Southern Illinois
Missouri Valley
2019-20 - 2025-26 - 2026-27
Switch to All-time Team Page
All team stats adjusted for opponents. See methodology page for details.

Predictive Rating +2.9 121
Results Rating +1.4 135
Consistency 0.13 71
Pace 71.8 96
Improvement +3.0 71

Overall 1st FGA Second Chance TOs Free
throws
Shot Selection
Offense D+ 271 C- D+ C D+ D+
Defense B+ 32 B- B- B B- C+

Offense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 42% 81 C+ 60% 107 +3.2 70
2 Pt. Jumpers 54% 35 B 43% 46 +4.6 20
Three Pointers 29% 361 F+ 28% 357 -8.8 361
Shot Selection/Accuracy D+ -0.8 291 C -0.1 167
1st FG Attempt C- 1.00 200
Second Chance C 29.7% 195 D 0.93 319 D+ 0.27 264
Opponents' Steals C 9.6% 197
Other Turnovers C+ 6.9% 127
Turnovers C 16.5% 164
Freethrows C- 0.29 220 D 69% 293 D+ 0.20 248
Total Offense D+ -3.8 271

Assists Opponents' Blocks
Close Shots B- 55% 80 C+ 9.9% 120
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots C- 23% 210 B- 3.4% 66
Three Pointers C+ 87% 128 C+ 0.7% 129
Total D+ 52% 262 C+ 5.4% 169


Defense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 37% 243 C+ 55% 106 -2.0 106
2 Pt. Jumpers 22% 137 C- 39% 233 +0.7 244
Three Pointers 42% 151 B+ 30% 37 -2.0 95
Shot Selection/Accuracy C+ -0.3 122 B -3.0 59
1st FG Attempt B- 0.96 66
Second Chance C+ 28.5% 108 C+ 1.00 122 B- 0.28 98
Turnovers from Steals B 11.4% 50
Other Turnovers C+ 7.7% 119
Turnovers B 19.1% 53
Freethrows B- 0.28 110 B 70% 50 B- 0.20 83
Total Defense B+ +6.7 32

Assists Blocks
Close Shots C+ 47% 146 C+ 12.2% 124
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots C- 29% 254 C+ 5.8% 112
Three Pointers C- 86% 244 B- 1.3% 88
Total C 55% 167 C+ 6.3% 122

Miscellaneous
Offense Defense
Possession Length 16.2 62 17.7 252
Fast Break Points Per Possession 0.19 114 0.15 96
Consistency 0.11 54 0.12 168
Improvement -3.8 337 +6.9 3

NCAA Tournament Selection
At-Large Selection Status Out of Consideration
Projected Seeding Not in Tournament  

Prediction Ranges
Pessimistic
5th Percentile
Expected
50th Percentile
Optimistic
95th Percentile
Predictive Rating Rank 128 121 110
Results Rating Rank 156 137 121
Conference Record 10 - 10 10 - 10 10 - 10
Conference Finish 8 8 8
NCAA Tourney Seed None None None
NCAA Tourney Finish None None None

NowWin NextLose Next
#1 Overall Seed 0% 0% 0%
#1 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 2 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 4 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 6 Seed 0% 0% 0%
NCAA Tourney Bid 4% 6% 0%
At-Large Bid if not Auto Qualifier 0% 0% 0%
Average Seed 12.7 12.7 n/a
.500 or above 70% 100% 0%
.500 or above in Conference 100% 100% 100.0%
Conference Champion 0% 0% 0.0%
Last Place in Conference 0% 0% 0.0%
First Four0% 0% 0%
First Round4% 6% 0%
Second Round0% 0% 0%
Sweet Sixteen0% 0% 0%
Elite Eight0% 0% 0%
Final Four0% 0% 0%
Championship Game0% 0% 0%
National Champion0% 0% 0%

Projected Record by Quadrant
QuadProjectedProjected Cumulative
Quad 1a0 - 00 - 0
Quad 1b2 - 02 - 0
Quad 23 - 74 - 7
Quad 34 - 78 - 15
Quad 48 - 116 - 16


