Wichita St.
American Athletic
2019-20 - 2025-26 - 2026-27
Switch to All-time Team Page
All team stats adjusted for opponents. See methodology page for details.

Predictive Rating +7.3 82
Results Rating +6.3 90
Consistency 0.13 49
Pace 66.4 235
Improvement +0.7 159

Overall 1st FGA Second Chance TOs Free
throws
Shot Selection
Offense C+ 99 C- B+ B C C-
Defense B 65 B B C B- A

Offense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 40% 143 C- 55% 253 -0.3 193
2 Pt. Jumpers 41% 138 C 38% 161 +1.4 107
Three Pointers 36% 283 C- 33% 216 -2.8 277
Shot Selection/Accuracy C- -0.3 229 C- -1.4 227
1st FG Attempt C- 0.99 233
Second Chance A 39.3% 9 C 1.02 195 B+ 0.40 34
Opponents' Steals B- 8.3% 73
Other Turnovers B- 6.4% 86
Turnovers B 14.7% 68
Freethrows C+ 0.32 141 D 69% 286 C 0.22 188
Total Offense C+ +2.9 99

Assists Opponents' Blocks
Close Shots C- 44% 255 B 8.6% 54
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots D 16% 311 C- 6.1% 265
Three Pointers F 70% 359 C+ 0.7% 133
Total F+ 45% 347 C+ 5.1% 135


Defense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 35% 278 B- 55% 84 -3.1 78
2 Pt. Jumpers 31% 7 C 38% 190 +4.1 360
Three Pointers 33% 352 B 31% 64 -5.0 10
Shot Selection/Accuracy A -1.5 14 B- -2.4 81
1st FG Attempt B 0.94 49
Second Chance B- 27.7% 82 B 0.95 58 B 0.26 56
Turnovers from Steals C- 9.0% 204
Other Turnovers C 7.4% 150
Turnovers C 16.4% 195
Freethrows C+ 0.28 114 B+ 69% 25 B- 0.19 84
Total Defense B +4.4 65

Assists Blocks
Close Shots C- 51% 247 B- 13.6% 77
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots B+ 15% 11 B 7.1% 57
Three Pointers A+ 68% 3 D 0.2% 328
Total A- 45% 16 B- 7.1% 66

Miscellaneous
Offense Defense
Possession Length 17.6 215 17.5 224
Fast Break Points Per Possession 0.13 294 0.12 44
Consistency 0.12 148 0.12 177
Improvement -0.6 219 +1.3 125

NCAA Tournament Selection
At-Large Selection Status Out of Consideration
Projected Seeding Not in Tournament  

Prediction Ranges
Pessimistic
5th Percentile
Expected
50th Percentile
Optimistic
95th Percentile
Predictive Rating Rank 85 82 75
Results Rating Rank 92 92 74
Conference Record 13 - 5 13 - 5 13 - 5
Conference Finish 2 2 2
NCAA Tourney Seed None None 11
NCAA Tourney Finish None None 2nd Round

NowWin NextLose Next
#1 Overall Seed 0% 0% 0%
#1 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 2 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 4 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 6 Seed 0% 0% 0%
NCAA Tourney Bid 35% 100% 0%
At-Large Bid if not Auto Qualifier 0% n/a 0%
Average Seed 11.3 11.3 11.0
.500 or above 100% 100% 100%
.500 or above in Conference 100% 100% 100.0%
Conference Champion 0% 0% 0.0%
Last Place in Conference 0% 0% 0.0%
First Four0% 0% 0%
First Round35% 100% 0%
Second Round5% 15% 0%
Sweet Sixteen1% 2% 0%
Elite Eight0% 0% 0%
Final Four0% 0% 0%
Championship Game0% 0% 0%
National Champion0% 0% 0%

Projected Record by Quadrant
QuadProjectedProjected Cumulative
Quad 1a0 - 10 - 1
Quad 1b2 - 32 - 4
Quad 24 - 36 - 7
Quad 34 - 310 - 10
Quad 411 - 121 - 11


