Arkansas Pine Bluff
Southwestern Athletic
2019-20 - 2025-26 - 2026-27
Switch to All-time Team Page
All team stats adjusted for opponents. See methodology page for details.

Predictive Rating -10.3 324
Results Rating -9.0 309
Consistency 0.17 292
Pace 72.8 65
Improvement +0.9 153

Overall 1st FGA Second Chance TOs Free
throws
Shot Selection
Offense D+ 298 C- D- D+ C+ D+
Defense D 318 C- F+ C- F+ D+

Offense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 37% 220 C- 56% 216 -1.4 238
2 Pt. Jumpers 41% 139 C- 36% 247 +1.2 111
Three Pointers 38% 248 C 34% 194 -1.9 247
Shot Selection/Accuracy D+ -0.7 281 C- -1.4 224
1st FG Attempt C- 0.98 242
Second Chance D 25.2% 322 D- 0.89 344 D- 0.22 346
Opponents' Steals D+ 10.6% 292
Other Turnovers C- 7.7% 249
Turnovers D+ 18.3% 284
Freethrows C 0.30 182 B- 75% 102 C+ 0.23 146
Total Offense D+ -4.9 298

Assists Opponents' Blocks
Close Shots C 47% 206 C+ 10.2% 135
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots B 34% 61 B- 3.8% 91
Three Pointers C+ 85% 161 C+ 0.6% 122
Total C 56% 175 C+ 5.0% 114


Defense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 41% 123 D+ 61% 270 +2.6 269
2 Pt. Jumpers 17% 291 D+ 40% 268 -1.0 110
Three Pointers 42% 131 C+ 33% 157 +0.3 195
Shot Selection/Accuracy D+ +0.6 282 C- +1.3 233
1st FG Attempt C- 1.06 245
Second Chance D- 35.5% 342 D 1.13 308 F+ 0.40 348
Turnovers from Steals C 9.3% 195
Other Turnovers D 6.4% 302
Turnovers C- 15.7% 238
Freethrows D- 0.37 339 D- 76% 337 F+ 0.28 350
Total Defense D -5.4 318

Assists Blocks
Close Shots D- 57% 338 C- 10.2% 201
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots C 27% 228 C- 3.7% 250
Three Pointers D+ 88% 297 C 0.8% 168
Total D 62% 316 C- 5.2% 204

Miscellaneous
Offense Defense
Possession Length 16.7 98 17.2 158
Fast Break Points Per Possession 0.14 245 0.12 38
Consistency 0.13 243 0.14 323
Improvement +0.3 168 +0.6 160

NCAA Tournament Selection
At-Large Selection Status Out of Consideration
Projected Seeding Not in Tournament  

Prediction Ranges
Pessimistic
5th Percentile
Expected
50th Percentile
Optimistic
95th Percentile
Predictive Rating Rank 331 324 314
Results Rating Rank 327 311 262
Conference Record 10 - 8 10 - 8 10 - 8
Conference Finish 4 4 4
NCAA Tourney Seed None None 16
NCAA Tourney Finish None None 1st Four

NowWin NextLose Next
#1 Overall Seed 0% 0% 0%
#1 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 2 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 4 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 6 Seed 0% 0% 0%
NCAA Tourney Bid 8% 14% 0%
At-Large Bid if not Auto Qualifier 0% 0% 0%
Average Seed 16.0 16.0 n/a
.500 or above 0% 0% 0%
.500 or above in Conference 100% 100% 100.0%
Conference Champion 0% 0% 0.0%
Last Place in Conference 0% 0% 0.0%
First Four8% 14% 0%
First Round4% 6% 0%
Second Round0% 0% 0%
Sweet Sixteen0% 0% 0%
Elite Eight0% 0% 0%
Final Four0% 0% 0%
Championship Game0% 0% 0%
National Champion0% 0% 0%

Projected Record by Quadrant
QuadProjectedProjected Cumulative
Quad 1a0 - 10 - 1
Quad 1b0 - 50 - 6
Quad 21 - 11 - 7
Quad 30 - 31 - 10
Quad 411 - 912 - 19