Date Opponent Result/Prediction Lead Record Total Rating Offense Defense
Avg Time Overall Conf Total First
FGA
2nd Chance TOs Total First
FGA
2nd Chance TOs
 Fri, Nov 7 360 UMKC W 101 - 78 98% +11  66% 1 - 0 C+ +2 A- +11 A+ A- C+ F -10 C+ F D-
 Wed, Nov 12 81 @Nevada L 81 - 86 OT 24% +1  56% 1 - 1 B- +5 C +1 C- F+ A+ B +5 A+ A+ F
 Mon, Nov 17 131 @North Dakota St. L 85 - 92 42% -4  11% 1 - 2 C- -2 C+ +3 B+ C D D+ -4 D- D- C-
 Sun, Nov 23 274 Delaware W 79 - 59 81% +10  99% 2 - 2 B+ +14 C+ +2 D+ B+ C- A+ +13 B- C- A+
 Mon, Nov 24 123 UAB L 73 - 81 50% -5  9% 2 - 3 D+ -5 C +0 C- D A+ D -5 C F C+
 Wed, Nov 26 119 @Memphis L 58 - 74 38% -11  0% 2 - 4 D -10 F -12 F C- B C+ +1 C+ D- B
 Sat, Nov 29 299 Arkansas Little Rock W 74 - 65 90% +1  59% 3 - 4 C- -2 C -0 A+ D- F C -1 F B A+
 Wed, Dec 3 94 @High Point W 86 - 84 28% -3  27% 4 - 4 B +11 B+ +8 C- A+ A B- +3 C+ B- C+
 Wed, Dec 10 230 Tennessee Martin W 83 - 54 82% +9  83% 5 - 4 A +22 B+ +9 A+ B+ C+ A+ +13 A A+ A+
 Sat, Dec 13 136 @Richmond L 84 - 93 OT 44% -2  30% 5 - 5 C- -4 D- -6 F+ B F B +4 D- A+ C+
 Thu, Dec 18 99 Illinois St. L 68 - 75 53% +0  58% 5 - 6 0 - 1 C- -5 D -5 C+ B+ F C+ +1 B- F B-
 Sun, Dec 21 113 @Bradley L 69 - 73 37% -4  10% 5 - 7 0 - 2 C+ +2 D -5 D- C C+ A- +8 B D A+
 Mon, Dec 29 125 @Murray St. L 81 - 84 39% -7  1% 5 - 8 0 - 3 C+ +3 C +0 D A+ D+ B- +3 F A+ B+
 Thu, Jan 1 155 Valparaiso W 75 - 70 71% +5  78% 6 - 8 1 - 3 C+ +2 D -6 D- C- A A- +8 A+ A+ D+
 Sun, Jan 4 68 @Belmont W 68 - 67 20% +0  58% 7 - 8 2 - 3 B+ +13 D+ -4 B- C- F A+ +17 C+ A A
 Wed, Jan 7 115 @Illinois-Chicago L 57 - 70 37% -8  10% 7 - 9 2 - 4 D+ -7 F+ -9 B- F D- C+ +1 A F F+
 Wed, Jan 14 206 Drake L 73 - 76 OT 79% +4  65% 7 - 10 2 - 5 D -8 F -15 F D- A B+ +7 A+ D- B+
 Sat, Jan 17 68 Belmont L 68 - 73 39% -2  35% 7 - 11 2 - 6 C +1 D- -7 D- D C A- +8 A+ C F
 Wed, Jan 21 155 @Valparaiso L 63 - 69 49% -11  10% 7 - 12 2 - 7 C- -3 D+ -4 D- D+ C C+ +1 F A C+
 Wed, Jan 28 89 Northern Iowa W 65 - 50 48% +6  74% 8 - 12 3 - 7 A +18 C -0 A F B+ A+ +20 A A+ A+
 Sat, Jan 31 115 Illinois-Chicago L 66 - 68 60% +6  73% 8 - 13 3 - 8 C- -2 D+ -3 B- F A+ C+ +2 A F A+
 Tue, Feb 3 99 @Illinois St. W 54 - 50 30% +1  51% 9 - 13 4 - 8 B+ +12 F -15 D+ F F A+ +27 A+ A+ C+
 Fri, Feb 6 125 Murray St. L 81 - 91 62% -6  29% 9 - 14 4 - 9 D -10 C- -1 C- D- A+ F+ -9 F A+ A
 Mon, Feb 9 200 @Indiana St. W 80 - 65 58% +7  80% 10 - 14 5 - 9 A- +16 C +1 B F+ C- A+ +14 A+ F+ A-
 Thu, Feb 12 295 Evansville W 86 - 60 90% +15  91% 11 - 14 6 - 9 A- +15 B+ +8 B A C A- +8 C A- A-
 Sun, Feb 15 113 Bradley L 60 - 70 60% -5  4% 11 - 15 6 - 10 D -10 F -15 F F A B+ +5 B B F+
 Wed, Feb 18 206 @Drake W 66 - 61 59% -1  43% 12 - 15 7 - 10 B- +6 F -11 F F+ D A+ +16 A B+ A
 Sat, Feb 21 89 @Northern Iowa W 59 - 57 27% +5  89% 13 - 15 8 - 10 B +11 C +1 A B F A +11 A- F A+
 Wed, Feb 25 200 Indiana St. W 66 - 55 78% +9  78% 14 - 15 9 - 10 B- +6 F -12 F D- A- A+ +18 A+ C A+
 Sun, Mar 1 295 @Evansville W 81 - 67 77% +4  75% 15 - 15 10 - 10 B +9 A +11 C+ D- A+ C -1 D+ A+ F
 Thu, Mar 5 206 Drake W 74 - 69 70%
Totals 16 - 15 10 - 10 +3 D+ -4 A+ C D+ B+ +7 F+ D D+