Date Opponent Result/Prediction Lead Record Total Rating Offense Defense
Avg Time Overall Conf Total First
FGA
2nd Chance TOs Total First
FGA
2nd Chance TOs
 Tue, Nov 4 236 UNC Asheville W 75 - 58 91% +4  72% 1 - 0 B +9 C- -1 F A+ F A +11 A+ F A+
 Sat, Nov 8 299 Prairie View W 105 - 62 95% +18  99% 2 - 0 A+ +32 A+ +16 A B- A A+ +11 A+ F A+
 Thu, Nov 13 246 Loyola Chicago W 95 - 74 92% +14  90% 3 - 0 B+ +13 A+ +24 B- A+ A+ F+ -9 F+ A+ D
 Tue, Nov 18 65 @Boise St. L 59 - 62 32% -4  23% 3 - 1 B +9 D -6 F A- D A+ +15 A+ B C
 Sat, Nov 22 270 Wisconsin-Milwaukee W 75 - 58 93% +1  56% 4 - 1 B- +8 D+ -3 D- D A A+ +11 A C+ C+
 Wed, Nov 26 30 St. Mary's L 65 - 70 24% -3  19% 4 - 2 B +10 C- -1 D+ C+ F+ A +11 A+ A- D-
 Thu, Nov 27 89 Colorado St. L 70 - 76 54% -10  0% 4 - 3 C +0 B+ +8 F A+ B F+ -9 F A+ C-
 Fri, Nov 28 163 Western Kentucky L 70 - 75 75% -1  31% 4 - 4 C- -5 C+ +2 D+ C A- D- -8 D B D-
 Sat, Dec 6 81 @Northern Iowa W 74 - 69 OT 38% +2  55% 5 - 4 A- +15 B +6 A- B+ D+ A +9 B A+ D-
 Sat, Dec 13 93 DePaul L 58 - 61 67% -1  30% 5 - 5 C -0 D -6 D C B+ B+ +5 F A+ A+
 Wed, Dec 17 243 Wofford W 84 - 73 92% +7  99% 6 - 5 C+ +3 B +7 B- B- B+ D+ -4 B- F+ C-
 Sun, Dec 21 297 Eastern Kentucky W 88 - 57 95% +22  95% 7 - 5 A +20 B +7 C- A+ A A+ +14 A A+ F+
 Wed, Dec 31 124 @UAB W 75 - 70 57% -6  9% 8 - 5 1 - 0 B +11 B+ +9 C+ A+ C- B- +2 B- C C-
 Sat, Jan 3 172 @Charlotte L 100 - 104 2OT 68% +4  67% 8 - 6 1 - 1 C -2 A+ +16 B- A+ C- F -18 B- F F
 Wed, Jan 7 224 Rice L 64 - 66 90% -2  36% 8 - 7 1 - 2 D -9 F -11 F F+ A B- +2 D+ A+ D
 Sun, Jan 11 135 North Texas W 78 - 67 79% +8  91% 9 - 7 2 - 2 B +10 B- +6 A B- F+ B +4 A D+ C
 Thu, Jan 15 128 @Florida Atlantic L 67 - 85 58% -15  0% 9 - 8 2 - 3 D- -13 D -5 F B- C- F+ -8 F A+ C-
 Sun, Jan 18 51 @South Florida W 86 - 85 OT 25% +1  43% 10 - 8 3 - 3 A- +15 A- +10 B C+ A+ B +5 B A+ C-
 Wed, Jan 21 234 East Carolina W 77 - 60 91% +14  99% 11 - 8 4 - 3 B +9 B- +5 F A+ A B+ +6 A A+ F
 Sat, Jan 24 129 Memphis W 74 - 59 78% +13  92% 12 - 8 5 - 3 B+ +14 C- -2 B- B- B A+ +16 A+ B- A
 Sun, Feb 1 70 @Tulsa L 83 - 93 34% -6  13% 12 - 9 5 - 4 C +2 B +7 F A+ A+ D -5 D- F C+
 Wed, Feb 4 172 Charlotte W 74 - 64 84% +5  83% 13 - 9 6 - 4 B- +6 D+ -2 B D A+ A +9 B A+ A
 Sun, Feb 8 204 @Tulane W 75 - 61 74% +6  77% 14 - 9 7 - 4 B+ +15 D+ -3 B- F+ F+ A+ +17 A A+ A
 Wed, Feb 11 51 South Florida L 58 - 66 46% +2  70% 14 - 10 7 - 5 C +0 F -13 F D- C+ A+ +13 B- B A+
 Sat, Feb 14 70 Tulsa W 81 - 77 57% -3  7% 15 - 10 8 - 5 B +10 B +7 B- C A+ B- +3 A A+ D+
 Wed, Feb 18 234 @East Carolina W 92 - 89 2OT 80% -1  26% 16 - 10 9 - 5 C +1 C- -2 C- D- C B- +3 D+ A+ F
 Sat, Feb 21 151 Temple W 69 - 57 82% +5  70% 17 - 10 10 - 5 B +10 C +1 D+ B+ D A +10 A+ D D
 Thu, Feb 26 129 @Memphis W 88 - 82 58% +3  79% 18 - 10 11 - 5 B +11 A+ +15 C- A A+ D+ -4 F+ A+ F
 Sun, Mar 1 335 @Texas San Antonio W 84 - 67 93% +9  92% 19 - 10 12 - 5 B- +8 B- +5 F A C+ B- +3 A+ F F
 Sat, Mar 7 128 Florida Atlantic W 88 - 70 78% +3  49% 20 - 10 13 - 5 A- +17 A +13 C+ A+ A B +4 C+ A+ A-
 Sat, Mar 14 70 Tulsa W 81 - 68 45% +7  86% 21 - 10 A +22 A +13 A- A- C+ A +10 A+ B C-
 Sun, Mar 15 51 South Florida L 75 - 79 35%
Totals 21 - 11 13 - 5 +7 C+ +3 A+ C- C- B +4 C- D C