Date Opponent Result/Prediction Lead Record Total Rating Offense Defense
Avg Time Overall Conf Total First
FGA
2nd Chance TOs Total First
FGA
2nd Chance TOs
 Mon, Nov 3 49 @Washington L 50 - 94 2% -21  0% 0 - 1 F -30 F -20 F F F D- -7 C- F A-
 Thu, Nov 6 202 @Portland L 74 - 83 15% -10  4% 0 - 2 D -8 F -11 F C- F B +4 B- B- B+
 Sat, Nov 8 161 @Loyola Marymount L 72 - 94 11% -9  8% 0 - 3 F -19 C- -1 B- D+ D F -18 F C F
 Tue, Nov 11 43 @Oklahoma L 69 - 95 2% -9  6% 0 - 4 D -10 D+ -2 D+ C F F+ -8 C+ F C-
 Sat, Nov 15 18 @Vanderbilt L 75 - 104 1% -14  0% 0 - 5 D+ -8 B- +4 B- D B F -10 A- F F+
 Tue, Nov 18 41 @SMU L 60 - 106 2% -24  1% 0 - 6 F -30 F -19 D- F D- D -5 F+ A- C
 Thu, Nov 20 190 @Marshall L 70 - 98 14% -5  41% 0 - 7 F -27 F -14 F F+ F F -10 F A+ D-
 Sun, Nov 23 93 @Miami (OH) L 84 - 111 5% -16  9% 0 - 8 F -18 C- -1 F A- A- F -14 F C F+
 Wed, Dec 3 108 @Illinois-Chicago W 63 - 62 6% +5  86% 1 - 8 B- +8 F+ -9 C C- C- A+ +17 A+ B- A+
 Sat, Dec 6 90 @DePaul L 72 - 76 5% +1  51% 1 - 9 B- +5 C +1 A F D- B +5 A+ D F
 Wed, Dec 10 59 @Tulsa L 84 - 117 3% -16  6% 1 - 10 F -21 C+ +3 B+ C D- F -20 F F D+
 Sat, Jan 3 305 Alabama A&M W 95 - 83 56% +4  51% 2 - 10 1 - 0 C +0 A+ +22 A A+ C F -20 C F C-
 Mon, Jan 5 318 Alabama St. W 90 - 79 59% +6  86% 3 - 10 2 - 0 C -2 B- +4 B- D+ F+ D- -7 D+ C D-
 Sat, Jan 10 308 @Texas Southern W 74 - 66 34% +8  85% 4 - 10 3 - 0 C+ +2 D+ -3 B- F B- B +5 A C D+
 Mon, Jan 12 320 @Prairie View L 61 - 73 37% -6  10% 4 - 11 3 - 1 F -19 F -16 F F D C- -3 D- C F
 Sat, Jan 17 315 Florida A&M L 67 - 71 58% -1  27% 4 - 12 3 - 2 F+ -16 D- -8 F+ B D F+ -9 F F A-
 Mon, Jan 19 239 Bethune-Cookman L 82 - 87 OT 40% +2  52% 4 - 13 3 - 3 D- -13 D -5 B- F+ F D- -7 B F B+
 Sat, Jan 24 276 @Southern W 75 - 74 25% -2  21% 5 - 13 4 - 3 C- -2 C- -1 D- C- C+ C -1 B F B
 Sat, Jan 31 365 @Mississippi Valley W 78 - 70 80% +7  91% 6 - 13 5 - 3 D -11 D -6 F+ F B- D -5 D- D- C
 Wed, Feb 4 307 @Grambling St. W 67 - 64 34% +4  75% 7 - 13 6 - 3 C- -3 D -4 F B- C C+ +1 B+ D- D-
 Sat, Feb 7 354 Alcorn St. W 84 - 77 77% +10  99% 8 - 13 7 - 3 D -11 B +6 A C+ F F -16 F F+ F+
 Mon, Feb 9 346 Jackson St. W 84 - 63 72% +10  82% 9 - 13 8 - 3 C+ +5 B- +5 A- F+ A C+ +1 A F C
 Sat, Feb 14 318 @Alabama St. L 61 - 79 36% -7  9% 9 - 14 8 - 4 F -25 F -18 D F F D -6 F+ B- D
 Mon, Feb 16 305 @Alabama A&M L 70 - 82 33% -4  11% 9 - 15 8 - 5 F+ -18 C- -2 D- D- A F -17 F F+ C-
 Thu, Feb 19 308 Texas Southern L 64 - 83 57% -2  34% 9 - 16 8 - 6 F -31 F -15 D F D F -16 F F F
 Sat, Feb 21 320 Prairie View W 84 - 82 60% +3  72% 10 - 16 9 - 6 D -11 B +6 A- C- B+ F -17 D F A
 Sat, Feb 28 365 Mississippi Valley L 69 - 70 91% +2  55% 10 - 17 9 - 7 F -26 F -16 F F C- F -10 F F B+
 Tue, Mar 3 346 @Jackson St. L 78 - 81 50% -1  30% 10 - 18 9 - 8 D- -13 D+ -3 C+ F F F -10 D- F F+
 Thu, Mar 5 354 @Alcorn St. W 83 - 48 56% +17  91% 11 - 18 10 - 8 A +23 C- -2 C- F A+ A+ +23 A+ B- A-
 Thu, Mar 12 276 Southern L 78 - 82 35%
Totals 11 - 19 10 - 8 -10 D+ -5 F C- D+ D -5 C B- C+