Game Detail
Grades are adjusted for opponent strength in each category. Game stats are not adjusted for oppoent strength. See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.
Offense Defense
Tot Off First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows Tot Def First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot
2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot
Season Ratings D+ C+ B F+ C 42% 54% 29% D+ C- C D D+ C C- D D+ B+ C+ C- B+ B 37% 22% 42% C+ B- C+ C+ B- B B- B B-
1.03 60% 43% 28% 0 -1 1.00 30% 0.9 .27 16% .29 69% .20 0.99 55% 39% 30% -3 0 0.96 29% 1.0 .28 19% .28 70% .20
Nov
7
UMKC A- A+ A+ A- A+ 57% 25% 19% C A+ D+ A+ A- C+ A+ F A- F A+ F F+ C+ 38% 27% 35% C C+ F F F D- F B+ D-
1.33 77% 54% 40% +16 +1 1.36 33% 1.4 .48 16% .41 62% .25 1.02 29% 47% 37% -7 -1 0.85 34% 1.2 .40 16% .36 61% .22
Nov
12
Nevada C D- A F C 40% 34% 26% F+ C- D+ F F+ A+ A D- B B A+ F A+ A+ 25% 30% 46% A- A+ B- A+ A+ F F+ B D
1.03 48% 50% 27% -3 -2 0.93 23% 0.9 .20 10% .41 66% .27 1.09 33% 50% 25% -9 -2 0.80 32% 0.7 .23 5% .44 73% .32
Nov
17
North Dakota St. C+ A A+ F A- 45% 29% 25% C- B+ A- F+ C D D B- D+ D+ A+ F+ F F+ 25% 25% 50% B D- B F D- C- D+ F F+
1.10 72% 69% 21% +10 -1 1.22 37% 0.7 .27 21% .21 77% .16 1.19 40% 47% 47% +7 -2 1.13 28% 1.4 .39 15% .29 84% .24
Nov
23
Delaware C+ A+ A F C+ 20% 51% 29% F D+ A C- B+ C- A+ C- A+ A+ F F A- C- 11% 32% 57% A+ B- F A C- A+ A+ A- A+
1.16 90% 48% 14% +3 -5 0.98 41% 1.0 .41 15% .43 80% .34 0.87 80% 53% 30% +3 -3 1.02 30% 0.7 .20 28% .14 71% .10
Nov
24
UAB C A A F C- 34% 29% 36% D- C- C F D A+ D+ A+ C D B C- C- C- 35% 33% 33% A C F+ F F C+ C- C C-
1.04 70% 47% 19% -1 -1 0.97 26% 0.7 .18 11% .21 85% .18 1.15 53% 39% 33% -2 -2 0.95 38% 1.3 .50 13% .33 70% .23
Nov
26
Memphis F C- F F F 37% 44% 19% F F B F C- B A+ F A+ C+ B B+ D+ C+ 39% 20% 41% D+ C+ C+ F D- B F+ F F
0.83 56% 21% 13% -14 -3 0.67 38% 0.7 .27 19% .58 61% .35 1.06 53% 30% 35% -3 0 0.96 34% 1.4 .49 21% .36 80% .29
Nov
29
Arkansas Little Rock C C+ A+ A+ A+ 49% 17% 34% C+ A+ C- F D- F A+ F B C F F A+ F 34% 23% 43% F+ F C- A+ B A+ C A+ B+
1.16 65% 86% 43% +16 +1 1.37 35% 0.8 .26 23% .41 60% .25 1.02 81% 55% 25% +6 -1 1.13 31% 0.8 .24 25% .23 45% .10
Dec
3
High Point B+ C- F A- C 45% 24% 31% D+ C- C+ A+ A+ A F C- F B- A- A+ F C+ 42% 15% 42% C+ C+ C+ B B- C+ D+ C D+
1.16 58% 29% 39% 0 0 1.02 33% 1.8 .58 16% .23 71% .16 1.13 50% 25% 41% -1 +1 1.02 30% 1.1 .33 15% .38 75% .29
Dec
10
Tennessee Martin B+ A C A- A+ 52% 22% 26% B+ A+ C A+ B+ C+ B D C+ A+ A+ B A A+ 28% 12% 60% D+ A A- A+ A+ A+ A- C B+
