• Methodology
• All-Time
  • Season Archives
  • Program Rankings
  • Team Rankings
• 2026 - 2027
  • Team Rankings
  • Offense
  • Defenses
  • Conferences

  ---

  • Projected Seeding
  • Selection Simulation
  • At-Large Selection

  ---

  • Preseason

North Alabama
Unified Athletic
2025-26 - 2026-27 - 2027-28
Switch to Preseason Page
Switch to All-time Team Page

All team stats adjusted for opponents. See methodology page for details. Rating Rank vs Preseason INCC Stats Predictive Rating -5.6 258 78% INCC Stats Results Rating +6.0 96 100% Consistency 0.00 80 Pace 66.4 274 Improvement - - Overall 1st FGA Second Chance TOs Free throws Shot Selection Offense C- 245 C C- C- C B Defense D+ 273 D+ B- D C D- Offense Breakdown Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect Close Shots 44% 41 C- 55% 216 +2.6 82 2 Pt. Jumpers 36% 194 C+ 37% 130 -1.3 249 Three Pointers 40% 224 C 32% 201 -1.3 225 Selection / Accuracy B +1.1 56 C- -1.1 211 1st FG Attempt C 0.99 173 Second Chance D+ 27.1% 274 C+ 1.04 133 C- 0.28 226 Opponents' Steals D 11.5% 315 Other Turnovers C+ 7.3% 117 Turnovers C- 18.8% 263 Freethrows C+ 0.32 156 C 69% 193 C 0.22 156 Total Offense C- -2.7 245 Assists Opponents' Blocks Close Shots F 31% 363 B- 9.6% 111 2 Pt. Jumpers Shots D 15% 297 C+ 4.2% 124 Three Pointers F+ 74% 349 D+ 1.3% 290 Total F 42% 363 C+ 5.4% 161 Defense Breakdown Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect Close Shots 41% 115 C- 59% 246 +2.4 258 2 Pt. Jumpers 12% 360 D+ 40% 302 -2.3 25 Three Pointers 47% 45 C 33% 190 +2.6 297 Selection / Accuracy D- +1.3 357 C- +1.3 232 1st FG Attempt D+ 1.04 285 Second Chance C 30.0% 168 B- 0.92 84 B- 0.28 105 Turnovers from Steals C- 8.8% 252 Other Turnovers D- 6.4% 348 Turnovers D 15.2% 320 Freethrows C 0.32 210 C 69% 150 C 0.22 196 Total Defense D+ -2.9 273 Assists Blocks Close Shots C+ 47% 108 D+ 9.1% 259 2 Pt. Jumpers Shots C- 28% 238 D+ 3.5% 261 Three Pointers C 85% 152 C+ 1.3% 90 Total C 58% 191 D+ 4.7% 252 Miscellaneous Offense Defense Possession Length 17.4 215 16.4 81 Fast Break Points Per Possession 0.12 316 0.23 314 Consistency 0.04 172 0.05 179