Game Detail
Grades are adjusted for opponent strength in each category. Game stats are not adjusted for oppoent strength. See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.
Offense Defense
Tot Off First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows Tot Def First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot
2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot
Season Ratings C+ C- C C- C- 40% 41% 36% C- C- A C B+ B C+ D C B B- C B B- 35% 31% 33% A B B- B B C C+ B+ B-
1.13 55% 38% 33% -1 0 0.99 39% 1.0 .40 15% .32 69% .22 1.02 55% 38% 31% -2 -2 0.94 28% 0.9 .26 16% .28 69% .22
Nov
4
UNC Asheville C- F A D F 45% 29% 27% D- F A+ A+ A+ F D F D- A A+ C A- A- 13% 58% 29% A+ A+ C- F F A+ A A A
1.11 36% 50% 31% -8 -1 0.86 51% 1.3 .66 21% .28 60% .17 0.86 33% 39% 29% -5 -7 0.79 31% 1.5 .47 24% .25 62% .15
Nov
8
Prairie View A+ C+ A+ A+ A 42% 13% 44% B- A B C- B- A A+ B- A+ A+ A A+ A+ A+ 27% 46% 27% A+ A+ D F F A+ F D F
1.37 59% 57% 43% +9 +1 1.23 41% 1.1 .44 13% .61 76% .46 0.81 43% 25% 7% -21 -4 0.52 28% 1.4 .40 22% .47 79% .37
Nov
13
Loyola Chicago A+ C- F A+ B- 33% 18% 49% C B- A- A+ A+ A+ C+ F C- F+ D A+ F F 40% 17% 44% B F+ D+ A+ A+ D D+ F F
1.46 53% 10% 46% +2 0 1.07 37% 1.6 .58 3% .30 68% .21 1.13 63% 13% 48% +7 +1 1.17 32% 0.5 .15 17% .33 83% .28
Nov
18
Boise St. D F B+ F+ F 40% 29% 31% C F A+ F A- D A+ C- A A+ A+ A+ F+ A+ 44% 22% 33% B- A+ A- C- B C F+ A+ C
0.92 33% 46% 29% -10 -1 0.80 36% 0.9 .33 17% .36 68% .25 0.97 40% 10% 40% -11 0 0.80 30% 1.1 .32 16% .43 65% .28
Nov
22
Wisconsin-Milwaukee D+ F A A D- 45% 24% 31% D+ D- B+ F D A A+ F+ A A+ C+ A+ A A 30% 32% 38% A A B+ D C+ C+ D+ B+ C
1.12 41% 50% 40% -2 0 0.98 36% 0.8 .28 12% .47 68% .32 0.87 53% 25% 26% -10 -2 0.78 26% 1.2 .31 16% .29 63% .18
Nov
26
St. Mary's C- D- D D+ D+ 48% 26% 26% C+ D+ B- C- C+ F+ A+ A A+ A B D- A+ A+ 43% 29% 29% B A+ A C+ A- D- F D F
0.95 46% 31% 31% -9 0 0.84 26% 0.9 .23 19% .34 79% .27 1.02 52% 43% 7% -13 -1 0.76 31% 1.1 .33 13% .44 85% .37
Nov
27
Colorado St. B+ D+ A F F 41% 18% 41% B F A+ A+ A+ B C F D+ F+ F F F F 30% 13% 57% C+ F C- A+ A+ C- A+ A+ A+
1.19 56% 50% 11% -13 +1 0.77 54% 1.4 .76 14% .30 60% .18 1.30 71% 100% 46% +22 0 1.48 32% 0.6 .18 17% .23 55% .12
Nov
28
Western Kentucky C+ D D+ B C- 31% 29% 40% D D+ A+ F C A- A A+ A+ D- A F F D- 40% 29% 31% A- D C- A B D- F D F
1.10 53% 36% 37% 0 -2 0.98 40% 0.7 .28 14% .48 81% .38 1.18 42% 50% 40% 0 -1 1.00 32% 0.8 .26 11% .41 78% .32
Dec
6
Northern Iowa B A- F A A 35% 22% 43% C- A- B+ B- B+ D+ B B B+ A B F A+ A- 58% 17% 25% F+ B C A+ A+ D- F A+ D+