1.19 73% 36% 38% +9 +1 1.22 32% 1.2 .39 19% .37 67% .25 0.77 43% 33% 27% -11 0 0.80 29% 0.5 .16 27% .24 67% .16
Dec
13
Richmond D- F+ C- D+ D 27% 51% 22% F F+ B+ C B F A A+ A+ B F F B F+ 30% 30% 41% C+ D- A+ F A+ C+ D+ B- C-
0.96 50% 37% 31% -4 -5 0.85 36% 1.1 .40 25% .38 80% .31 1.06 72% 56% 32% +8 -2 1.15 6% 1.5 .09 15% .36 74% .27
Dec
18
Illinois St. D D- A+ F B 33% 44% 23% F C+ B- A B+ F A+ F B- C+ F+ F A+ B- 35% 19% 46% C- B- D- F F B- D+ A+ A
0.97 50% 62% 18% +2 -3 1.00 29% 1.2 .35 23% .41 55% .22 1.07 72% 50% 25% +1 0 1.04 33% 1.3 .44 19% .32 39% .12
Dec
21
Bradley D C A+ F D- 33% 35% 31% D D- C C+ C C+ D+ D- D A- B- A+ F B 43% 27% 29% C B D- C- D A+ D+ F F
0.96 59% 56% 13% -4 -2 0.90 30% 1.0 .30 18% .31 67% .21 1.02 55% 14% 47% -2 -1 0.96 31% 1.1 .34 21% .35 90% .32
Dec
29
Murray St. C D D+ C- D- 58% 31% 11% C+ D B- A+ A+ D+ C- D+ D+ B- F A+ F F 31% 21% 48% B+ F A+ A+ A+ B+ C- C- C-
1.09 50% 35% 33% -6 0 0.91 36% 1.4 .51 17% .28 71% .20 1.13 88% 27% 40% +11 -1 1.23 23% 0.7 .16 19% .35 76% .26
Jan
1
Valparaiso D F D C F+ 44% 20% 36% B- D- F+ A+ C- A A+ F A+ A- A+ B A+ A+ 38% 29% 34% D A+ C+ A+ A+ D+ F F F
1.00 45% 30% 33% -8 0 0.88 23% 1.2 .28 12% .64 60% .38 0.94 43% 31% 21% -14 -1 0.71 30% 0.6 .17 13% .45 83% .37
Jan
4
Belmont D+ D A+ C+ B 28% 32% 40% F+ B- B+ F C- F C- F F+ A+ D+ F A+ B- 61% 14% 25% D- C+ B- A+ A A F+ A+ B-
0.98 50% 50% 35% +2 -2 1.02 38% 0.8 .30 26% .25 62% .16 0.97 67% 67% 27% +7 +3 1.20 26% 0.9 .22 23% .37 50% .19
Jan
7
Illinois-Chicago F+ D+ A+ D- B 41% 25% 33% D+ B- F F F D- F F F C+ A A A+ A+ 51% 15% 34% F A D- F F F+ F+ A D+
0.88 52% 62% 29% +1 0 1.04 17% 0.6 .10 23% .08 50% .04 1.08 46% 29% 25% -12 +2 0.81 41% 1.3 .54 14% .40 64% .25
Jan
14
Drake F B D+ F F 32% 31% 37% D F C F D- A B D B- B+ D F A+ A+ 27% 19% 54% C A+ B+ F D- B+ F C- F
0.92 65% 32% 13% -11 -2 0.76 30% 0.7 .20 10% .34 67% .22 0.96 64% 50% 18% -9 -1 0.83 22% 1.7 .37 18% .38 72% .28
Jan
17
Belmont D- D F D+ F+ 36% 20% 44% C+ D- D C- D C A A+ A+ A- F+ A- A+ A+ 40% 19% 40% B+ A+ D- A- C F F C F+
0.98 50% 20% 32% -8 0 0.86 26% 1.0 .26 17% .35 85% .30 1.05 71% 30% 19% -5 0 0.92 33% 1.1 .35 13% .38 70% .27
Jan
21
Valparaiso D+ B+ F F F+ 51% 22% 27% B- D- C D D+ C A+ F A+ C+ F+ A F F 31% 31% 38% C F A+ F A C+ F B F
0.99 67% 11% 18% -8 +1 0.88 31% 0.8 .26 17% .57 60% .34 1.08 67% 25% 47% +6 -2 1.10 15% 1.5 .22 16% .56 67% .37
Jan
28
Northern Iowa C D+ A+ A+ A+ 31% 39% 31% F A C- F F B+ A F D+ A+ B+ B+ A+ A+ 51% 13% 36% D- A A+ A+ A+ A+ D+ A C+
