Tulsa
American Athletic
2024-25 - 2025-26 - 2026-27
Switch to All-time Team Page
All team stats adjusted for opponents. See methodology page for details.

Predictive Rating +9.1 65
Results Rating +9.2 66
Consistency 0.18 318
Pace 69.1 156
Improvement -0.3 197

Overall 1st FGA Second Chance TOs Free
throws		 Shot Selection
Offense B+ 39 B B+ B B+ A-
Defense C+ 139 C+ C C- B- C

Offense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 43% 68 C 58% 177 +2.3 94
2 Pt. Jumpers 17% 354 C- 36% 240 -4.5 358
Three Pointers 48% 37 A- 39% 17 +7.2 13
Shot Selection/Accuracy A- +1.7 12 B- +3.0 86
1st FG Attempt B 1.12 53
Second Chance C+ 31.6% 141 A+ 1.27 3 B+ 0.40 35
Opponents' Steals B- 8.6% 102
Other Turnovers B 6.2% 60
Turnovers B 14.8% 72
Freethrows B- 0.34 75 A 79% 4 B+ 0.27 25
Total Offense B+ +8.0 39

Assists Opponents' Blocks
Close Shots C- 45% 239 B- 9.5% 106
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots D+ 19% 269 B+ 2.5% 24
Three Pointers C+ 86% 138 C 0.9% 193
Total B- 60% 87 B- 4.7% 83


Defense Breakdown
Attempts Conversion Rate Total Effect
Close Shots 38% 215 C- 59% 201 -0.2 164
2 Pt. Jumpers 20% 190 A- 32% 13 -1.5 66
Three Pointers 42% 130 C 34% 178 +0.7 224
Shot Selection/Accuracy C +0.0 169 C+ -1.0 139
1st FG Attempt C+ 1.00 145
Second Chance B 26.4% 50 D- 1.16 337 C 0.30 166
Turnovers from Steals C 9.6% 170
Other Turnovers D+ 6.6% 270
Turnovers C- 16.2% 206
Freethrows B 0.26 67 C- 73% 244 B- 0.19 81
Total Defense C+ +1.1 139

Assists Blocks
Close Shots C- 50% 218 D+ 8.6% 268
2 Pt. Jumpers Shots C 25% 187 D- 1.7% 338
Three Pointers B+ 77% 32 C 1.0% 135
Total C 55% 184 D 4.0% 307

Miscellaneous
Offense Defense
Possession Length 16.4 83 18.1 286
Fast Break Points Per Possession 0.20 89 0.13 66
Consistency 0.12 167 0.11 92
Improvement -1.9 286 +1.6 108

NCAA Tournament Selection
At-Large Selection Status Longshot
Projected Seeding Not in Tournament  

Prediction Ranges
Pessimistic
5th Percentile 		Expected
50th Percentile 		Optimistic
95th Percentile
Predictive Rating Rank 71 63 56
Results Rating Rank 74 64 47
Conference Record 13 - 5 13 - 5 13 - 5
Conference Finish 2 2 2
NCAA Tourney Seed None None 11
NCAA Tourney Finish None None 2nd Round

NowWin NextLose Next
#1 Overall Seed 0% 0% 0%
#1 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 2 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 4 Seed 0% 0% 0%
Top 6 Seed 0% 0% 0%
NCAA Tourney Bid 32% 53% 2%
At-Large Bid if not Auto Qualifier 5% 8% 2%
Average Seed 11.2 11.2 11.3
.500 or above 100% 100% 100%
.500 or above in Conference 100% 100% 100.0%
Conference Champion 0% 0% 0.0%
Last Place in Conference 0% 0% 0.0%
First Four3% 4% 2%
First Round30% 50% 1%
Second Round6% 10% 0%
Sweet Sixteen1% 2% 0%
Elite Eight0% 0% 0%
Final Four0% 0% 0%
Championship Game0% 0% 0%
National Champion0% 0% 0%

Projected Record by Quadrant
QuadProjectedProjected Cumulative
Quad 1a0 - 00 - 0
Quad 1b0 - 10 - 1
Quad 24 - 44 - 5
Quad 39 - 213 - 7
Quad 412 - 025 - 7


