North Texas
American Athletic
2019-20 - 2025-26 - 2026-27
Switch to All-time Team Page
All team stats adjusted for opponents. See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.

Predictive Rating +1.3 141
Results Rating +0.8 149
Consistency 0.13 65
Pace 63.5 314
Improvement +0.4 179

Overall 1st FGA Second Chance TOs Free
throws
Shot Selection
Offense D+ 251 D C+ C B- B-
Defense B 61 B- C A D C+

Offense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 48% 6 C- 56% 213 +4.8 32
2 Pt. Jumpers 45% 97 F+ 30% 359 -1.9 277
Three Pointers 32% 343 F+ 28% 355 -7.2 353
Shot Selection/Accuracy B- +0.8 78 D- -5.0 335
1st FG Attempt D 0.93 313
Second Chance B- 34.2% 74 C- 0.99 248 C+ 0.34 115
Opponents' Steals C 9.3% 164
Other Turnovers C- 7.9% 254
Turnovers C 17.2% 203
Freethrows B 0.35 57 C- 71% 246 B- 0.24 100
Total Offense D+ -3.0 251

Assists Blocks (Opponents')
Close Shots C- 46% 219 B- 8.9% 73
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots C 26% 151 F 13.2% 364
Three Pointers D+ 81% 259 C 0.9% 199
Total D+ 51% 279 D- 7.2% 330

Defense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 38% 201 C 57% 160 -0.6 150
2 Pt. Jumpers 23% 83 B 34% 36 +0.1 192
Three Pointers 39% 254 C+ 33% 106 -2.0 98
Shot Selection/Accuracy C+ -0.4 101 B- -2.1 91
1st FG Attempt B- 0.97 94
Second Chance C- 31.8% 248 C+ 1.01 145 C 0.32 214
Turnovers from Steals A 13.2% 9
Other Turnovers B+ 8.7% 38
Turnovers A 22.0% 9
Freethrows D- 0.37 330 B- 71% 92 D 0.26 320
Total Defense B +4.3 61

Assists Blocks
Close Shots C- 50% 202 C+ 12.2% 121
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots A- 13% 6 A- 9.6% 20
Three Pointers C- 86% 243 A+ 3.3% 4
Total C+ 54% 141 B+ 8.1% 29

Miscellaneous
Offense Defense
Possession Length 18.4 290 17.5 232
Fast Break Points Per Possession 0.23 39 0.18 230
Consistency 0.11 102 0.11 96
Improvement +3.2 39 -2.9 316

NCAA Tournament Selection
At-Large Selection Status Out of Consideration
Projected Seeding Not in Tournament  

Prediction Ranges
Pessimistic
5th Percentile
Expected
50th Percentile
Optimistic
95th Percentile
Predictive Rating Rank 163 141 121
Results Rating Rank 176 150 122
Conference Record 8 - 10 9 - 9 10 - 8
Conference Finish 10 7 4
NCAA Tourney Seed None None None
NCAA Tourney Finish None None None

NowWin NextLose Next
#1 Overall Seed 0% 0% 0%
#1 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 2 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 4 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 6 Seed 0% 0% 0%
NCAA Tourney Bid 2% 2% 1%
At-Large Bid if not Auto Qualifier 0% 0% 0%
Average Seed 13.2 13.0 13.9
.500 or above 81% 93% 53%
.500 or above in Conference 67% 85% 24%
Conference Champion 0% 0% 0%
Last Place in Conference 0% 0% 0%
First Four0% 0% 0%
First Round2% 2% 1%
Second Round0% 0% 0%
Sweet Sixteen0% 0% 0%
Elite Eight0% 0% 0%
Final Four0% 0% 0%
Championship Game0% 0% 0%
National Champion0% 0% 0%
Next Game: Tulane (Home) - 69.9% chance of victory

Projected Record by Quadrant
QuadProjectedProjected Cumulative
Quad 1a0 - 10 - 1
Quad 1b0 - 20 - 3
Quad 21 - 51 - 8
Quad 36 - 47 - 12
Quad 49 - 317 - 15


