 11.4 0.0 0.2 10.3 7.2 0.1 28.7 3.7%
15-5
14-6
13-7
12-8
11-9
10-10
9-11
8-12
7-13
6-14
5-15
4-16
3-17
2-18
1-19
0-20
Total 100% 43.2% 38.4% 4.8% 11.2 56.8 7.8%


Best / Worst Case Scenarios

ChanceTourney
Bid		Avg
Seed		 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Win Out 21.8% 100.0% 11.2 0.3 6.9 69.7 23.0 0.0
Win Out, Lose in Conf. Tourney Championship 9.9% 13.5% 11.0 0.7 11.8 1.0
Win Out, Lose in Conf. Tourney Semi-Final 9.9% 10.9% 11.0 0.4 9.6 0.9
Lose Out 11.6% 2.3% 11.1 0.0 1.9 0.3