Game Detail
Grades are adjusted for opponent strength in each category. Game stats are not adjusted for oppoent strength. See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.
Offense Defense
Tot Off First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows Tot Def First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot
2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot
Season Ratings D+ C- C- C C- 37% 41% 38% D+ C- D D- D- D+ C B- C+ D D+ D+ C+ C- 41% 17% 42% D+ C- D- D F+ C- D- D- F+
1.02 56% 36% 34% -1 -1 0.98 25% 0.9 .22 18% .30 75% .23 1.16 61% 40% 33% +1 +1 1.06 36% 1.1 .40 16% .37 76% .23
Nov
3
Washington F F F D- F 20% 33% 46% D- F B F F F D D+ D D- F+ A+ F C- 29% 21% 50% D+ C- F B- F A- F B- F
0.68 45% 17% 28% -14 -3 0.69 31% 0.4 .12 22% .21 67% .14 1.28 71% 20% 42% +6 -1 1.13 52% 1.1 .55 19% .56 73% .41
Nov
6
Portland F D- F D- F 36% 18% 46% C F F+ A+ C- F A+ A+ A+ B D- D+ A+ B 42% 9% 49% F B- A- D B- B+ F D F
0.90 50% 11% 30% -10 0 0.82 24% 1.3 .32 23% .43 89% .38 1.01 68% 40% 23% -4 +2 0.98 23% 1.3 .29 23% .50 78% .39
Nov
8
Loyola Marymount C- B+ C D+ B 40% 30% 30% C- B- C+ F D+ D F A+ D+ F F A+ F F 23% 11% 66% F+ F D B+ C F F A+ F
1.02 62% 38% 31% 0 -1 1.00 33% 0.8 .28 18% .19 100% .19 1.33 83% 0% 49% +16 0 1.34 31% 0.9 .28 8% .43 57% .25
Nov
11
Oklahoma D+ D+ D- C- D+ 31% 30% 39% D+ D+ B F+ C F C A B- F+ C C+ D+ B- 38% 10% 52% F+ C+ F D+ F C- F+ C F+
0.99 53% 31% 33% -4 -2 0.91 36% 0.9 .31 22% .27 80% .22 1.36 60% 40% 37% +3 +1 1.12 53% 1.3 .69 13% .39 75% .30
Nov
15
Vanderbilt B- F C+ A+ B 31% 25% 43% C- B- D D D B A C- A- F C- C+ B+ A 34% 14% 52% C- A- F F F F+ F B- F
1.01 38% 38% 41% -2 -1 0.96 21% 0.9 .18 17% .42 73% .31 1.40 65% 38% 30% -1 +1 1.02 49% 1.5 .72 9% .49 76% .37
Nov
18
SMU F A+ F F F+ 39% 23% 39% B- D- D+ F F D- C+ F D D F D+ F F+ 36% 19% 46% D+ F+ A C+ A- C F D+ F
0.75 73% 15% 18% -9 0 0.84 26% 0.2 .04 21% .28 56% .16 1.32 76% 45% 44% +15 0 1.32 30% 1.0 .30 15% .38 77% .29
Nov
20
Marshall F B+ C- F F+ 17% 50% 33% F F F D+ F+ F A B+ A F F B F F 32% 26% 42% C F B- A+ A+ D- F+ F F
0.91 67% 35% 24% -5 -5 0.81 26% 0.9 .23 21% .43 77% .33 1.28 78% 33% 54% +18 -1 1.35 28% 0.6 .16 14% .32 81% .26
Nov
23
Miami (OH) C- F C F+ F 44% 21% 34% B- F D A+ A- A- A A+ A+ F D+ C F F 56% 9% 35% F F C- C C F+ F F F
1.03 41% 38% 29% -10 0 0.82 24% 1.6 .38 13% .35 84% .30 1.36 66% 40% 50% +13 +3 1.33 24% 1.1 .28 11% .44 88% .39
Dec