Date Opponent Result/Prediction Lead Record Total Rating Offense Defense
Avg Time Overall Conf Total First
FGA		 2nd Chance TOs Total First
FGA		 2nd Chance TOs
 Fri, Nov 7 136 Rhode Island W 82 - 65 77% +9  93% 1 - 0 A +18 A+ +17 B+ A+ C- B- +3 C+ D A
 Wed, Nov 12 313 @Oral Roberts W 88 - 87 92% -2  21% 2 - 0 D+ -5 B +7 D+ B D+ F -12 F D F
 Mon, Nov 17 97 @Kansas St. L 83 - 84 53% -3  15% 2 - 1 B- +7 B +6 D+ C- A+ C+ +2 A F D-
 Fri, Nov 21 185 Austin Peay W 84 - 75 89% -2  27% 3 - 1 C+ +5 B+ +9 A D+ B- D+ -4 F+ B D-
 Tue, Nov 25 212 San Jose St. W 81 - 51 87% +13  92% 4 - 1 A+ +27 A +12 A- A+ B+ A+ +19 A+ B A
 Wed, Nov 26 81 Northern Iowa W 63 - 60 56% +3  72% 5 - 1 B +10 C +2 B D B A +9 A+ C C
 Sat, Dec 6 195 Missouri St. W 98 - 74 90% +14  95% 6 - 1 A +19 A+ +23 A+ C A+ D+ -3 F A- A
 Wed, Dec 10 321 Arkansas Pine Bluff W 117 - 84 97% +16  91% 7 - 1 A +20 A+ +23 A+ A+ B+ D -6 F+ F+ B-
 Sat, Dec 13 184 New Mexico St. W 83 - 70 83% +13  98% 8 - 1 B+ +12 B +7 A+ A+ F B +5 B+ B+ C+
 Fri, Dec 19 164 @Western Kentucky W 82 - 81 72% -3  11% 9 - 1 C+ +4 B+ +8 B D A D+ -4 D+ D+ D-
 Mon, Dec 22 254 Denver W 90 - 85 94% +4  91% 10 - 1 C- -3 D+ -4 F+ B B- C +0 B F A
 Wed, Dec 31 224 Rice W 97 - 48 92% +16  99% 11 - 1 1 - 0 A+ +42 A+ +25 A+ B C A+ +22 A+ A+ C+
 Sun, Jan 4 135 @North Texas L 67 - 72 67% +0  40% 11 - 2 1 - 1 C -0 B +7 D+ A+ B- D- -8 D F+ F+
 Sat, Jan 10 53 South Florida L 78 - 93 55% -8  11% 11 - 3 1 - 2 D+ -7 C+ +3 C F+ B- F+ -9 F D+ C
 Wed, Jan 14 169 @Charlotte W 86 - 74 73% +8  94% 12 - 3 2 - 2 B+ +15 A +13 A+ D+ D B- +2 C- A+ F
 Sun, Jan 18 124 @UAB W 99 - 77 64% +10  97% 13 - 3 3 - 2 A+ +28 A+ +25 A+ C+ B B- +2 C A F
 Wed, Jan 21 129 Memphis W 83 - 66 83% +3  72% 14 - 3 4 - 2 A- +16 A +14 D+ A+ A+ B- +3 B+ C+ A
 Sat, Jan 24 224 @Rice W 87 - 81 82% +13  98% 15 - 3 5 - 2 B- +5 A +15 C A+ C+ F+ -9 F D- B
 Wed, Jan 28 135 North Texas W 82 - 66 84% +4  85% 16 - 3 6 - 2 B+ +15 A- +10 B A+ A- B +5 B- A C
 Sun, Feb 1 87 Wichita St. W 93 - 83 70% +6  76% 17 - 3 7 - 2 B+ +14 A+ +17 A+ A+ B- D+ -4 A- D- F+
 Wed, Feb 4 128 @Florida Atlantic W 78 - 76 65% -1  38% 18 - 3 8 - 2 B- +7 B- +4 C+ D+ A B- +3 A F+ F+
 Sun, Feb 8 53 @South Florida L 74 - 80 33% -6  0% 18 - 4 8 - 3 B- +8 B +7 D+ A+ C- C+ +1 C- A+ F
 Wed, Feb 11 124 UAB L 63 - 68 82% -4  14% 18 - 5 8 - 4 D+ -5 F+ -9 C- C F B- +3 B+ C+ D-
 Sat, Feb 14 87 @Wichita St. L 77 - 81 48% +3  84% 18 - 6 8 - 5 B- +6 B+ +9 C+ C- A- D+ -4 D A- F
 Wed, Feb 18 169 Charlotte W 79 - 74 87% +6  88% 19 - 6 9 - 5 C+ +2 B- +4 B C+ D- C- -2 F+ B- C
 Sun, Feb 22 335 Texas San Antonio W 100 - 74 98% +12  88% 20 - 6 10 - 5 B +11 A+ +15 A+ D A+ D+ -5 D- D D+
 Wed, Feb 25 205 @Tulane W 90 - 56 79% +17  91% 21 - 6 11 - 5 A+ +35 A+ +20 A A+ A- A+ +17 A- C+ A
 Thu, Mar 5 235 @East Carolina W 93 - 66 84% +20  98% 22 - 6 12 - 5 A+ +26 A+ +23 A+ A+ A+ B +4 A+ F A+
 Sun, Mar 8 150 Temple W 78 - 76 86% -2  12% 23 - 6 13 - 5 C -0 B- +4 D- B- A- D+ -4 B+ F D+
 Fri, Mar 13 135 North Texas W 90 - 84 3OT 76% -5  33% 24 - 6 B- +8 C- -1 F+ C+ B A- +7 B- A+ D
 Sat, Mar 14 87 Wichita St. W 77 - 75 60%
Totals 25 - 6 13 - 5 +9 B+ +8 A+ B- A- C+ +1 A- A B+