Date Opponent Result/Prediction Lead Record Total Rating Offense Defense
Avg Time Overall Conf Total First
FGA
2nd Chance TOs Total First
FGA
2nd Chance TOs
 Thu, Nov 6 269 Northwestern St. W 80 - 53 84% +8  95% 1 - 0 A- +18 A+ +16 A+ A+ C- B+ +7 C A+ A+
 Sun, Nov 9 283 Loyola Chicago W 64 - 62 78% +4  75% 2 - 0 D+ -5 F -11 F+ F F B+ +6 A+ C C+
 Wed, Nov 12 155 @Oregon St. L 64 - 66 43% +6  90% 2 - 1 C +1 D+ -3 B- C+ F B- +3 A- B D-
 Fri, Nov 14 37 @St. Mary's L 49 - 80 8% -23  4% 2 - 2 D- -14 F -15 F D A- C -1 A F A+
 Thu, Nov 20 173 Central Arkansas W 74 - 56 69% +5  75% 3 - 2 B+ +14 D+ -3 F D+ A A+ +17 A- A+ A+
 Tue, Nov 25 178 Eastern Washington W 79 - 71 OT 70% +2  69% 4 - 2 C+ +4 D -4 F B- C A- +8 A B B
 Sun, Nov 30 331 Prairie View W 72 - 69 92% -2  24% 5 - 2 D -11 F -10 B F F C -1 C- C- C
 Tue, Dec 2 294 Houston Christian W 77 - 75 87% +1  58% 6 - 2 D -9 B +6 A+ B- F F -14 F A+ F
 Sun, Dec 7 50 TCU L 55 - 65 25% -2  24% 6 - 3 C- -2 F -12 F+ C- C- A +9 A F+ A+
 Sun, Dec 14 185 @South Alabama W 58 - 57 50% +4  79% 7 - 3 C+ +2 F -10 F B+ F A+ +13 A+ F A-
 Wed, Dec 17 43 Santa Clara L 60 - 63 15% +2  60% 7 - 4 B +9 F+ -9 F A B+ A+ +18 A+ F A+
 Wed, Dec 31 108 @Memphis L 48 - 57 29% -8  0% 7 - 5 0 - 1 C- -2 F -18 F C F A+ +16 C- B- A+
 Sun, Jan 4 64 Tulsa W 72 - 67 33% -0  39% 8 - 5 1 - 1 B +11 B- +5 C A B+ B+ +7 A+ F+ A+
 Wed, Jan 7 55 South Florida L 70 - 74 29% -0  43% 8 - 6 1 - 2 C+ +3 C- -0 B- B- C+ B- +3 B- F A+
 Sun, Jan 11 93 @Wichita St. L 67 - 78 23% -8  4% 8 - 7 1 - 3 C- -2 D+ -4 F B+ C B- +2 F B- A+
 Sun, Jan 18 180 @Tulane W 71 - 63 48% +6  87% 9 - 7 2 - 3 B +10 C -0 C- D+ F A +10 A+ C+ B-
 Wed, Jan 21 336 Texas San Antonio W 81 - 62 92% +14  99% 10 - 7 3 - 3 C+ +4 C +1 C A+ F+ B +4 C+ A+ A
 Fri, Jan 23 248 East Carolina L 59 - 63 81% -3  3% 10 - 8 3 - 4 D- -12 F -14 F C- A+ C+ +1 B- F A+
 Wed, Jan 28 64 @Tulsa L 66 - 82 16% -4  5% 10 - 9 3 - 5 C- -4 D- -8 D- D- C- B +4 B D- B+
 Sat, Jan 31 112 UAB L 68 - 72 54% -0  49% 10 - 10 3 - 6 C- -4 D+ -3 D- D A+ C -1 F C- A+
 Wed, Feb 4 237 @Rice L 83 - 86 2OT 59% +1  45% 10 - 11 3 - 7 C- -4 D -5 F+ D+ B C+ +2 A F A+
 Sat, Feb 7 336 @Texas San Antonio W 81 - 58 82% +10  57% 11 - 11 4 - 7 B+ +14 C +2 D A- D- A+ +13 B B- A+
 Thu, Feb 12 108 Memphis W 76 - 69 52% -0  42% 12 - 11 5 - 7 B- +8 B- +5 C- A+ D+ B- +3 B+ D+ A
 Sun, Feb 15 156 @Temple W 65 - 62 43% -3  24% 13 - 11 6 - 7 B- +6 D+ -4 F C+ A+ A +10 D- B+ A+
 Wed, Feb 18 180 Tulane W 70 - 64 70%
 Thu, Feb 19 180 Tulane L 71 - 77 70% +3  65% 13 - 12 6 - 8 D -10 C- -1 F A+ C- F+ -9 C- F C
 Sun, Feb 22 120 Florida Atlantic W 73 - 72 55% +1  53% 14 - 12 7 - 8 C +1 B- +5 C+ D B D+ -4 D A+ F
 Wed, Feb 25 169 @Charlotte L 79 - 80 47% +1  48% 14 - 13 7 - 9 C +1 A- +10 A B A F+ -9 F C B
 Sun, Mar 1 112 @UAB L 66 - 71 32%
 Wed, Mar 4 237 Rice W 71 - 63 78%
Totals 16 - 14 9 - 10 +1 D+ -3 A+ D- B- B +4 F+ C- B-