3
Illinois-Chicago F+ B- F C C- 46% 18% 36% B C D- B+ C- C- F F F A+ A+ B A+ A+ 61% 12% 27% F A+ D A B- A+ F+ C- F+
0.87 61% 11% 33% -4 +1 0.96 28% 1.1 .31 21% .21 50% .11 0.86 43% 33% 15% -17 +3 0.73 40% 0.8 .33 24% .40 73% .29
Dec
6
DePaul C C- A+ A+ A+ 31% 33% 35% D- A F D- F D- F A+ F B A- A A+ A+ 49% 16% 36% F+ A+ A- F D F F C- F
0.97 53% 56% 42% +8 -2 1.15 17% 0.8 .14 23% .12 86% .11 1.03 50% 29% 13% -17 +1 0.71 24% 1.7 .41 9% .61 71% .43
Dec
10
Tulsa C+ A+ C- F+ B+ 39% 17% 44% B- B+ C- B+ C D- A- A+ A+ F D+ B F F 49% 5% 45% D- F D- F F D+ F D- F
1.09 81% 33% 29% +5 +1 1.13 24% 1.3 .31 19% .34 86% .29 1.51 63% 33% 48% +12 +3 1.31 37% 1.8 .67 13% .55 84% .46
Jan
3
Alabama A&M A+ B- C+ A+ A+ 40% 27% 33% D- A A+ A- A+ C A+ A A+ F D+ B- A+ B- 44% 20% 36% F+ C F D F C- F F F
1.49 63% 38% 56% +13 -1 1.27 54% 1.2 .65 16% .48 81% .39 1.30 60% 33% 25% -5 +1 0.93 56% 1.1 .63 16% .52 82% .43
Jan
5
Alabama St. B- F A+ A+ B- 48% 16% 36% B- B- B F D+ F+ A+ A A+ D- C- B- C D+ 41% 27% 32% C+ D+ A- F C D- F D F
1.20 33% 71% 56% +6 +1 1.16 38% 0.8 .31 21% .70 83% .58 1.05 57% 33% 33% -2 -1 0.96 24% 1.1 .26 15% .41 73% .30
Jan
10
Texas Southern D+ A+ F B B- 44% 18% 38% C B- F F F B- F C- F B B C+ A+ A+ 52% 21% 27% F A C- C C D+ F C+ F
1.07 73% 22% 37% +5 +1 1.14 23% 0.9 .19 14% .27 69% .19 0.95 52% 36% 14% -12 +1 0.81 27% 1.0 .27 16% .39 70% .27
Jan
12
Prairie View F F F F+ F 35% 23% 42% D F D- F F D B+ F C- C- A F+ F F+ 33% 38% 29% B D- F A+ C F F A+ F+
0.88 41% 18% 30% -13 -1 0.75 30% 0.8 .25 20% .42 61% .25 1.05 44% 44% 43% +1 -3 1.00 31% 0.8 .26 10% .50 61% .30
Jan
17
Florida A&M D- B D- F D- 33% 28% 40% F+ F+ F A+ B D B- A B+ F+ F A+ C- F 38% 19% 43% D F F+ F F A- F C+ F
1.02 64% 33% 29% -2 -1 0.95 18% 2.0 .36 20% .36 84% .30 1.08 81% 13% 33% +4 0 1.10 34% 1.1 .38 24% .48 67% .32
Jan
19
Bethune-Cookman D C A+ C B 46% 24% 30% D B- F C- F+ F A+ D+ A+ D- B A+ A+ A 61% 13% 26% F B F F F B+ F D- F
1.04 57% 50% 33% +2 0 1.06 24% 1.1 .26 22% .48 70% .34 1.10 54% 17% 25% -9 +3 0.89 42% 1.3 .53 22% .66 73% .48
Jan
24
Southern C- F+ C C D- 31% 18% 51% C- D- F A+ C- C+ A+ D A C F D+ A+ B 30% 28% 41% B- B F F F B F F F
1.08 50% 38% 35% -2 0 0.98 19% 1.8 .34 17% .49 71% .35 1.07 71% 38% 16% -7 -2 0.85 42% 1.4 .58 19% .46 77% .36
Jan
31
Mississippi Valley D C- F A D- 37% 37% 26% F F+ F F+ F B- A+ D A+ D D+ F A+ F+ 38% 42% 20% C- D- A- F D- C F F F
