Central Connecticut St.
Northeast
2025-26 - 2026-27 - 2027-28
Switch to Preseason Page
Switch to All-time Team Page
All team stats adjusted for opponents. See methodology page for details.
RatingRank vs Preseason
INCC Stats Predictive Rating -10.3 330 61%
INCC Stats Results Rating -2.0 226 97%
Consistency 0.27 359
Pace 63.5 320
Improvement - -

Overall 1st FGA Second Chance TOs Free
throws
Shot Selection
Offense D- 341 D D C- D- F
Defense D+ 281 D D+ D- B- D

Offense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 31% 347 D+ 54% 258 -5.4 340
2 Pt. Jumpers 51% 34 C 35% 204 +3.6 29
Three Pointers 38% 269 D+ 31% 251 -2.9 284
Selection / Accuracy F -2.0 352 D+ -2.8 271
1st FG Attempt D 0.90 314
Second Chance D- 24.6% 336 C 1.00 190 D 0.24 300
Opponents' Steals F 13.0% 356
Other Turnovers A- 5.5% 12
Turnovers C- 18.5% 245
Freethrows D- 0.25 344 C- 68% 267 D- 0.17 345
Total Offense D- -7.1 341

Assists Opponents' Blocks
Close Shots C+ 53% 121 C 11.6% 194
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots D+ 16% 289 B- 3.9% 115
Three Pointers D+ 81% 283 D- 1.8% 327
Total D+ 51% 288 C+ 5.4% 152


Defense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 42% 73 D 62% 304 +4.6 322
2 Pt. Jumpers 15% 338 D- 43% 335 -0.9 122
Three Pointers 43% 158 C+ 32% 145 -0.1 192
Selection / Accuracy D +1.0 339 D+ +2.5 287
1st FG Attempt D 1.06 311
Second Chance D+ 33.6% 302 C 1.00 168 D+ 0.34 255
Turnovers from Steals D 7.9% 313
Other Turnovers D 6.9% 294
Turnovers D- 14.7% 333
Freethrows B 0.26 39 D+ 73% 299 B- 0.19 69
Total Defense D+ -3.2 281

Assists Blocks
Close Shots C+ 47% 129 D+ 8.9% 270
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots D 35% 303 C- 4.1% 218
Three Pointers C 86% 185 C+ 1.3% 85
Total C 57% 177 C- 4.9% 238

Miscellaneous
Offense Defense
Possession Length 18.9 342 17.0 205
Fast Break Points Per Possession 0.11 343 0.20 258
Consistency 0.12 302 0.19 362

NCAA Tournament Selection
At-Large Chances Negligible (0%)
Projected Seeding Not in Tournament  

Previous Game Day Change - Sunday, Nov 8
Projected Overall Record 10 - 19 → 11 - 17 ▲ 1
Predictive Rating Rank 344 → 330 ▲ 14
Results Rating Rank 273 → 226 ▲ 47
Projected Conference Record 7 - 9 → 7 - 9 –
Projected Conference Finish 6 → 5 ▲ 1
Conference Champion 5% → 9% ▲ 4%
At-Large Chance 0% → 0% –
Opening Round Bye 0% → 0% –
Projected Seed
At-Large Status Negligible → Negligible
W, 78 - 71 vs 291 Dartmouth

NowWin NextLose Next
#1 Overall Seed 0% 0% 0%
#1 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 2 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 4 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 6 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Opening Round Bye 0% 0% 0%
NCAA Tourney Bid 10% 12% 9%
At-Large Status Negligible Negligible Negligible
At-Large Bid 0% 0% 0%
Average Seed 16.0 16.0 16.0
.500 or above 21% 32% 15%
.500 or above in Conf 47% 52% 45%
Conference Champion 30% 11% 8%
Last Place in Conference 20% 18% 21%
Opening Round10% 12% 9%
First Round5% 5% 4%
Second Round0% 0% 0%
Sweet Sixteen0% 0% 0%
Elite Eight0% 0% 0%
Final Four0% 0% 0%
Championship Game0% 0% 0%
National Champion0% 0% 0%
Next Game: Sacred Heart (Away) - 32% chance of victory