1.05 65% 27% 38% +3 0 1.06 32% 1.0 .32 20% .30 76% .23 0.98 55% 56% 23% -3 +2 1.00 22% 0.5 .11 11% .35 55% .19
Dec
13
DePaul D D- F D F+ 50% 19% 31% A- D A F C B+ A+ F B- B+ C F F F 40% 21% 38% C F A- A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ A+
0.92 48% 25% 31% -9 +1 0.86 39% 0.7 .26 17% .54 46% .25 0.97 59% 56% 44% +10 0 1.21 25% 0.7 .17 29% .22 60% .13
Dec
17
Wofford B A B+ D+ B 42% 24% 33% D- B- B- C+ B- B+ A+ F A+ D+ B F A B- 37% 18% 45% B B- F B- F+ C- F C- F
1.27 68% 45% 33% +6 0 1.13 33% 1.2 .39 12% .62 69% .43 1.11 50% 56% 27% -4 0 0.94 39% 0.9 .37 14% .44 72% .32
Dec
21
Eastern Kentucky B C- F C D- 54% 5% 41% A+ C- B A+ A+ A F F F A+ F A+ A A 20% 34% 46% A A A+ F A+ F+ A+ A+ A+
1.31 60% 33% 35% +1 +3 1.11 38% 1.4 .54 10% .23 57% .13 0.85 82% 16% 27% -8 -3 0.80 15% 1.3 .20 13% .12 57% .07
Dec
31
UAB B+ A+ F A+ B- 36% 30% 34% D- C+ A+ B+ A+ C- B+ B- B+ B- D+ A- A+ B- 47% 33% 20% B+ B- B D C C- F C F
1.15 72% 7% 47% +2 -1 1.04 43% 1.1 .46 17% .30 75% .22 1.08 63% 29% 20% -5 -1 0.90 29% 1.1 .31 11% .41 71% .29
Jan
3
Charlotte A+ B D- B- B- 42% 18% 40% B- B- A+ A A+ C- B A+ A F A F D+ B- 39% 16% 45% C+ B- F F F F F D F
1.34 65% 30% 36% +3 +1 1.09 56% 1.3 .73 15% .35 82% .28 1.39 50% 56% 36% +1 +1 1.05 45% 1.4 .63 12% .58 76% .44
Jan
7
Rice F F F C- F 39% 27% 34% B- F C F F+ A A+ B A+ B- C+ F A+ F+ 22% 45% 33% A+ D+ A A+ A+ D C A- B-
0.99 41% 17% 33% -13 -1 0.75 33% 0.7 .22 11% .54 77% .42 1.02 55% 59% 25% +4 -4 1.02 27% 0.7 .19 15% .29 63% .18
Jan
11
North Texas B- C- A A+ A+ 52% 25% 23% B- A A+ F+ B- F+ A+ B- A+ B A+ B F+ A 60% 25% 15% C A D+ C- D+ C D+ D+ D
1.10 57% 45% 50% +6 0 1.16 43% 0.8 .36 25% .55 72% .40 0.94 39% 29% 38% -13 +1 0.78 36% 1.0 .36 17% .37 73% .27
Jan
15
Florida Atlantic D F+ D+ F F 55% 22% 24% C+ F A+ F B- C- A F C F+ F F C F 46% 21% 32% C- F C- A+ A+ C- D+ A C+
0.96 47% 33% 23% -11 +1 0.82 38% 0.8 .31 17% .40 57% .22 1.21 73% 58% 33% +11 0 1.25 33% 0.5 .17 17% .33 63% .21
Jan
18
South Florida A- F F A+ B 41% 20% 39% B- B A+ F C+ A+ B F C B A+ A+ F B- 42% 16% 42% A- B B+ A+ A+ C- B- D+ C+
1.12 42% 25% 52% +1 0 1.05 41% 0.7 .30 14% .35 61% .21 1.11 42% 22% 42% -5 +1 0.95 34% 0.9 .30 14% .33 77% .26
Jan
21
East Carolina B- A A+ F F 26% 20% 54% C- F A+ B+ A+ A A- C A- B+ C A+ A+ A 33% 35% 31% A- A A- A+ A+ F B- A B+
1.18 69% 60% 15% -8 -1 0.84 43% 1.3 .55 12% .33 74% .25 0.92 56% 21% 24% -12 -2 0.74 27% 0.8 .20 9% .32 63% .20
Jan
24
Memphis C- B D+ C- B- 39% 21% 39% C+ B- C- A- B- B F F F A+ C+ C- A+ A+ 27% 35% 37% A+ A+ A+ F B- A A+ C A
1.03 64% 33% 32% 0 0 1.02 31% 1.1 .33 18% .14 63% .08 0.82 57% 39% 16% -10 -3 0.76 24% 1.6 .38 24% .20 73% .15