Game Detail
Grades are adjusted for opponent strength in each category. Game stats are not adjusted for oppoent strength. See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.
Offense Defense
Tot Off First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows Tot Def First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot
2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot
Season Ratings D+ C- F+ F+ D- 48% 45% 32% B- D B- C- C+ C B C- B- B C B C+ B- 38% 23% 39% C+ B- C- C+ C A D- B- D
1.04 56% 30% 28% -5 +1 0.93 34% 1.0 .34 17% .35 71% .24 1.02 57% 34% 33% -2 0 0.97 32% 1.0 .32 22% .37 71% .24
Nov
6
Northwestern St. A+ A- A A+ A+ 38% 14% 48% C+ A+ A+ B A+ C- A+ F B+ B+ A+ F A- D 16% 41% 44% A+ C F A+ A+ A+ F C F
1.35 69% 50% 45% +14 +1 1.31 46% 1.3 .58 19% .46 64% .29 0.90 40% 54% 29% 0 -4 0.94 33% 0.3 .10 27% .63 74% .46
Nov
9
Loyola Chicago F C+ F D+ F 50% 21% 29% B F+ B+ F F F A+ B A+ B+ B- A+ A+ A+ 39% 11% 50% C A+ D- B C C+ F C F
0.97 57% 11% 33% -7 +1 0.90 35% 0.5 .16 18% .50 81% .41 0.94 53% 20% 18% -16 +1 0.73 36% 0.8 .30 20% .59 68% .40
Nov
12
Oregon St. D+ D+ A+ C C+ 56% 7% 37% A B- A- F+ C+ F C D C- B- A+ F C A 37% 9% 53% F+ A- A- D B D- F D- F
1.02 52% 67% 33% -2 +3 1.05 40% 0.8 .33 22% .33 69% .22 1.05 31% 50% 35% -8 +1 0.88 20% 1.3 .27 14% .52 82% .43
Nov
14
St. Mary's F F F C- F 47% 17% 36% B+ F D+ F D A- C A+ B C A+ A+ D A+ 47% 13% 40% F+ A F C- F A+ F C F
0.73 16% 22% 32% -24 +1 0.57 21% 0.7 .15 12% .24 86% .20 1.20 43% 17% 39% -7 +2 0.91 54% 1.2 .62 22% .41 81% .33
Nov
20
Central Arkansas D+ A+ F F F 43% 25% 32% D F B- F D+ A A+ A+ A+ A+ A- A+ C+ A 37% 16% 47% C- A- D- A+ A+ A+ F A+ F
1.08 74% 18% 14% -8 0 0.86 31% 0.9 .29 15% .55 84% .46 0.82 50% 17% 33% -7 +1 0.89 33% 0.5 .15 28% .64 56% .36
Nov
25
Eastern Washington D C+ D F F 42% 17% 42% C F C A B- C A+ F A A- C+ A- A- A 40% 26% 34% B- A F+ A+ B B D+ D- D
1.08 60% 38% 20% -8 +1 0.88 32% 1.3 .41 16% .49 67% .33 0.97 55% 31% 29% -5 -1 0.90 36% 0.8 .28 21% .33 79% .26
Nov
30
Prairie View F A+ F A+ B 52% 20% 27% B- B C- F F F A+ D A C C C- A C 49% 27% 24% F C- A- F C- C D+ F+ D-
1.02 74% 0% 50% +7 +1 1.18 34% 0.6 .21 27% .51 69% .35 0.98 54% 38% 25% -5 0 0.92 18% 1.5 .27 16% .37 82% .30
Dec
2