0.99 53% 53% 40% +7 -3 1.10 24% 0.4 .09 15% .34 47% .16 0.76 52% 33% 25% -8 +2 0.89 10% 0.7 .06 26% .27 62% .16
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows
Jan
31
Illinois-Chicago D+ D- C- A+ B- 47% 26% 28% C B- F F F A+ A C- A C+ C+ A A+ A+ 47% 16% 37% D- A F C F A+ F F F
1.00 50% 33% 46% 0 0 1.02 16% 0.4 .06 15% .39 73% .29 1.03 55% 29% 19% -12 +1 0.81 49% 1.0 .49 26% .53 81% .43
Feb
3
Illinois St. F B+ A- F C- 38% 40% 22% D- D+ D- F F F C- B+ C A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ 28% 37% 35% A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ C+ A+ A+ A+
0.79 65% 44% 10% -3 -3 0.91 21% 0.3 .06 22% .28 73% .21 0.74 47% 25% 26% -12 -3 0.72 19% 0.9 .17 18% .18 60% .11
Feb
6
Murray St. C- A C- F C 34% 34% 32% F+ C- D D- D- A+ B+ B+ A- F+ F+ F F F 45% 10% 45% F+ F A+ A+ A+ A F C- F
1.11 68% 37% 28% 0 -2 0.98 27% 0.9 .24 10% .35 78% .27 1.24 68% 80% 50% +20 +2 1.45 21% 0.6 .13 21% .45 77% .34
Feb
9
Indiana St. C B B C B+ 46% 29% 25% C- B B- F F+ C- D- D+ D- A+ B+ C- A+ A+ 49% 10% 41% C- A+ B F F+ A- C C+ C
1.07 63% 47% 33% +5 -1 1.10 35% 0.6 .20 16% .21 69% .14 0.87 54% 40% 20% -10 +2 0.86 22% 1.6 .35 23% .26 67% .17
Feb
12
Evansville B+ A+ F C B- 42% 13% 45% A- B A+ B- A C F A- D- A- D+ F+ B- C 21% 25% 55% B- C C- A+ A- A- A+ C- A+
1.26 74% 29% 36% +7 +1 1.18 43% 1.1 .47 16% .19 82% .16 0.88 64% 46% 31% +1 -2 1.00 23% 0.6 .14 22% .08 75% .06
Feb
15
Bradley F C A+ F F 35% 41% 24% F+ F D- F F A C- A+ B B+ D+ A- B+ B 37% 24% 39% C B A- D B F+ A+ A+ A+
0.87 58% 50% 0% -7 -3 0.81 24% 0.4 .11 14% .32 84% .27 1.01 64% 29% 30% -2 0 0.97 21% 1.1 .24 10% .14 56% .08
Feb
18
Drake F D- F B+ F 35% 24% 42% C F C+ F F+ D C F D A+ C A- A+ A 32% 23% 45% C+ A C+ A B+ A A- A+ A+
0.93 53% 8% 39% -6 -1 0.89 31% 0.5 .17 17% .29 59% .17 0.86 59% 33% 25% -7 -1 0.87 26% 0.9 .23 20% .23 46% .11
Feb
21
Northern Iowa C B+ B- A- A+ 38% 27% 36% D+ A A C B F F F F A B- C- A B+ 36% 31% 33% A+ A- F C+ F A+ B+ F B-
0.96 65% 42% 38% +5 -1 1.11 35% 0.9 .31 29% .07 33% .02 0.93 56% 43% 27% -3 -2 0.93 31% 1.1 .34 23% .19 78% .15
Feb
25
Indiana St. F A F F F 46% 25% 30% C F F C- D- A- C A+ B A+ B- A+ A A+ 29% 18% 53% A+ A+ B- D C A+ B- A+ A-
0.93 69% 21% 12% -9 0 0.84 23% 0.9 .21 11% .26 88% .22 0.78 57% 22% 27% -9 0 0.84 23% 1.1 .26 25% .23 50% .11
Mar
1
Evansville A C+ F A+ C+ 43% 22% 35% B- C+ B+ F D- A+ D A+ C C C D- D+ D+ 31% 22% 47% D+ D+ B- A+ A+ F C- F D
1.27 61% 25% 47% +5 0 1.13 37% 0.6 .23 9% .22 92% .21 1.05 60% 45% 35% +3 -1 1.06 19% 0.3 .06 14% .29 81% .24