Prediction Ranges
Pessimistic
5th Percentile
Expected
50th Percentile
Optimistic
95th Percentile
Overall Record 6 - 22 11 - 18 17 - 12
Predictive Rating Rank 363 336 268
Results Rating Rank 363 330 238
Conference Record 3 - 13 7 - 9 12 - 4
Conference Finish 9 5 1
NCAA Tourney Seed None None 16
NCAA Tourney Finish None None Opening Round

Wins-Avg Loss Future Record Wins Chance At-Large
Chance
Avg Seed At-Large
Selection Chances
Indiv. Cumul.
23 - 6 22 - 4 0% 100% 15 Auto Bid
22 - 7 21 - 5 0% 100% Negligible
21 - 8 20 - 6 0% 100% Negligible
20 - 9 19 - 7 1% 100% Negligible
19 - 10 18 - 8 1% 99% Negligible
18 - 11 17 - 9 2% 97% Negligible
17 - 12 16 - 10 3% 95% Negligible
16 - 13 15 - 11 5% 93% Negligible
15 - 14 14 - 12 6% 88% Negligible
14 - 15 13 - 13 8% 82% Negligible
13 - 16 12 - 14 9% 74% Negligible
12 - 17 11 - 15 10% 65% Negligible
11 - 18 10 - 16 11% 54% Negligible
10 - 19 9 - 17 11% 43% Negligible
9 - 19 8 - 17 10% 33% Negligible
8 - 20 7 - 18 8% 22% Negligible
7 - 21 6 - 19 6% 14% Negligible
6 - 22 5 - 20 4% 8% Negligible
5 - 23 4 - 21 2% 4% Negligible
4 - 24 3 - 22 1% 2% Negligible
3 - 25 2 - 23 0% 1% Negligible
2 - 26 1 - 24 0% 0% Negligible
1 - 27 0 - 25 0% 0% Negligible

Projected Record by Quadrant
QuadProjectedProjected Cumulative
Quad 1a0 - 00 - 0
Quad 1b0 - 10 - 1
Quad 20 - 10 - 3
Quad 31 - 21 - 5
Quad 411 - 1211 - 17


Stat Type Preseason Nov 8 Current
Predictive Rank 335 329 330
Results Rank 231 226
Projected Overall Record 10 - 18 11 - 17 11 - 17
Projected Conference Record 7 - 9 7 - 9 7 - 9
Conference Champion 7% 8% 9%
Conference Finish 6 5 5
NCAA Tournament Seed
Opening Round Bye 0% 0% 0%
At-Large Tourney Chance 0% 0% 0%
At Large Status Negligible Negligible Negligible



Game Schedule and Ratings

Date Opponent Result/Prediction Lead Record Total Rating Offense Defense
Avg Time Overall Conf Total First
FGA
2nd Chance TOs Total First
FGA
2nd Chance TOs
Mon, Nov 2 171 Temple L 56 - 68 14% -15  0% 0 - 1 D -10 F -17 D- F C- B+ +6 D- C C-
Thu, Nov 5 63 Syracuse L 49 - 102 3% -25  0% 0 - 2 F -40 F -18 F D B- F -24 F F D-
Sun, Nov 8 291 Dartmouth W 78 - 71 OT 29% -1  43% 1 - 2 C+ +3 C +0 B- A D- B- +2 C+ C D
Thu, Nov 12 298 Sacred Heart L 66 - 71 32%
Sun, Nov 15 206 Quinnipiac L 67 - 71 36%
Sat, Nov 28 294 Navy L 63 - 65 42%
Sun, Nov 29 266 Fairfield L 63 - 70 24%
Sun, Dec 6 253 Brown L 61 - 66 33%
Sun, Dec 13 347 Loyola Maryland L 66 - 68 42%
Tue, Dec 15 62 VCU L 58 - 81 2%
Sun, Dec 20 125 Fordham L 60 - 75 9%
Sat, Jan 2 324 Chicago St. L 63 - 67 34% ✓
Mon, Jan 4 340 Wagner W 65 - 61 58% ✓
Fri, Jan 8 326 Le Moyne L 67 - 70 35% ✓
Sun, Jan 10 308 Mercyhurst L 62 - 66 32% ✓
Thu, Jan 14 342 New Haven W 63 - 59 62% ✓
Wed, Jan 20 353 Stonehill L 64 - 65 41% ✓
Sat, Jan 23 334 Fairleigh Dickinson W 65 - 62 60% ✓
Thu, Jan 28 260 LIU Brooklyn L 65 - 67 43% ✓
Sat, Jan 30 342 New Haven L 60 - 62 40% ✓
Wed, Feb 3 334 Fairleigh Dickinson L 62 - 65 37% ✓
Sat, Feb 6 353 Stonehill W 68 - 62 62% ✓
Thu, Feb 11 326 Le Moyne W 70 - 67 58% ✓
Sat, Feb 13 308 Mercyhurst W 65 - 63 53% ✓
Sat, Feb 20 340 Wagner L 62 - 64 37% ✓
Wed, Feb 24 324 Chicago St. W 66 - 64 55% ✓
Sat, Feb 27 260 LIU Brooklyn L 62 - 70 25% ✓
Totals 11 - 17 7 - 9 -10 D- -7 C D+ F D+ -3 D+ C- D-
Stat History After Each Game