Houston Christian B C+ F A+ A+ 61% 5% 34% A+ A+ C+ B B- F A+ F D+ F F C- F F 39% 18% 43% D+ F A A+ A+ F F A+ F
1.24 64% 0% 64% +17 +4 1.44 35% 1.2 .42 24% .40 47% .19 1.21 71% 38% 42% +10 0 1.23 21% 0.3 .06 6% .55 59% .33
Dec
7
TCU F C- F F F 59% 14% 27% A F+ F A+ C- C- A- C+ B+ A C F A+ A 40% 30% 30% A A D+ F+ F+ A+ F A D
0.82 54% 17% 17% -13 +2 0.82 14% 1.8 .24 21% .32 71% .23 0.97 59% 46% 15% -6 -1 0.88 38% 1.2 .47 25% .44 64% .28
Dec
14
South Alabama F C A+ F F 20% 4% 76% C+ F C A+ B+ F A D- A- A+ A B A+ A+ 67% 14% 19% F A+ F+ F F A- F D+ F
0.91 60% 50% 19% -16 +1 0.71 31% 1.4 .43 22% .32 69% .22 0.89 46% 33% 0% -18 +3 0.71 29% 1.4 .42 17% .41 68% .28
Dec
17
Santa Clara F+ D- B F F 61% 12% 27% A F B A+ A B+ A+ D+ A+ A+ B+ C A+ A+ 33% 20% 47% B A+ F+ F F A+ D A+ C+
0.89 52% 40% 9% -13 +3 0.80 34% 1.3 .45 18% .49 70% .34 0.93 53% 44% 24% -7 0 0.87 43% 1.6 .70 31% .28 62% .17
Dec
31
Memphis F D+ D+ F F 52% 13% 35% A F D- A C F F F F A+ D+ F A D+ 39% 24% 37% C C- D+ A- B- A+ D+ A+ A+
0.72 54% 33% 6% -17 +2 0.72 26% 1.1 .29 27% .17 63% .10 0.86 63% 50% 27% +1 0 1.02 38% 1.0 .38 30% .32 27% .09
Jan
4
Tulsa B- C+ F B+ C 44% 27% 29% C- C B- A+ A B+ A- A- A B+ A D A A+ 51% 16% 33% C+ A+ C F F+ A+ F D F
1.16 60% 25% 38% -1 0 1.00 29% 1.4 .42 13% .33 78% .26 1.08 45% 43% 29% -8 +1 0.88 32% 1.6 .50 21% .51 84% .43
Jan
7
South Florida C- B D- C+ C+ 46% 26% 28% C+ B- C+ C+ B- C+ B F F+ B- C- A+ A B- 50% 11% 39% C B- C F F A+ F C- F
1.02 61% 31% 36% 0 0 1.02 32% 1.0 .32 19% .36 45% .16 1.08 58% 25% 27% -6 +2 0.95 39% 1.5 .58 25% .70 75% .53
Jan
11
Wichita St. D+ F F B+ F 60% 25% 15% A F A- B- B+ C A B A B- C F+ F F 52% 25% 23% D+ F D A- B- A+ F D F
0.94 39% 29% 38% -13 +1 0.78 36% 1.0 .36 17% .37 73% .27 1.10 57% 45% 50% +6 0 1.16 43% 0.8 .36 25% .55 72% .40
Jan
18
Tulane C F+ D B+ D+ 47% 13% 40% B+ C- A F D+ F A+ A+ A+ A A+ A+ D+ A+ 25% 23% 52% A A+ C+ C+ C+ B- F C F
1.06 48% 33% 39% -3 +2 1.00 44% 0.6 .28 22% .52 81% .42 0.94 36% 10% 35% -11 -1 0.77 21% 1.1 .24 16% .59 76% .44
Jan
21
Texas San Antonio C C+ F B- C- 43% 12% 45% B- C A+ C A+ F+ A+ F A+ B A D B- C 27% 27% 45% A C+ A- A+ A+ A F F F
1.19 62% 17% 36% +1 +1 1.06 54% 1.1 .59 19% .47 62% .29 0.91 42% 42% 30% -6 -2 0.86 24% 0.5 .12 22% .45 83% .38
Jan
23