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows
Feb
1
Tulsa B F B+ C- F 47% 24% 29% C+ F B- A+ A+ A+ A+ F A+ D F F+ C- F 42% 19% 40% A- D- C- F F C+ F A+ D-
1.14 38% 42% 33% -9 0 0.84 30% 1.5 .47 11% .50 63% .31 1.28 75% 44% 37% +10 0 1.23 33% 2.1 .71 15% .44 70% .31
Feb
4
Charlotte D+ C+ A+ C B 43% 20% 37% C+ B C- F D A+ A+ F C- A B+ D D C+ 35% 33% 33% A+ B A- A+ A+ A B+ C B+
1.11 62% 50% 33% +4 0 1.10 29% 0.9 .26 9% .40 50% .20 0.96 53% 44% 38% +2 -2 1.02 28% 0.4 .11 23% .27 71% .19
Feb
8
Tulane D+ B- A+ D- C+ 42% 16% 42% B- B- C+ F F+ F+ C+ F F+ A+ D A+ A+ A+ 45% 20% 35% C- A A- A+ A+ A D- F+ F
1.03 61% 56% 30% +2 +1 1.07 36% 0.6 .21 21% .33 53% .17 0.84 64% 10% 18% -12 +1 0.80 16% 0.7 .11 19% .41 83% .34
Feb
11
South Florida F D D F F 27% 29% 44% D- F B- F D- C+ C+ D+ C A+ B- F A B- 48% 18% 34% A- B- C B+ B A+ F A+ F
0.84 50% 33% 22% -12 -2 0.75 33% 0.5 .18 19% .32 67% .21 0.95 52% 50% 27% -4 +1 0.95 39% 1.0 .39 26% .54 61% .33
Feb
14
Tulsa B A- A+ F B 43% 31% 25% D B- A F C A+ A+ F A B- B- F A- B 20% 25% 55% A+ A A A+ A+ D+ C+ C C+
1.18 68% 56% 15% +3 -1 1.06 36% 0.9 .31 9% .43 63% .27 1.13 55% 50% 30% -1 -2 0.96 24% 1.0 .24 13% .32 79% .25
Feb
18
East Carolina C- B- A+ F C- 38% 28% 34% D+ C- C- F D- C B+ F C+ B- A+ F A+ F+ 35% 48% 17% A+ D+ B A+ A+ F C- A+ B
1.04 63% 56% 23% +1 -1 1.02 30% 0.9 .27 17% .31 65% .21 1.01 38% 61% 25% +1 -4 0.97 30% 0.7 .22 12% .36 57% .21
Feb
21
Temple C F D+ A+ C 26% 44% 31% F D+ A+ D B+ D A+ C A+ A A+ A+ D+ A+ 24% 53% 22% A+ A+ C+ F D D C A+ B+
1.12 40% 35% 50% +2 -4 0.97 42% 0.9 .39 18% .58 72% .42 0.93 42% 27% 36% -9 -5 0.73 28% 1.2 .33 11% .35 63% .22
Feb
26
Memphis A+ A+ B- F C 30% 38% 32% F C- A+ C+ A A+ A+ A- A+ D+ D+ F C F 23% 55% 21% A+ F+ A+ C- A+ F B D B-
1.22 75% 40% 18% -2 -3 0.92 46% 0.9 .44 11% .52 79% .41 1.14 62% 55% 33% +10 -6 1.11 19% 1.2 .22 10% .26 76% .20
Mar
1
Texas San Antonio B- D F D+ F+ 26% 31% 43% F F A B- A C+ C+ A+ A- B- A+ A+ A A+ 43% 26% 30% C+ A+ C+ F F F F C F
1.21 53% 28% 32% -6 -2 0.86 47% 1.2 .56 14% .28 88% .25 0.96 35% 21% 25% -19 0 0.64 29% 1.4 .40 9% .44 71% .31
Mar
7
Florida Atlantic A A- C+ C- B+ 34% 40% 26% F C+ A- A+ A+ A F A+ D- B F A F D+ 29% 41% 31% A+ C+ C+ A+ A+ A- F+ F F
1.26 65% 39% 33% +3 -3 1.02 34% 1.5 .51 11% .19 92% .18 1.00 71% 30% 40% +3 -3 1.02 30% 0.4 .12 21% .36 80% .29
Mar
14
Tulsa A D+ C- A+ A+ 22% 30% 48% F A- A+ D+ A- C+ A- C- B+ A A+ A+ C- A+ 27% 24% 49% A+ A+ C- A B C- A- A+ A+
1.25 55% 33% 50% +9 -2 1.16 39% 1.1 .42 15% .33 72% .24 1.05 43% 17% 36% -8 -1 0.84 33% 1.1 .35 14% .27 67% .18