Game Detail
Grades are adjusted for opponent strength in each category. Game stats are not adjusted for oppoent strength. See methodology page for descriptions of rating types.
Offense Defense
Tot Off First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows Tot Def First Field Goal Attempt Second Chance TOs Freethrows
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot Shot Accuracy Shot Selection Points Per Shot
2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot 2 C 2 L 3 Tot Off Reb PPP Tot Att Perc Tot
Season Ratings B+ C C- A- B- 43% 17% 48% A- B C+ A+ B+ B B- A B+ C+ C- A- C C+ 38% 20% 42% C C+ B D- C C- B C- B-
1.20 58% 36% 39% +3 +2 1.12 32% 1.3 .40 15% .34 79% .27 1.07 59% 32% 34% -1 0 1.00 26% 1.2 .30 16% .26 73% .25
Nov
7		 Rhode Island A+ C+ F A+ B+ 47% 16% 38% B B+ A+ A+ A+ C- A+ F B+ B- D+ A+ B- B- 43% 19% 38% C C+ C F D A D F+ F+
1.26 57% 14% 47% +3 +1 1.11 45% 1.6 .72 21% .47 63% .29 1.00 61% 25% 31% -3 +1 0.98 32% 1.1 .36 25% .39 79% .30
Nov
12		 Oral Roberts B D F B- D 51% 9% 40% B+ D+ C+ B B D+ A+ A A+ F F A+ F F 31% 13% 56% C F A+ F D F C- A C+
1.21 50% 25% 37% -4 +2 1.00 34% 1.3 .43 16% .59 78% .46 1.20 76% 0% 42% +8 0 1.18 19% 1.7 .31 14% .32 65% .21
Nov
17		 Kansas St. B C- A+ F D- 44% 5% 51% A+ D+ C+ D C- A+ A+ C+ A+ C+ D- A+ A+ A+ 43% 21% 36% C+ A C- F F D- D- F F
1.10 54% 100% 21% -8 +2 0.91 33% 1.1 .36 12% .44 72% .32 1.11 68% 25% 24% -4 0 0.95 33% 1.4 .47 13% .32 90% .29
Nov
21		 Austin Peay B+ B D A+ A 35% 6% 59% B A D D+ D+ B- D+ A+ A- D+ B F+ F F+ 49% 17% 34% D F+ B C+ B D- B B+ B+
1.23 67% 33% 43% +11 +2 1.27 27% 0.8 .20 16% .28 94% .26 1.10 50% 44% 44% +2 +1 1.09 25% 1.1 .28 13% .27 69% .19
Nov
25		 San Jose St. A D F A+ B+ 48% 6% 46% A A- D A+ A+ B+ F B F A+ A+ A- C- A+ 29% 35% 35% B A+ C A- B A A B+ A
1.32 57% 0% 50% +8 +3 1.23 31% 1.9 .58 15% .19 80% .15 0.83 29% 29% 35% -11 -3 0.75 33% 0.9 .30 20% .20 70% .14
Nov
26		 Northern Iowa C B- D C B 33% 13% 54% B- B F A+ D B B- A+ A A C- A+ A+ A+ 41% 20% 39% C+ A+ B- F+ C C A- C B+
1.00 60% 33% 32% -2 +1 1.00 13% 1.3 .17 16% .28 93% .26 0.95 62% 20% 25% -7 0 0.88 19% 1.3 .25 14% .19 70% .13
Dec
6		 Missouri St. A+ D F A+ A+ 40% 2% 58% A+ A+ A+ F C A+ A+ A- A+ D+ C- A F F 31% 18% 51% D F A+ C- A- A C- A B-
1.46 58% 0% 50% +13 +2 1.33 47% 0.8 .36 10% .50 80% .40 1.10 64% 25% 48% +10 0 1.22 22% 1.1 .25 21% .36 58% .21
Dec
10		 Arkansas Pine Bluff A+ B- D- A+ A+ 49% 5% 45% A A+ C+ A+ A+ B+ A+ A A+ D F B- A- F+ 39% 17% 44% F+ F+ C+ F F+ B- D+ F F+
1.51 63% 33% 48% +12 +3 1.31 37% 1.8 .67 13% .55 84% .46 1.09 81% 33% 29% +5 +1 1.13 24% 1.3 .31 19% .34 86% .29