Date Opponent Result Stats Rank Projected Record Chances Predicted At-Large Status
Predictive Results Overall Conf Opening Bye Conf
Champ
NCAA
Seed
Conf
Finish
Preseason 335 10 - 18 7 - 9 0% 7% 6 Negligible 0%
Mon, Nov 2 171 Temple L 56 - 68 327 322 11 - 18 7 - 9 0% 9% 5 Negligible 0%
Thu, Nov 5 63 Syracuse L 49 - 102 345 293 10 - 19 7 - 9 0% 5% 6 Negligible 0%
Sun, Nov 8 291 Dartmouth W 78 - 71 OT 329 231 11 - 17 7 - 9 0% 8% 5 Negligible 0%
Current 330 226 11 - 17 7 - 9 0% 9% 5 Negligible 0%






NCAA Tournament Selection

Wins-Avg Loss Future Record Wins Chance Tourney
Bid
Auto At-Large Avg
Seed
At-Large
Selection Chances
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 No Bid
Indiv. Cumul.
23 - 6 22 - 4 0% 100% 100% 100% 15 Auto Bid 0
22 - 7 21 - 5 0% 100% 81% 81% 16 Negligible 0 0 0
21 - 8 20 - 6 0% 100% 75% 75% 16 Negligible 0 0
20 - 9 19 - 7 1% 100% 75% 75% 16 Negligible 1 0
19 - 10 18 - 8 1% 99% 63% 63% 16 Negligible 1 0
18 - 11 17 - 9 2% 97% 50% 50% 16 Negligible 1 1
17 - 12 16 - 10 3% 95% 39% 39% 16 Negligible 1 2
16 - 13 15 - 11 5% 93% 32% 32% 16 Negligible 2 3
15 - 14 14 - 12 6% 88% 23% 23% 16 Negligible 1 5
14 - 15 13 - 13 8% 82% 13% 13% 16 Negligible 1 7
13 - 16 12 - 14 9% 74% 10% 10% 16 Negligible 1 8
12 - 17 11 - 15 10% 65% 6% 6% 16 Negligible 1 9
11 - 18 10 - 16 11% 54% 3% 3% 16 Negligible 0 11
10 - 19 9 - 17 11% 43% 3% 3% 16 Negligible 0 10
9 - 19 8 - 17 10% 33% 1% 1% 16 Negligible 0 10
8 - 20 7 - 18 8% 22% 1% 1% 16 Negligible 0 8
7 - 21 6 - 19 6% 14% 0% 0% 16 Negligible 0 6
6 - 22 5 - 20 4% 8% Negligible 4
5 - 23 4 - 21 2% 4% Negligible 2
4 - 24 3 - 22 1% 2% Negligible 1
3 - 25 2 - 23 0% 1% Negligible 0
2 - 26 1 - 24 0% 0% Negligible 0
1 - 27 0 - 25 0% 0% Negligible 0
Total 100% 10% 10% 0% 16 Negligible 10 90