1.10 59% 29% 42% 0 -2 0.98 26% 1.1 .29 15% .56 71% .40 0.98 59% 47% 22% +1 -3 0.98 17% 1.6 .28 21% .50 79% .39
Feb
4
Grambling St. D D+ F F+ F 39% 24% 37% D F D- A+ B- C B+ C- B C+ D F A+ A- 40% 19% 40% D+ B+ F B- D- D- B C B-
0.99 56% 27% 29% -6 0 0.89 26% 1.4 .38 19% .38 71% .27 0.95 62% 50% 10% -11 0 0.81 37% 0.9 .34 18% .27 73% .20
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows
Feb
7
Alcorn St. B D A A+ A 45% 14% 40% C A C- B+ C+ F A+ A- A+ F C C+ F F 40% 24% 36% C- F B F F+ F+ C+ F D+
1.27 58% 50% 53% +13 +1 1.31 36% 1.3 .48 23% .47 79% .37 1.16 55% 33% 50% +6 0 1.14 21% 1.5 .32 15% .23 85% .20
Feb
9
Jackson St. B- D A+ A+ A 37% 27% 37% D- A- D- F+ F+ A C+ A- B C+ A+ D A+ A- 18% 37% 45% A+ A F F F C C A+ B-
1.28 56% 54% 50% +12 -1 1.24 30% 0.9 .27 11% .36 81% .29 0.96 33% 42% 22% -11 -4 0.73 37% 1.3 .49 18% .28 67% .19
Feb
14
Alabama St. F B F C- D+ 29% 20% 51% D D F F F F A+ D+ A+ D D- D+ B D- 49% 19% 32% F+ F+ F A+ B- D F+ F F
0.84 67% 25% 33% -1 -1 1.00 23% 0.3 .07 30% .50 72% .36 1.09 62% 40% 29% 0 +1 1.04 41% 0.6 .23 15% .34 86% .29
Feb
16
Alabama A&M C- D F A D- 44% 18% 38% C D- B F D- A D B- D+ F D- B- F F 39% 22% 39% D F F+ D- F+ C- F F F
1.10 55% 11% 42% -2 +1 1.00 36% 0.7 .24 11% .28 75% .21 1.29 63% 33% 50% +10 0 1.22 30% 1.1 .35 16% .60 88% .52
Feb
19
Texas Southern F F+ C B- D+ 26% 21% 53% F+ D D- F F D A- F C+ F D+ F D F 33% 22% 45% C- F B F F F A+ F A
0.94 50% 40% 36% 0 -1 1.00 27% 0.4 .10 18% .43 63% .27 1.21 61% 58% 36% +7 -1 1.15 23% 1.7 .39 12% .15 89% .13
Feb
21
Prairie View B A+ A+ F+ A 39% 20% 41% C- A- F A+ C- B+ C- C+ C- F C- F A+ D 36% 30% 34% D+ D F F F A F F F
1.24 79% 60% 30% +10 0 1.22 24% 1.5 .36 15% .35 75% .26 1.21 56% 62% 20% -1 -1 0.98 37% 1.4 .52 21% .52 89% .46
Feb
28
Mississippi Valley F B+ D+ F F 28% 30% 41% F F D- F F C- A+ D- A- F C- F C+ F 33% 41% 27% C- F F C- F B+ C D+ C-
0.99 69% 36% 21% -6 -2 0.87 32% 1.0 .32 17% .52 70% .36 1.00 56% 55% 31% +5 -3 1.06 35% 0.9 .32 24% .28 73% .21
Mar
3
Jackson St. D+ C- B A+ B- 46% 21% 33% C C+ C+ F F F A+ A+ A+ F F A- C+ D- 30% 20% 50% D D- F B- F F+ F D F
1.13 59% 40% 44% +6 +1 1.15 38% 0.6 .24 23% .45 88% .39 1.17 67% 30% 32% -1 -1 1.00 41% 0.9 .38 14% .51 80% .40
Mar
5
Alcorn St. C- B+ F F C- 59% 16% 25% B- C- F F F A+ F B+ F A+ A+ C- A+ A+ 35% 35% 31% A- A+ A- D+ B- A- D- A+ C
1.12 69% 30% 27% +3 +2 1.11 16% 0.8 .13 12% .21 79% .17 0.65 41% 35% 13% -16 -2 0.65 20% 1.0 .20 23% .30 59% .17