Dec
13		 New Mexico St. B C D+ A+ A+ 29% 7% 63% B+ A+ C+ A+ A+ F A+ A A+ B A A C A 43% 22% 35% F B+ A+ F B+ C+ F B- F
1.19 58% 33% 42% +8 +1 1.20 32% 1.6 .52 23% .65 83% .54 1.00 45% 27% 33% -8 0 0.86 21% 1.1 .24 16% .44 69% .31
Dec
19		 Western Kentucky B+ B A+ C- B 29% 8% 63% B+ B F A D A A+ C+ A+ D+ A+ A+ F D+ 38% 13% 48% D+ D+ B F D+ D- D- D- F+
1.16 64% 75% 33% +4 +1 1.13 17% 1.2 .20 13% .52 72% .37 1.14 40% 14% 44% -3 +1 0.98 27% 1.3 .35 11% .38 79% .30
Dec
22		 Denver D+ D- A+ F F 67% 2% 31% A+ F+ B+ C B B- B B+ B+ C D- B- A+ B+ 35% 30% 35% C B F F F A F D F
1.17 54% 100% 22% -7 +5 0.97 41% 1.1 .45 12% .35 75% .27 1.11 63% 38% 26% -2 -1 0.94 39% 1.4 .55 20% .42 81% .34
Dec
31		 Rice A+ A F A+ A+ 53% 14% 33% A+ A+ A+ D B C F A+ F+ A+ B+ A+ A+ A+ 24% 31% 45% B- A+ A A+ A+ C+ D+ A+ C+
1.49 74% 14% 71% +23 +2 1.53 44% 0.9 .40 15% .22 83% .18 0.74 50% 20% 23% -15 -2 0.67 27% 0.6 .16 18% .32 59% .19
Jan
4		 North Texas B F B+ D- D- 51% 16% 33% A- D+ C+ A+ A+ B- A+ A+ A+ D- D+ A F D- 44% 27% 29% B+ D B+ F F+ F+ C+ F C-
1.08 45% 43% 29% -8 +1 0.88 32% 1.6 .50 21% .51 84% .43 1.16 60% 25% 38% -1 0 1.00 29% 1.4 .42 13% .33 78% .26
Jan
10		 South Florida C+ D A+ F C- 37% 12% 51% A- C F D F+ B- A+ A+ A+ F+ D A+ F+ F 29% 2% 70% B- F B- F+ D+ C B+ A- A
1.06 50% 80% 27% -3 +1 0.98 18% 0.8 .15 18% .65 79% .51 1.27 63% 0% 38% +5 +2 1.16 36% 1.3 .46 15% .31 68% .21
Jan
14		 Charlotte A D+ A+ A+ A+ 56% 8% 35% A+ A+ A F D+ D A A+ A+ B- C F C C- 46% 14% 40% D+ C- A+ A+ A+ F B F D+
1.29 56% 50% 53% +10 +3 1.27 39% 0.7 .29 16% .39 82% .32 1.11 61% 57% 35% +5 +1 1.14 17% 0.4 .07 12% .29 88% .26
Jan
18		 UAB A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ 49% 10% 41% A A+ C- A C+ B F A+ D+ B- D- B+ D+ D+ 38% 41% 21% A+ C A+ B+ A F D+ C- D+
1.38 72% 67% 46% +17 +2 1.41 24% 1.2 .28 14% .16 90% .15 1.08 67% 30% 33% 0 -3 0.96 23% 0.9 .20 7% .33 73% .24
Jan
21		 Memphis A F F B+ D 40% 16% 44% B D+ A A A+ A+ A+ A+ A+ B- C A+ A A 37% 18% 45% D- B+ C- B- C+ A B- C+ B-
1.26 41% 29% 37% -6 +1 0.91 42% 1.1 .47 12% .62 86% .54 1.00 58% 22% 26% -8 0 0.86 38% 1.1 .40 23% .28 71% .20
Jan
24		 Rice A C F A- C- 38% 21% 42% B+ C B+ A+ A+ C+ A+ B+ A+ F+ F+ F F F 24% 31% 45% B- F F+ D+ D- B B- B+ B
1.31 61% 20% 40% +1 0 1.04 38% 1.8 .68 15% .50 79% .39 1.22 67% 47% 45% +12 -2 1.22 41% 1.0 .41 20% .26 64% .17
Jan
28		 North Texas A- C- D+ C C+ 56% 6% 38% A+ B C A+ A+ A- C A+ A- B A- F A+ B 56% 12% 33% F B- B A+ A C D+ A- C
1.16 56% 33% 33% -2 +3 1.04 31% 1.6 .48 18% .36 86% .31 0.93 48% 50% 24% -9 +2 0.88 30% 0.7 .21 17% .37 64% .24
Feb