At-Large Selection Detail

Wins-Avg Loss Future Record Avg Conf Record Wins Chance At-Large Opening Bye Avg
Seed
At-Large
Selection Chances
Average Rating Rank Average Quad Records
Indiv. Cumul. Predictive Results NET Quad 1 Quad 2 Quad 3 Quad 4
23 - 6 22 - 4 13 - 3 0% 100% Auto Bid 232 146 181 0 - 0 1 - 3 0 - 1 22 - 2
22 - 7 21 - 5 14 - 2 0% 100% Negligible 212 146 177 0 - 1 0 - 1 0 - 1 22 - 3
21 - 8 20 - 6 13 - 3 0% 100% Negligible 229 169 197 0 - 1 0 - 1 1 - 1 20 - 4
20 - 9 19 - 7 13 - 3 1% 100% Negligible 244 188 215 0 - 1 0 - 1 1 - 2 19 - 5
19 - 10 18 - 8 12 - 4 1% 99% Negligible 257 208 232 0 - 1 0 - 1 1 - 2 18 - 6
18 - 11 17 - 9 11 - 5 2% 97% Negligible 271 229 251 0 - 1 0 - 1 1 - 2 17 - 7
17 - 12 16 - 10 11 - 5 3% 95% Negligible 279 245 263 0 - 1 0 - 1 1 - 2 16 - 8
16 - 13 15 - 11 10 - 6 5% 93% Negligible 290 263 277 0 - 1 0 - 1 1 - 2 15 - 8
15 - 14 14 - 12 10 - 6 6% 88% Negligible 301 279 291 0 - 1 0 - 1 1 - 2 14 - 9
14 - 15 13 - 13 9 - 7 8% 82% Negligible 311 293 303 0 - 1 0 - 1 1 - 2 13 - 10
13 - 16 12 - 14 9 - 7 9% 74% Negligible 318 306 313 0 - 1 0 - 1 1 - 2 12 - 11
12 - 17 11 - 15 8 - 8 10% 65% Negligible 327 319 324 0 - 1 0 - 1 1 - 3 11 - 11
11 - 18 10 - 16 7 - 9 11% 54% Negligible 335 331 334 0 - 1 0 - 1 0 - 3 11 - 12
10 - 19 9 - 17 7 - 9 11% 43% Negligible 342 341 342 0 - 1 0 - 1 0 - 3 10 - 13
9 - 19 8 - 17 6 - 10 10% 33% Negligible 348 349 350 0 - 1 0 - 1 0 - 3 9 - 14
8 - 20 7 - 18 5 - 11 8% 22% Negligible 353 355 355 0 - 1 0 - 1 0 - 3 8 - 15
7 - 21 6 - 19 4 - 12 6% 14% Negligible 357 359 359 0 - 1 0 - 1 0 - 3 7 - 16
6 - 22 5 - 20 4 - 12 4% 8% Negligible 359 362 362 0 - 1 0 - 1 0 - 3 6 - 16
5 - 23 4 - 21 3 - 13 2% 4% Negligible 362 364 364 0 - 1 0 - 2 0 - 3 5 - 17
4 - 24 3 - 22 2 - 14 1% 2% Negligible 364 364 365 0 - 1 0 - 1 0 - 3 4 - 18
3 - 25 2 - 23 1 - 15 0% 1% Negligible 364 365 365 0 - 1 0 - 2 0 - 3 3 - 19
2 - 26 1 - 24 1 - 15 0% 0% Negligible 364 365 365 0 - 1 0 - 1 0 - 3 2 - 20
1 - 27 0 - 25 0 - 16 0% 0% Negligible 365 365 365 0 - 2 0 - 1 0 - 4 1 - 20
Total 7 - 9 100% 0% 16 Negligible 328 319 325 0 - 1 0 - 1 1 - 2 11 - 12


Projected Northeast Finish

Wins Chance Champ Co-Champions Finishing Place (Percent of all possible outcomes)
Indiv. Cumul. 0 1 2 3+ 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th Total
16-0
15-1 0% 100% 100% 97% 3% 0 0
14-2 1% 100% 97% 97% 1% 1 0 1
13-3 1% 99% 95% 81% 14% 1 0 1
12-4 3% 98% 72% 54% 16% 2% 1% 2 1 0 3
11-5 6% 95% 53% 19% 26% 8% 0% 3 2 0 0 6
10-6 9% 89% 15% 2% 5% 5% 3% 1 5 3 0 0 9
9-7 13% 80% 1% 0% 0% 0 2 6 4 1 0 13
8-8 14% 67% 0 2 7 5 1 0 14
7-9 15% 53% 0 1 5 7 2 0 15
6-10 13% 38% 1 4 6 3 0 13
5-11 11% 25% 0 3 6 2 11
4-12 7% 13% 0 3 4 7
3-13 4% 7% 0 1 3 4
2-14 2% 3% 0 2 2
1-15 0% 1% 0 0
0-16 0% 0% 0 0
Total 100% 9% 5% 3% 1% 0% 9 10 11 11 11 12 12 12 12 100