Numbers in tables represent percent chance of outcome occurring.




Projected American Athletic Finish

0-18 1-17 2-16 3-15 4-14 5-13 6-12 7-11 8-10 9-9 10-8 11-7 12-6 13-5 14-4 15-3 16-2 17-1 18-0 Total
1st 1st
2nd 100.0 100.0 2nd
3rd 3rd
4th 4th
5th 5th
6th 6th
7th 7th
8th 8th
9th 9th
10th 10th
11th 11th
12th 12th
13th 13th
Total 100.0 Total



American Athletic Regular Season Championship

Record Champion Total Outright 2-Way 3-Way 4-Way 5-Way 6-Way 7-Way 8-Way
18-0
17-1
16-2
15-3
14-4
13-5 0.0%
12-6
11-7
10-8
9-9
Total



NCAA Tournament Selection

Conf RecordRecord ChanceTourney
Bid
AutoAt-LargeAvg
Seed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 No Bid At-Large if not Auto
18-0
17-1
16-2
15-3
14-4
13-5 100.0% 34.7% 34.7% 0.0% 11.3 0.3 22.1 12.2 0.1 65.3 0.0%
12-6
11-7
10-8
9-9
8-10
7-11
6-12
5-13
4-14
3-15
2-16
1-17
0-18
Total 100% 34.7% 34.7% 0.0% 11.3 65.3 0.0%


Best / Worst Case Scenarios

ChanceTourney
Bid
Avg
Seed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Win Out 34.7% 100.0% 11.3 0.9 63.7 35.2 0.2
Win Out, Lose in Conf. Tourney Championship 65.3% 0.0% 11.0 0.0