1		 Wichita St. A+ A+ B+ B+ A+ 42% 19% 40% A A+ B+ A+ A+ B- A+ C+ A+ D+ A+ D+ C A 47% 24% 29% D+ A- A+ F D- F+ F A- F
1.28 75% 44% 37% +10 0 1.23 33% 2.1 .71 15% .44 70% .31 1.14 38% 42% 33% -9 0 0.84 30% 1.5 .47 11% .50 63% .31
Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows Shot Accuracy Shot Selection PPS 2nd Chance TOs Freethrows
Feb
4		 Florida Atlantic B- B F C- C+ 42% 15% 44% C+ C+ F+ B+ D+ A C C+ C B- D- A A+ A 36% 17% 47% C- A D+ F F+ F+ A- A+ A
1.08 61% 25% 33% -1 +1 1.02 19% 1.1 .22 11% .30 74% .22 1.05 67% 30% 22% -6 0 0.90 35% 1.2 .43 14% .24 60% .14
Feb
8		 South Florida B F F C+ D+ 22% 14% 63% C+ D+ A A+ A+ C- B- F C- C+ D- F A C- 43% 6% 51% C C- A A+ A+ F F D+ F
1.08 36% 29% 35% -5 0 0.92 40% 1.4 .55 20% .33 61% .20 1.17 64% 67% 27% -1 +2 1.04 31% 0.5 .15 10% .49 77% .37
Feb
11		 UAB F+ B D+ F D 43% 12% 45% A- C- C+ D+ C F F+ F+ F+ B- A+ A+ F A 50% 20% 30% D B+ B+ D C+ D- A C+ A
0.94 64% 33% 26% -4 +1 0.98 27% 0.9 .24 21% .17 67% .11 1.02 44% 18% 38% -9 +1 0.85 27% 1.1 .30 9% .21 69% .15
Feb
14		 Wichita St. B+ C- A+ D C+ 20% 25% 55% C- C+ D+ B- C- A- B A+ A- D+ F F A+ D- 43% 31% 25% B D B A- A- F F A- F+
1.13 55% 50% 30% -1 -2 0.96 24% 1.0 .24 13% .32 79% .25 1.18 68% 56% 15% +3 -1 1.06 36% 0.9 .31 9% .43 63% .27
Feb
18		 Charlotte B- F+ F A+ B- 24% 6% 69% B B C B C+ D- B- C+ B- C- F A F F 33% 14% 53% B- F+ A+ F B- C A+ F A+
1.20 50% 0% 41% +3 +1 1.10 29% 1.2 .35 17% .33 72% .24 1.13 75% 29% 42% +11 0 1.24 23% 1.2 .27 18% .15 88% .13
Feb
22		 Texas San Antonio A+ A+ F A+ A+ 43% 8% 49% B+ A+ C- D- D A+ A+ A A+ D+ C+ A F+ F+ 38% 20% 43% C D- A+ F D D+ A F B
1.40 74% 25% 42% +12 +2 1.30 35% 1.0 .35 10% .39 80% .31 1.03 52% 27% 38% -2 0 0.98 15% 2.4 .35 15% .18 82% .15
Feb
25		 Tulane A+ C C+ A+ A- 42% 9% 49% A- A B+ A+ A+ A- D- A D+ A+ A+ C- A A 38% 17% 46% C- A- C B+ C+ A A- A+ A+
1.36 57% 40% 44% +7 +2 1.20 40% 1.2 .49 14% .26 80% .21 0.84 44% 38% 27% -10 0 0.83 22% 1.0 .22 20% .30 63% .19
Mar
5		 East Carolina A+ A+ D A- A+ 40% 12% 48% A- A+ B+ A+ A+ A+ A- D B B A+ A A A+ 25% 32% 43% A A+ F F F A+ F C F
1.40 81% 33% 40% +13 +1 1.31 37% 1.4 .52 9% .33 70% .23 0.99 36% 29% 26% -13 -2 0.70 44% 1.4 .62 26% .54 70% .38
Mar
8		 Temple B- F F A- F 43% 7% 50% A D- C- A+ B- A- A+ A- A+ D+ F A+ A+ B+ 34% 21% 45% C B+ A- F F D+ A F C-
1.17 40% 0% 39% -6 +2 0.93 26% 1.3 .34 12% .54 78% .42 1.14 83% 18% 21% -4 0 0.92 23% 1.9 .42 12% .27 100% .27
Mar
13		 North Texas C- D- F D- F 35% 11% 54% B+ F+ D- A+ C+ B A+ A+ A+ A- C A+ C+ B- 45% 18% 37% C B- B+ A+ A+ D C D- C-
0.99 50% 0% 29% -11 +1 0.82 24% 1.4 .33 20% .53 82% .44 0.92 56% 8% 31% -8 +1 0.87 29% 0.5 .15 14% .35 74% .26