Game Detail
Grades are adjusted for opponent strength in each category. Game stats are not adjusted for oppoent strength. See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.
Offense Defense
Tot Off First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows Tot Def First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Pts Per Shot Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Pts Per Shot
2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot
Season Ratings D- D+ C D+ D+ 31% 51% 38% F D D- C D C- D- C- D- D+ D D- C+ D+ 42% 15% 43% D D D+ C D+ D- B D+ B-
0.99 54% 35% 31% -3 -2 0.90 25% 1.0 .24 18% .25 68% .17 1.13 62% 43% 32% +2 +1 1.06 34% 1.0 .34 15% .26 73% .18
Nov
2
Temple F F F A+ D- 38% 29% 33% F+ D- D F F C- D- F F B+ F D+ B D- 37% 10% 54% D+ D- B D- C C- A+ A+ A+
0.84 35% 27% 47% -4 -1 0.88 24% 0.5 .12 18% .24 46% .11 1.02 74% 40% 29% +3 +1 1.08 24% 0.9 .21 15% .18 60% .11
Nov
5
Syracuse F B+ D F F 28% 38% 34% F F F A+ D B- C F+ D+ F F F F F 45% 16% 39% D- F F F+ F D- D- D+ D-
0.73 64% 26% 12% -13 -3 0.68 13% 1.8 .23 16% .29 63% .18 1.52 83% 50% 45% +21 +1 1.43 42% 1.3 .54 12% .41 71% .29
Nov
8
Dartmouth C C- A+ C+ B 40% 23% 38% D- B- C+ A+ A D- D- A+ D+ B- D- F A+ C+ 38% 14% 48% D+ C+ F A+ C D D+ C- D+
1.10 52% 58% 35% +4 0 1.08 33% 1.6 .52 18% .22 85% .19 1.00 63% 57% 21% -3 +1 0.94 38% 0.7 .28 20% .35 70% .25
Nov
12
Sacred Heart 0.99 54% 35% 34% 0 28% 31% 41% -2 0.93 24% 1.0 .24 15% .17 66% .11 1.07 60% 27% 33% +1 37% 12% 51% +1 1.02 29% 0.8 .23 15% .22 84% .18
8-15 6-16 7-21 8 rb 8 pt 10 to 7-11 11-19 2-6 9-26 9 rb 7 pt 10 to 12-14
Nov
15
Quinnipiac 0.98 58% 31% 31% -1 36% 32% 32% -2 0.91 29% 1.0 .29 16% .23 61% .14 1.04 58% 23% 34% -1 42% 20% 38% 0 0.96 35% 0.7 .31 16% .24 59% .14
11-19 5-16 5-16 10 rb 10 pt 11 to 10-16 12-21 2-10 7-20 12 rb 10 pt 11 to 10-17
Nov
28
Navy 0.97 64% 36% 31% +2 24% 34% 42% -3 0.95 23% 1.0 .23 19% .22 71% .15 1.01 49% 29% 32% -4 40% 18% 42% +1 0.90 33% 0.6 .32 18% .30 67% .20
7-11 6-16 6-20 7 rb 7 pt 12 to 9-13 9-18 2-8 6-19 10 rb 10 pt 12 to 13-19
Nov
29
Fairfield 0.94 50% 36% 30% -3 37% 28% 35% -1 0.89 26% 1.3 .34 21% .24 59% .14 1.05 53% 36% 25% -5 41% 21% 38% 0 0.88 36% 0.9 .36 13% .23 72% .16
9-17 5-13 5-16 8 rb 11 pt 14 to 9-15 11-21 4-11 5-19 12 rb 12 pt 9 to 12-16
Dec
6