NCAA Tournament Selection At-Large Chances Negligible (0%) Projected Seeding Not in Tournament   Prediction Ranges Pessimistic 5th Percentile Expected 50th Percentile Optimistic 95th Percentile Overall Record 8 - 20 13 - 17 19 - 11 Predictive Rating Rank 321 252 168 Results Rating Rank 333 243 144 Conference Record 4 - 12 8 - 8 13 - 3 Conference Finish 9 5 1 NCAA Tourney Seed None None 16 NCAA Tourney Finish None None Opening Round Last Game Day Change Predictive Rating Rank 282 → 258 ▲ 24 Results Rating Rank 28 → 96 ▼ 68 Conference Champion 8% → 11% ▲ 3% At-Large Chance 0% → 0% – Opening Round Bye 16% → 20% ▲ 4% Projected Seed At-Large Status Negligible → Negligible L, 72 - 81 vs 67 Oklahoma Now Win Next Lose Next #1 Overall Seed 0% 0% 0% #1 Seed 0% 0% 0% Top 2 Seed 0% 0% 0% Top 4 Seed 0% 0% 0% Top 6 Seed 0% 0% 0% Opening Round Bye 20% 45% 19% NCAA Tourney Bid 8% 12% 8% At-Large Status Negligible Negligible Negligible At-Large Bid 0% 0% 0% Average Seed 15.3 14.8 15.3 .500 or above 37% 63% 37% .500 or above in Conf 61% 68% 61% Conference Champion 61% 17% 11% Last Place in Conference 1% 0% 1% Opening Round 7% 7% 7% First Round 5% 8% 5% Second Round 0% 0% 0% Sweet Sixteen 0% 0% 0% Elite Eight 0% 0% 0% Final Four 0% 0% 0% Championship Game 0% 0% 0% National Champion 0% 0% 0% Next Game: Miami (FL) (Away) - 1% chance of victory Wins-Avg Loss Future Record Wins Chance At-Large Chance Avg Seed At-Large Selection Chances Indiv. Cumul. 26 - 4 25 - 3 0% 100% Negligible 25 - 5 24 - 4 0% 100% Negligible 24 - 6 23 - 5 0% 100% Negligible 23 - 7 22 - 6 0% 100% Negligible 22 - 8 21 - 7 1% 100% Negligible 21 - 9 20 - 8 1% 99% Negligible 20 - 10 19 - 9 2% 98% Negligible 19 - 11 18 - 10 4% 95% Negligible 18 - 12 17 - 11 5% 92% Negligible 17 - 13 16 - 12 7% 87% Negligible 16 - 14 15 - 13 9% 80% Negligible 15 - 15 14 - 14 10% 71% Negligible 14 - 16 13 - 15 11% 61% Negligible 13 - 17 12 - 16 11% 51% Negligible 12 - 17 11 - 16 10% 40% Negligible 11 - 18 10 - 17 9% 30% Negligible 10 - 19 9 - 18 7% 21% Negligible 9 - 20 8 - 19 5% 14% Negligible 8 - 20 7 - 19 4% 9% Negligible 7 - 21 6 - 20 2% 5% Negligible 6 - 22 5 - 21 1% 2% Negligible 5 - 23 4 - 22 1% 1% Negligible 4 - 24 3 - 23 0% 0% Negligible 3 - 25 2 - 24 0% 0% Negligible 2 - 26 1 - 25 0% 0% Negligible Projected Record by Quadrant Quad Projected Projected Cumulative Quad 1a 0 - 1 0 - 1 Quad 1b 0 - 1 0 - 2 Quad 2 0 - 2 0 - 4 Quad 3 3 - 5 3 - 9 Quad 4 11 - 7 13 - 16

Stat Type	Preseason	Nov 8	Current
Predictive Rank	310	282	258
Results Rank		28	96
Projected Overall Record	11 - 18	13 - 17	13 - 16
Projected Conference Record	7 - 9	8 - 8	False
Conference Champion	6%	8%	11%
Conference Finish	6	5	5
NCAA Tournament Seed
Opening Round Bye	5%	16%	20%
At-Large Tourney Chance	0%	0%	0%
At Large Status	Negligible	Negligible	Negligible

NCAA Tournament Selection

Wins-Avg Loss	Future Record	Wins Chance			Tourney Bid	Auto	At-Large	Avg Seed	At-Large Selection Chances		1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16		No Bid
		Indiv.	Cumul.
26 - 4	25 - 3	0%	100%		80%	80%		13	Negligible														0					0
25 - 5	24 - 4	0%	100%		93%	93%		13	Negligible														0	0				0
24 - 6	23 - 5	0%	100%		79%	79%		14	Negligible														0	0				0
23 - 7	22 - 6	0%	100%		69%	69%		14	Negligible															0	0			0
22 - 8	21 - 7	1%	100%		68%	68%		15	Negligible															0	0			0
21 - 9	20 - 8	1%	99%		56%	56%		15	Negligible															0	1			1
20 - 10	19 - 9	2%	98%		46%	46%		15	Negligible																1			1
19 - 11	18 - 10	4%	95%		38%	38%		15	Negligible																1	0		2
18 - 12	17 - 11	5%	92%		25%	25%		16	Negligible																1	1		4
17 - 13	16 - 12	7%	87%		17%	17%		16	Negligible																0	1		6
16 - 14	15 - 13	9%	80%		9%	9%		16	Negligible																	1		8
15 - 15	14 - 14	10%	71%		5%	5%		16	Negligible																	0		9
14 - 16	13 - 15	11%	61%		3%	3%		16	Negligible																	0		10
13 - 17	12 - 16	11%	51%		1%	1%		16	Negligible																	0		11
12 - 17	11 - 16	10%	40%		0%	0%		16	Negligible																	0		10
11 - 18	10 - 17	9%	30%		0%	0%		16	Negligible																	0		9
10 - 19	9 - 18	7%	21%		0%	0%		16	Negligible																	0		7
9 - 20	8 - 19	5%	14%						Negligible																			5
8 - 20	7 - 19	4%	9%						Negligible																			4
7 - 21	6 - 20	2%	5%						Negligible																			2
6 - 22	5 - 21	1%	2%						Negligible																			1
5 - 23	4 - 22	1%	1%						Negligible																			1
4 - 24	3 - 23	0%	0%						Negligible																			0
3 - 25	2 - 24	0%	0%						Negligible																			0
2 - 26	1 - 25	0%	0%						Negligible																			0
Total		100%			8%	8%	0%	15	Negligible															1	4	4		92