East Carolina F D+ F F F 41% 26% 33% C- F C- C+ C- A+ C+ D- C C+ A+ A+ F C+ 33% 30% 38% B B- F F F A+ F D F
0.92 55% 21% 17% -14 -1 0.72 29% 1.2 .33 11% .28 69% .19 0.98 38% 25% 40% -7 -2 0.85 45% 1.2 .55 28% .50 74% .37
Jan
28
Tulsa D- F+ A+ F F 56% 12% 33% A D- B F D- C- A+ F B+ B C+ B B- A- 56% 6% 38% F+ B C+ F D- B+ D F+ F+
0.93 48% 50% 24% -9 +2 0.88 30% 0.7 .21 17% .37 64% .24 1.16 56% 33% 33% -2 +3 1.04 31% 1.6 .48 18% .36 86% .31
Jan
31
UAB D+ C+ D+ F F+ 50% 23% 27% B- D- C- F D A+ A+ C A+ C F F C+ F 43% 23% 34% C F B+ F C- A+ C- A+ B-
1.02 62% 33% 14% -7 +1 0.88 25% 0.7 .17 9% .38 74% .28 1.08 70% 45% 31% +5 0 1.13 27% 1.3 .33 18% .33 61% .20
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows
Feb
4
Rice D A+ D+ F D- 31% 41% 28% F+ F+ B F D+ B B+ F C+ C+ F A+ B+ A- 13% 37% 50% A+ A F D+ F A+ F C F
1.03 79% 32% 18% -3 -3 0.90 37% 0.8 .29 14% .39 67% .26 1.07 71% 25% 30% -6 -4 0.81 51% 1.0 .49 27% .44 69% .31
Feb
7
Texas San Antonio C A- F F D 48% 19% 33% C+ D A+ D- A- D- A+ A+ A+ A+ F+ A- A+ B- 41% 30% 28% B+ B B- C+ B- A+ F B+ F+
1.16 70% 22% 25% -2 +1 1.00 53% 1.0 .50 19% .41 83% .33 0.83 63% 29% 15% -9 -1 0.83 27% 0.9 .24 26% .35 67% .23
Feb
12
Memphis B- D C+ F D+ 49% 21% 31% B+ C- A A+ A+ D+ A+ B- A+ B- C A+ C B+ 36% 32% 32% B+ B+ B- F D+ A C+ F D
1.10 53% 38% 25% -7 +1 0.90 42% 1.2 .48 22% .76 76% .58 1.00 59% 20% 33% -6 -2 0.87 34% 1.3 .46 23% .28 87% .25
Feb
15
Temple D+ D- F F F 60% 20% 20% B+ F B- C- C+ A+ B B- B A F+ D F F 14% 33% 52% A+ D- D+ A+ B+ A+ C A+ A+
1.02 50% 30% 10% -14 +2 0.78 33% 1.0 .33 8% .34 75% .26 0.97 67% 43% 41% +8 -3 1.12 31% 0.7 .22 25% .36 53% .19
Feb
19
Tulane C- F B F F 45% 33% 21% D- F B+ A+ A+ C- A+ B- A+ F+ F A+ D+ D+ 38% 21% 42% C+ C- F C- F C D- B+ D+
1.08 42% 43% 22% -9 -1 0.81 41% 1.3 .54 18% .54 72% .39 1.17 72% 10% 35% 0 0 1.02 32% 1.2 .38 15% .43 71% .31
Feb
22
Florida Atlantic B- C+ A- D C+ 46% 20% 35% C C+ A F D B A+ B A+ D+ F A+ F F 33% 33% 33% A+ D A+ A+ A+ F B+ A- A-
1.14 57% 44% 31% -1 +1 1.02 36% 0.5 .19 14% .53 76% .40 1.12 72% 22% 50% +7 -2 1.13 18% 0.3 .06 9% .24 64% .15
Feb
25
Charlotte A- A- F A+ A+ 31% 25% 43% D A B B- B A F F F F+ F A- F F 44% 18% 38% C+ F A F C B F F F
1.25 69% 23% 50% +10 -1 1.20 34% 1.2 .41 9% .19 55% .10 1.26 88% 29% 47% +19 +1 1.41 25% 1.2 .30 21% .52 81% .42