Brown 0.93 52% 34% 27% -5 33% 30% 37% -1 0.85 24% 1.0 .24 19% .34 70% .24 1.01 58% 31% 30% -1 47% 10% 43% +2 1.00 32% 0.7 .31 20% .20 58% .12
8-15 5-13 4-17 7 rb 7 pt 12 to 14-21 13-22 1-5 6-20 9 rb 9 pt 13 to 7-12
Dec
13
Loyola MD 0.99 61% 40% 26% -1 34% 30% 36% -2 0.93 23% 1.0 .24 15% .23 68% .16 1.02 55% 21% 29% -4 39% 9% 53% +2 0.93 29% 0.7 .30 15% .17 63% .11
10-17 6-15 5-18 7 rb 8 pt 10 to 10-15 11-20 1-5 8-27 10 rb 10 pt 10 to 7-12
Dec
15
VCU 0.85 45% 31% 28% -8 33% 32% 35% -2 0.79 23% 0.9 .20 20% .26 62% .16 1.20 61% 38% 33% +3 45% 9% 46% +2 1.08 35% 0.7 .40 13% .37 75% .27
7-16 5-15 5-17 8 rb 7 pt 13 to 10-16 13-22 2-4 7-22 10 rb 11 pt 9 to 19-25
Dec
20
Fordham 0.90 48% 36% 29% -4 27% 32% 41% -2 0.85 25% 1.0 .24 21% .27 65% .18 1.14 63% 51% 34% +6 43% 14% 43% +1 1.12 37% 0.7 .33 18% .24 75% .18
6-12 5-15 5-18 8 rb 8 pt 14 to 11-16 13-21 3-7 7-21 10 rb 9 pt 12 to 11-15
Jan
2
Chicago St. 0.97 60% 30% 32% 0 30% 21% 48% -1 0.95 28% 1.0 .28 22% .30 66% .20 1.03 55% 39% 30% -1 37% 26% 37% -1 0.94 35% 0.8 .33 17% .23 77% .18
8-13 3-9 7-21 8 rb 8 pt 14 to 12-18 10-18 5-12 5-17 10 rb 10 pt 11 to 12-15
Jan
4
Wagner 1.01 57% 36% 33% +1 37% 28% 35% -1 0.97 23% 1.1 .26 16% .27 75% .20 0.95 52% 34% 27% -5 41% 20% 39% 0 0.88 37% 0.6 .34 19% .18 73% .13
10-18 5-13 5-16 7 rb 7 pt 10 to 12-17 10-19 3-9 5-19 11 rb 10 pt 12 to 8-11
Jan
8
Le Moyne 0.98 47% 29% 34% -4 32% 28% 40% -1 0.87 29% 1.0 .28 17% .27 67% .18 1.03 65% 25% 30% +1 42% 10% 48% +2 1.02 27% 1.2 .25 18% .27 72% .20
7-16 4-14 7-20 10 rb 10 pt 11 to 12-18 13-20 1-5 7-23 8 rb 7 pt 12 to 13-17
Jan
10
Mercyhurst 0.97 61% 35% 30% 0 35% 28% 36% -1 0.95 30% 0.9 .25 20% .30 68% .20 1.04 63% 49% 23% +1 33% 29% 38% -1 0.97 29% 0.9 .30 13% .16 80% .13
9-15 4-12 5-16 8 rb 7 pt 12 to 12-18 11-17 7-15 4-19 9 rb 9 pt 8 to 8-10
Jan
14
New Haven 1.02 55% 35% 32% -1 30% 30% 40% -2 0.92 26% 1.1 .28 14% .18 76% .14 0.95 57% 35% 30% -1 42% 15% 42% +1 0.97 22% 1.3 .17 17% .18 68% .12
8-15 5-15 6-19 8 rb 9 pt 9 to 8-11 11-20 2-7 6-20 6 rb 5 pt 11 to 7-11
Jan
20
Stonehill 0.99 51% 33% 35% -1 32% 34% 33% -2 0.91 25% 1.0 .24 13% .20 66% .13 1.00 59% 34% 28% -2 40% 14% 46% +1 0.95 30% 0.8 .29 18% .22 70% .16
8-17 6-18 6-17 8 rb 8 pt 9 to 9-13 11-19 2-7 6-22 9 rb 9 pt 12 to 10-14
Jan
23