At-Large Selection Detail

Wins-Avg Loss	Future Record	Avg Conf Record	Wins Chance			At-Large	Opening Bye	Avg Seed	At-Large Selection Chances		Average Rating Rank			Average Quad Records
			Indiv.	Cumul.							Predictive	Results	NET	Quad 1	Quad 2	Quad 3	Quad 4
26 - 4	25 - 3	16 - 1	0%	100%					Negligible		115	47	80	0 - 2	1 - 1	6 - 1	19 - 1
25 - 5	24 - 4	16 - 1	0%	100%					Negligible		128	65	95	0 - 2	0 - 1	6 - 1	19 - 1
24 - 6	23 - 5	15 - 2	0%	100%					Negligible		133	83	106	0 - 2	0 - 1	6 - 2	18 - 1
23 - 7	22 - 6	14 - 3	0%	100%					Negligible		144	98	119	0 - 2	0 - 1	5 - 2	17 - 2
22 - 8	21 - 7	14 - 3	1%	100%					Negligible		152	111	130	0 - 2	0 - 1	5 - 2	17 - 2
21 - 9	20 - 8	13 - 4	1%	99%					Negligible		160	124	140	0 - 2	0 - 1	5 - 3	16 - 3
20 - 10	19 - 9	12 - 5	2%	98%					Negligible		169	137	152	0 - 2	0 - 1	4 - 3	15 - 3
19 - 11	18 - 10	12 - 5	4%	95%					Negligible		181	151	165	0 - 2	0 - 1	4 - 4	15 - 4
18 - 12	17 - 11	11 - 6	5%	92%					Negligible		194	166	179	0 - 2	0 - 1	4 - 4	14 - 4
17 - 13	16 - 12	11 - 6	7%	87%					Negligible		205	181	192	0 - 2	0 - 1	3 - 4	13 - 5
16 - 14	15 - 13	10 - 7	9%	80%					Negligible		219	198	208	0 - 2	0 - 2	3 - 5	13 - 5
15 - 15	14 - 14	9 - 8	10%	71%					Negligible		232	215	223	0 - 2	0 - 2	3 - 5	12 - 6
14 - 16	13 - 15	9 - 8	11%	61%					Negligible		245	232	239	0 - 2	0 - 2	3 - 5	11 - 7
13 - 17	12 - 16	8 - 9	11%	51%					Negligible		258	250	254	0 - 2	0 - 2	2 - 5	10 - 7
12 - 17	11 - 16	7 - 10	10%	40%					Negligible		270	267	269	0 - 2	0 - 2	2 - 6	10 - 8
11 - 18	10 - 17	7 - 10	9%	30%					Negligible		280	283	282	0 - 2	0 - 2	2 - 6	9 - 8
10 - 19	9 - 18	6 - 11	7%	21%					Negligible		290	298	295	0 - 2	0 - 2	2 - 6	8 - 9
9 - 20	8 - 19	5 - 12	5%	14%					Negligible		299	312	307	0 - 2	0 - 2	2 - 6	7 - 10
8 - 20	7 - 19	5 - 12	4%	9%					Negligible		309	326	319	0 - 2	0 - 2	1 - 6	6 - 10
7 - 21	6 - 20	4 - 13	2%	5%					Negligible		318	339	331	0 - 2	0 - 2	1 - 6	6 - 11
6 - 22	5 - 21	3 - 14	1%	2%					Negligible		325	349	341	0 - 2	0 - 2	1 - 7	5 - 11
5 - 23	4 - 22	3 - 14	1%	1%					Negligible		333	357	350	0 - 2	0 - 2	1 - 7	4 - 12
4 - 24	3 - 23	2 - 15	0%	0%					Negligible		339	362	357	0 - 2	0 - 2	1 - 7	3 - 13
3 - 25	2 - 24	1 - 16	0%	0%					Negligible		344	364	362	0 - 2	0 - 2	1 - 6	2 - 15
2 - 26	1 - 25	1 - 16	0%	0%					Negligible		358	365	365	0 - 3	0 - 1	1 - 7	1 - 15
Total		8 - 9	100%			0%		15	Negligible		249	241	245	0 - 2	0 - 2	3 - 5	11 - 7