Numbers in tables represent percent chance of outcome occurring.




Projected Missouri Valley Finish

0-20 1-19 2-18 3-17 4-16 5-15 6-14 7-13 8-12 9-11 10-10 11-9 12-8 13-7 14-6 15-5 16-4 17-3 18-2 19-1 20-0 Total
1st 1st
2nd 2nd
3rd 3rd
4th 4th
5th 5th
6th 6th
7th 7th
8th 100.0 100.0 8th
9th 9th
10th 10th
11th 11th
Total 100.0 Total



Missouri Valley Regular Season Championship

Record Champion Total Outright 2-Way 3-Way 4-Way 5-Way 6-Way 7-Way 8-Way
20-0
19-1
18-2
17-3
16-4
15-5
14-6
13-7
12-8
11-9
10-10 0.0%
Total



NCAA Tournament Selection

Conf RecordRecord ChanceTourney
Bid
AutoAt-LargeAvg
Seed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 No Bid At-Large if not Auto
20-0
19-1
18-2
17-3
16-4
15-5
14-6
13-7
12-8
11-9
10-10 100.0% 4.1% 4.1% 12.7 0.0 1.4 2.6 0.1 95.9
9-11
8-12
7-13
6-14
5-15
4-16
3-17
2-18
1-19
0-20
Total 100% 4.1% 4.1% 0.0% 12.7 95.9 0.0%


Best / Worst Case Scenarios

ChanceTourney
Bid
Avg
Seed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Win Out 4.1% 100.0% 12.7 0.2 33.7 63.9 2.1
Win Out, Lose in Conf. Tourney Championship 5.5%
Win Out, Lose in Conf. Tourney Semi-Final 9.4%
Lose Out 30.5%