Numbers in tables represent percent chance of outcome occurring.




Projected Southwestern Athletic Finish

0-18 1-17 2-16 3-15 4-14 5-13 6-12 7-11 8-10 9-9 10-8 11-7 12-6 13-5 14-4 15-3 16-2 17-1 18-0 Total
1st 1st
2nd 2nd
3rd 3rd
4th 100.0 100.0 4th
5th 5th
6th 6th
7th 7th
8th 8th
9th 9th
10th 10th
11th 11th
12th 12th
Total 100.0 Total



Southwestern Athletic Regular Season Championship

Record Champion Total Outright 2-Way 3-Way 4-Way 5-Way 6-Way 7-Way 8-Way
18-0
17-1
16-2
15-3
14-4
13-5
12-6
11-7
10-8 0.0%
9-9
Total



NCAA Tournament Selection

Conf RecordRecord ChanceTourney
Bid
AutoAt-LargeAvg
Seed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 No Bid At-Large if not Auto
18-0
17-1
16-2
15-3
14-4
13-5
12-6
11-7
10-8 100.0% 8.5% 8.5% 16.0 8.5 91.5
9-9
8-10
7-11
6-12
5-13
4-14
3-15
2-16
1-17
0-18
Total 100% 8.5% 8.5% 0.0% 16.0 91.5 0.0%


Best / Worst Case Scenarios

ChanceTourney
Bid
Avg
Seed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Win Out 8.5% 100.0% 16.0 100.0
Win Out, Lose in Conf. Tourney Championship 12.7%
Win Out, Lose in Conf. Tourney Semi-Final 39.5%
Lose Out 39.3%