Projected Unified Athletic Finish

	Wins Chance			Champ	Co-Champions					Finishing Place (Percent of all possible outcomes)
	Indiv.	Cumul.			0	1	2	3+		1st	2nd	3rd	4th	5th	6th	7th	8th	9th	10th		Total
16-0	0%	100%		100%	100%					0											0
15-1	1%	100%		99%	97%	2%				1	0										1
14-2	2%	99%		94%	82%	12%				1	0										2
13-3	3%	98%		86%	63%	22%	2%			3	0	0									3
12-4	6%	95%		56%	27%	24%	5%	0%		3	2	0	0								6
11-5	9%	89%		24%	5%	11%	6%	2%		2	5	2	0	0							9
10-6	12%	79%		3%	0%	1%	1%	1%		0	4	6	2	0							12
9-7	14%	67%		0%						0	1	4	7	3	0						14
8-8	15%	53%										0	4	7	3	0	0				15
7-9	14%	39%										0	0	3	6	4	0	0			14
6-10	11%	25%												0	2	5	3	0			11
5-11	7%	14%													0	2	4	2			7
4-12	4%	7%														0	2	2	0		4
3-13	2%	3%														0	0	2	0		2
2-14	1%	1%															0	1	0		1
1-15	0%	0%																0	0		0
0-16	0%	0%																	0		0
Total	100%			11%	6%	3%	1%	0%		11	12	12	13	13	12	11	9	6	0		100

Game Detail
Grades are adjusted for opponent strength in each category. Game stats are not adjusted for oppoent strength. See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.