FDU 1.05 63% 35% 36% +4 26% 26% 48% -1 1.02 27% 1.0 .27 17% .23 60% .14 0.99 60% 44% 23% -4 37% 14% 49% +1 0.91 31% 0.8 .26 16% .24 68% .16
8-12 4-12 8-22 8 rb 8 pt 11 to 8-14 10-17 3-7 5-23 9 rb 8 pt 10 to 10-15
Jan
28
LIU Brooklyn 0.97 50% 36% 34% -2 41% 27% 32% -1 0.93 27% 1.0 .26 19% .31 64% .20 1.00 60% 41% 25% -2 41% 21% 38% 0 0.95 32% 0.8 .28 18% .23 71% .16
9-19 5-13 5-15 8 rb 8 pt 13 to 13-20 12-20 4-10 4-18 10 rb 8 pt 12 to 11-15
Jan
30
New Haven 0.97 52% 33% 30% -3 30% 30% 40% -2 0.87 25% 1.0 .26 15% .18 72% .13 1.00 59% 39% 32% +2 42% 15% 42% +1 1.03 23% 1.3 .19 17% .18 73% .13
7-14 5-15 6-19 8 rb 8 pt 9 to 8-11 12-20 3-7 6-20 6 rb 5 pt 10 to 8-11
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows
Feb
3
FDU 1.00 59% 32% 35% +2 26% 26% 48% -1 0.97 26% 0.9 .24 18% .23 56% .13 1.04 63% 48% 24% -2 37% 14% 49% +1 0.96 32% 0.8 .28 15% .24 71% .17
7-12 4-12 8-22 8 rb 7 pt 11 to 8-14 11-17 3-7 6-23 9 rb 8 pt 10 to 11-15
Feb
6
Stonehill 1.04 53% 35% 37% +2 32% 34% 33% -2 0.96 26% 1.0 .27 13% .20 70% .14 0.95 57% 30% 26% -5 40% 14% 46% +1 0.90 29% 0.8 .27 19% .22 67% .15
9-17 6-18 6-17 8 rb 8 pt 8 to 9-13 11-19 2-7 6-22 9 rb 8 pt 12 to 9-14
Feb
11
Le Moyne 1.03 50% 31% 35% -1 32% 28% 40% -1 0.92 30% 1.0 .31 16% .27 69% .18 0.99 63% 19% 29% -1 42% 10% 48% +2 0.97 26% 1.2 .22 19% .27 70% .19
8-16 4-14 7-20 10 rb 10 pt 11 to 12-18 13-20 1-5 7-23 8 rb 7 pt 13 to 12-17
Feb
13
Mercyhurst 1.02 63% 37% 32% +3 35% 28% 36% -1 1.01 31% 0.9 .28 19% .30 71% .21 1.00 60% 47% 21% -1 33% 29% 38% -1 0.92 28% 0.9 .27 14% .16 75% .12
10-16 5-13 5-16 8 rb 8 pt 12 to 13-18 10-17 7-15 4-19 9 rb 8 pt 9 to 8-10
Feb
20
Wagner 0.97 55% 34% 31% -2 37% 28% 35% -1 0.92 22% 1.1 .23 16% .27 72% .20 1.00 55% 37% 29% -2 41% 20% 39% 0 0.93 38% 0.6 .36 19% .18 77% .14
10-17 4-13 5-16 7 rb 7 pt 11 to 12-16 11-19 3-9 5-19 11 rb 11 pt 12 to 9-11
Feb
24
Chicago St. 1.02 63% 33% 33% +2 30% 21% 48% -1 1.00 29% 1.1 .31 21% .30 69% .21 0.98 52% 37% 28% -4 37% 26% 37% -1 0.89 34% 0.8 .30 18% .23 74% .17
8-13 3-9 7-21 8 rb 9 pt 14 to 12-18 9-18 4-12 5-17 10 rb 9 pt 12 to 11-15
Feb
27
LIU Brooklyn 0.93 48% 34% 32% -4 41% 27% 32% -1 0.88 26% 0.9 .24 20% .31 61% .19 1.04 62% 44% 26% +1 41% 21% 38% 0 0.99 33% 0.7 .30 18% .23 74% .17
9-19 4-13 5-15 8 rb 8 pt 13 to 12-19 13-20 5-10 5-18 10 rb 9 pt 12 to 11-15