Numbers in tables represent percent chance of outcome occurring.




Projected American Athletic Finish

0-18 1-17 2-16 3-15 4-14 5-13 6-12 7-11 8-10 9-9 10-8 11-7 12-6 13-5 14-4 15-3 16-2 17-1 18-0 Total
1st 1st
2nd 2nd
3rd 3rd
4th 7.0 7.0 4th
5th 7.3 10.6 17.9 5th
6th 0.0 22.3 0.4 22.8 6th
7th 1.4 16.0 17.5 7th
8th 8.1 3.1 11.2 8th
9th 0.4 13.5 0.2 14.0 9th
10th 3.9 5.1 9.0 10th
11th 0.7 0.7 11th
12th 12th
13th 13th
Total 5.0 28.2 48.8 18.0 Total



American Athletic Regular Season Championship

Record Champion Total Outright 2-Way 3-Way 4-Way 5-Way 6-Way 7-Way 8-Way
18-0
17-1
16-2
15-3
14-4
13-5
12-6
11-7
10-8 0.0%
9-9 0.0%
Total



NCAA Tournament Selection

Conf RecordRecord ChanceTourney
Bid
AutoAt-LargeAvg
Seed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 No Bid At-Large if not Auto
18-0
17-1
16-2
15-3
14-4
13-5
12-6
11-7
10-8 18.0% 4.4% 4.4% 12.6 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 17.3
9-9 48.8% 1.7% 1.7% 13.2 0.1 0.5 0.3 0.0 48.0
8-10 28.2% 1.2% 1.2% 14.2 0.0 0.2 0.1 27.9
7-11 5.0% 0.9% 0.9% 14.7 0.0 0.0 4.9
6-12
5-13
4-14
3-15
2-16
1-17
0-18
Total 100% 2.0% 2.0% 0.0% 13.2 98.0 0.0%


Best / Worst Case Scenarios

ChanceTourney
Bid
Avg
Seed
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Win Out 0.8% 100.0% 12.6 1.3 43.9 51.6 2.5 0.6
Win Out, Lose in Conf. Tourney Championship 1.7%
Win Out, Lose in Conf. Tourney Semi-Final 5.8%
Lose Out 2.6%