			Offense																						Defense
			Tot Off		First Field Goal Attempt										Second Chance				TOs		Freethrows				Tot Def		First Field Goal Attempt										Second Chance				TOs		Freethrows
					Shot Accuracy				Shot Selection				Pts Per Shot														Shot Accuracy				Shot Selection				Pts Per Shot
					2 C	2 L	3	Tot	2 C	2 L	3	Tot			Off Reb	PPP	Tot				Att	Perc	Tot				2 C	2 L	3	Tot	2 C	2 L	3	Tot			Off Reb	PPP	Tot				Att	Perc	Tot
Season Ratings			C-		C-	C+	C	C-	44%	36%	40%	B	C		D+	C+	C-		C-		C+	C	C		D+		C-	D+	C	C-	41%	12%	47%	D-	D+		C	B-	B-		D		C	C	C
			1.05		55%	37%	32%	-1				+1	0.99		27%	1.0	.28		19%		.32	69%	.22		1.13		59%	40%	33%	+1				+1	1.04		30%	0.9	.28		15%		.32	69%	.22
Nov 2	UC Davis	C-	B-	A+	A	A	40%	7%	53%	B	A	F+	F	F+	F	A+	B-	A+	B+	C+	C	D	C-	44%	12%	44%	F	D+	C-	A+	A-	C	F	C+	F
		1.04	61%	67%	42%	+11				+2	1.24	22%	0.7	.15	25%	.49	75%	.37	0.99	55%	33%	36%	+1				+2	1.04	26%	0.5	.13	20%	.49	70%	.35
Nov 9	Oklahoma	B-	B+	D	C-	B	43%	9%	49%	A-	B+	D-	A+	C+	C	B-	B+	B	C-	F	F	C	D-	24%	2%	73%	D	D-	A	A+	A+	F	F	C+	F
		1.08	65%	25%	30%	+1				+2	1.04	26%	1.5	.39	19%	.30	75%	.22	1.21	83%	100%	33%	+8				+1	1.18	27%	0.5	.14	9%	.44	67%	.30
Nov 13	Miami FL	0.87	50%	24%	32%	-6	38%	24%	38%	0	0.86	19%	1.0	.18	20%	.28	61%	.17	1.24	66%	58%	33%	+8	51%	11%	39%	+2	1.18	39%	0.5	.40	14%	.32	73%	.23
			9-18	3-11	6-18							6 rb		6 pt	14 to			10-17		17-25	3-5	6-19							10 rb		11 pt	9 to			16-22
Nov 24	Alabama A&M	1.09	57%	32%	37%	+3	46%	13%	41%	+2	1.06	31%	1.1	.34	18%	.35	72%	.25	0.98	52%	30%	30%	-4	38%	18%	44%	0	0.90	25%	1.3	.23	16%	.36	70%	.25
			12-21	2-6	7-18							8 rb		9 pt	12 to			16-22		9-17	2-8	6-20							8 rb		7 pt	10 to			16-23
Dec 1	DePaul	0.90	51%	31%	30%	-4	41%	21%	39%	0	0.89	23%	0.9	.20	21%	.30	66%	.19	1.16	66%	36%	34%	+5	36%	8%	56%	+2	1.10	31%	0.7	.35	14%	.34	73%	.25
			10-19	3-9	5-18							7 rb		6 pt	14 to			12-18		11-17	1-4	9-27							9 rb		10 pt	10 to			16-22
Dec 6	Charlotte	0.97	52%	29%	30%	-4	43%	19%	39%	+1	0.91	24%	1.0	.25	17%	.32	65%	.21	1.15	64%	42%	39%	+9	41%	7%	52%	+2	1.19	31%	0.9	.23	17%	.34	68%	.23
			10-19	2-8	5-17							7 rb		8 pt	11 to			13-20		12-18	1-3	9-23							8 rb		6 pt	11 to			14-21
Dec 9	TN Martin	1.06	60%	40%	31%	+1	38%	18%	44%	0	1.01	30%	0.9	.27	18%	.38	70%	.27	0.99	61%	33%	31%	0	33%	11%	56%	+1	0.99	33%	0.8	.24	20%	.31	59%	.18
			10-16	3-8	6-19							8 rb		8 pt	11 to			17-24		9-15	2-5	7-24							10 rb		7 pt	13 to			11-19
Dec 15	Morehead	1.08	55%	30%	32%	-1	43%	13%	45%	+1	0.97	33%	1.1	.36	16%	.31	67%	.21	1.04	60%	41%	30%	+1	37%	23%	40%	0	0.99	30%	1.3	.23	14%	.26	73%	.19
			11-20	2-6	7-21							10 rb		11 pt	10 to			14-20		11-18	5-11	6-20							9 rb		7 pt	9 to			13-17