Numbers in tables represent percent chance of outcome occurring.



Projected American Athletic Finish

0-18 1-17 2-16 3-15 4-14 5-13 6-12 7-11 8-10 9-9 10-8 11-7 12-6 13-5 14-4 15-3 16-2 17-1 18-0 Total
1st 1st
2nd 100.0 100.0 2nd
3rd 3rd
4th 4th
5th 5th
6th 6th
7th 7th
8th 8th
9th 9th
10th 10th
11th 11th
12th 12th
13th 13th
Total 100.0 Total



American Athletic Regular Season Championship

Record Champion Total Outright 2-Way 3-Way 4-Way 5-Way 6-Way 7-Way 8-Way
18-0
17-1
16-2
15-3
14-4
13-5 0.0%
12-6
11-7
10-8
9-9
Total



NCAA Tournament Selection

Conf RecordRecord ChanceTourney
Bid		AutoAt-LargeAvg
Seed		 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 No Bid At-Large if not Auto
18-0
17-1
16-2
15-3
14-4
13-5 100.0% 32.3% 29.1% 3.3% 11.2 0.0 0.7 25.2 6.4 0.0 67.7 4.6%
12-6
11-7
10-8
9-9
8-10
7-11
6-12
5-13
4-14
3-15
2-16
1-17
0-18
Total 100% 32.3% 29.1% 3.3% 11.2 67.7 4.6%


Best / Worst Case Scenarios

ChanceTourney
Bid		Avg
Seed		 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Win Out 29.1% 100.0% 11.2 0.1 2.3 78.7 18.8 0.1
Win Out, Lose in Conf. Tourney Championship 30.9% 7.9% 11.3 0.1 5.7 2.1
Win Out, Lose in Conf. Tourney Semi-Final 40.0% 2.1% 11.3 0.0 1.4 0.7 0.0