Dec 19	Queens	1.11	60%	39%	41%	+7	47%	11%	42%	+2	1.16	32%	1.0	.32	19%	.31	66%	.20	1.12	61%	67%	32%	+3	49%	4%	48%	+3	1.10	29%	1.1	.25	14%	.32	67%	.22
			14-23	2-5	8-21							9 rb		9 pt	14 to			14-21		16-25	1-2	8-25							9 rb		8 pt	10 to			15-23
Dec 21	West Florida	1.12	62%	41%	34%	+4	42%	14%	44%	+1	1.08	28%	1.1	.31	17%	.33	81%	.27	0.95	51%	23%	28%	-7	41%	15%	44%	+1	0.85	28%	1.0	.22	15%	.32	66%	.21
			12-20	3-7	7-21							8 rb		9 pt	11 to			17-21		10-20	2-8	6-21							10 rb		8 pt	10 to			14-21
Dec 31	Bellarmine	1.08	60%	30%	35%	+3	40%	11%	50%	+2	1.07	33%	1.1	.37	20%	.34	69%	.24	1.10	66%	47%	31%	+5	49%	5%	46%	+3	1.13	24%	1.8	.25	15%	.29	74%	.22
			10-17	1-5	8-22							9 rb		10 pt	13 to			15-21		16-24	1-2	7-22							6 rb		7 pt	10 to			13-18
Jan 2	Lipscomb	1.02	56%	35%	33%	+1	48%	16%	36%	+1	1.01	28%	1.0	.29	17%	.26	64%	.17	1.09	64%	65%	32%	+4	43%	4%	53%	+3	1.11	26%	1.3	.23	15%	.27	79%	.22
			14-25	3-8	6-18							9 rb		9 pt	12 to			11-17		15-23	1-2	9-28							8 rb		7 pt	11 to			15-19
Jan 6	W. Georgia	1.02	61%	39%	26%	-1	50%	12%	38%	+2	1.00	23%	1.2	.27	16%	.35	73%	.26	1.02	54%	38%	29%	-2	35%	23%	42%	-1	0.91	31%	0.7	.30	15%	.25	70%	.17
			15-24	2-6	5-18							7 rb		8 pt	11 to			17-23		10-18	5-12	6-22							10 rb		10 pt	10 to			12-17
Jan 9	Austin Peay	1.03	60%	42%	31%	+2	49%	12%	39%	+2	1.06	28%	0.9	.26	20%	.33	67%	.22	1.04	55%	33%	30%	-2	44%	11%	44%	+2	0.96	26%	1.0	.26	14%	.32	69%	.22
			14-23	2-6	6-18							8 rb		7 pt	14 to			14-21		12-22	2-6	7-22							9 rb		8 pt	10 to			15-22
Jan 16	E. Kentucky	1.04	55%	46%	33%	+2	43%	17%	40%	+1	1.03	28%	1.0	.28	18%	.35	66%	.23	1.06	54%	39%	33%	+1	26%	15%	59%	0	0.99	31%	0.8	.31	16%	.28	67%	.18
			11-20	4-8	6-19							8 rb		8 pt	12 to			15-22		7-13	3-7	10-29							10 rb		10 pt	10 to			12-19
Jan 20	Abilene Chr	1.06	60%	40%	39%	+6	53%	10%	37%	+2	1.14	25%	1.2	.29	23%	.43	67%	.29	1.00	54%	43%	30%	-1	46%	13%	41%	+2	0.98	30%	0.8	.25	18%	.31	65%	.21
			13-22	2-4	6-16							6 rb		7 pt	16 to			17-25		12-22	3-6	6-19							9 rb		8 pt	12 to			13-20
Jan 23	UT Arlington	1.02	53%	46%	30%	0	44%	21%	35%	0	0.98	27%	1.1	.29	18%	.36	69%	.25	1.01	52%	35%	32%	-2	50%	7%	43%	+3	0.98	32%	0.9	.26	18%	.34	65%	.22
			11-21	5-10	5-17							8 rb		9 pt	13 to			16-24		12-24	1-4	7-21							10 rb		8 pt	13 to			15-23
Jan 27	C. Arkansas	0.98	59%	22%	30%	-1	41%	8%	51%	+2	0.99	27%	1.0	.26	21%	.28	66%	.19	1.10	65%	22%	34%	+4	37%	4%	58%	+2	1.09	27%	1.1	.25	15%	.29	69%	.20
			11-19	1-4	7-24							8 rb		8 pt	14 to			12-18		12-19	0-2	10-29							8 rb		8 pt	10 to			13-19
Jan 30	Little Rock	1.03	57%	20%	35%	+1	44%	12%	45%	+2	1.02	31%	1.0	.32	21%	.37	66%	.24	1.10	61%	36%	36%	+4	40%	21%	39%	0	1.06	35%	1.0	.29	16%	.27	75%	.20
			11-19	1-5	7-19							9 rb		9 pt	14 to			15-23		12-20	4-10	7-19							10 rb		8 pt	10 to			13-18
Feb 3	W. Georgia	1.07	62%	44%	28%	+2	50%	12%	38%	+2	1.05	24%	1.2	.30	16%	.35	75%	.26	0.97	51%	35%	28%	-5	35%	23%	42%	-1	0.87	30%	0.8	.28	16%	.25	67%	.17
			15-24	3-6	5-19							7 rb		8 pt	11 to			17-23		9-18	4-12	6-22							10 rb		10 pt	11 to			11-17
				Shot Accuracy				Shot Selection				PPS	2nd Chance			TOs	Freethrows				Shot Accuracy				Shot Selection				PPS	2nd Chance			TOs	Freethrows
Feb 6	E. Kentucky	1.09	57%	49%	35%	+5	43%	17%	40%	+1	1.08	29%	1.1	.30	17%	.35	68%	.24	1.02	51%	35%	32%	-2	26%	15%	59%	0	0.94	29%	0.9	.28	16%	.28	64%	.18
			11-20	4-8	7-19							8 rb		9 pt	12 to			15-22		7-13	2-7	9-29							10 rb		10 pt	11 to			12-18
Feb 10	Tarleton St	1.01	50%	37%	34%	-1	44%	12%	44%	+2	0.98	31%	1.0	.31	23%	.44	72%	.31	1.10	56%	41%	35%	+3	44%	17%	38%	+1	1.04	32%	1.0	.33	17%	.37	72%	.27
			9-19	2-5	6-19							9 rb		9 pt	16 to			20-28		12-21	3-8	6-18							9 rb		10 pt	12 to			18-25
Feb 13	Little Rock	1.08	59%	25%	37%	+3	44%	12%	45%	+2	1.07	32%	1.1	.34	21%	.37	68%	.25	1.05	59%	33%	34%	+2	40%	21%	39%	0	1.01	34%	1.0	.27	16%	.27	72%	.19
			11-19	1-5	7-19							9 rb		9 pt	14 to			15-23		12-19	3-10	6-19							10 rb		8 pt	11 to			13-18
Feb 17	Abilene Chr	1.01	58%	34%	37%	+4	53%	10%	37%	+2	1.09	24%	1.1	.26	24%	.43	65%	.28	1.05	56%	47%	32%	+2	46%	13%	41%	+2	1.03	31%	0.7	.28	18%	.31	68%	.21
			13-22	1-4	6-16							6 rb		7 pt	16 to			16-25		12-22	3-6	6-19							9 rb		8 pt	12 to			14-20
Feb 20	UT Arlington	0.98	51%	43%	29%	-3	44%	21%	35%	0	0.93	26%	1.0	.27	19%	.36	67%	.24	1.05	54%	43%	34%	0	50%	7%	43%	+3	1.03	33%	0.9	.28	18%	.34	67%	.23
			11-21	4-10	5-17							8 rb		9 pt	13 to			16-24		13-24	2-4	7-21							10 rb		9 pt	13 to			16-24
Feb 24	C. Arkansas	1.03	61%	31%	32%	+1	41%	8%	51%	+2	1.04	28%	1.0	.29	21%	.28	69%	.19	1.06	62%	8%	33%	+1	37%	4%	58%	+2	1.04	26%	1.1	.22	16%	.29	67%	.19
			12-19	1-4	8-24							8 rb		8 pt	14 to			12-18		12-18	0-2	9-29							8 rb		7 pt	11 to			13-19
Feb 27	Austin Peay	0.99	58%	37%	30%	0	49%	12%	39%	+2	1.01	27%	0.9	.24	21%	.33	65%	.21	1.09	57%	38%	32%	0	44%	11%	44%	+2	1.01	27%	1.0	.28	13%	.32	71%	.23
			13-23	2-5	5-18							8 rb		7 pt	14 to			13-21		13-23	2-6	7-23							9 rb		9 pt	9 to			16-22
Mar 6	Tarleton St	1.05	52%	42%	36%	+1	44%	12%	44%	+2	1.03	32%	1.0	.33	23%	.44	74%	.32	1.05	54%	38%	33%	0	44%	17%	38%	+1	0.99	31%	1.1	.31	18%	.37	70%	.26
			10-19	2-5	7-19							9 rb		9 pt	16 to			20-28		11-21	3-8	6-18							9 rb		9 pt	12 to			17-25